Tesla refers to its robotic software as FSD, and police in Seattle have just released a statement that the infamously dangerous robot allowed on public roads has murdered an innocent man.

After the crash in a suburban area about 15 miles (24 kilometers) northeast of Seattle, the driver told a trooper that he was using Tesla’s Autopilot system and looked at his cellphone while the Tesla was moving.

“The next thing he knew there was a bang and the vehicle lurched forward as it accelerated and collided with the motorcycle in front of him,” the trooper wrote in a probable-cause document.

Experts have condemned the Tesla system as a fraud.

“Unless you have data showing that the driver never has to supervise the automation, then there’s no basis for claiming they’re going to be acceptably safe,” [Phil Koopman, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University who studies autonomous vehicle safety], said.

This comes right after the WSJ reported that Tesla has intentionally made their robot designs less safe, intentionally deceiving investors and putting the public in harms way… similar to how Twitter had its safety controls turned off and experts removed when it was taken over.

And this is exactly what I said back in 2016 was happening, public algorithmic slaughter by Tesla, as an early warning that too few people took seriously enough.

Without fraud, there would be no Tesla.

Remember the Darwin Award legend of people trying to make their car fly? Here’s Tesla, yet again being the dumbest and most dangerous car on (and off) the road:

…speeding off the 202 Parkway in a new white Tesla that went airborne [off an embankment] and crashed into a treeline near the Pickertown Road bridge underpass in Warrington Township earlier this month. [Cited July 8 with] reckless driving, and failure to drive in a single lane, according to charging documents.

This case included empty cans in the crashed car. This suggests the Tesla CEO repeatedly telling his customers that they will be safe when drunk on Autopilot has actually led to very dangerous roads right now.

Failure to drive in a single lane was also highlighted in a recent FSD analysis by a concerned investor, who warned that Tesla is misleading everyone with obvious fraud.

…the highway was curvy and narrow, and had a solid white line separating lanes, signaling a prohibition against lane changes. Still, the Model Y switched lanes twice under that condition.

As if nearly crashing head-on into a police car wasn’t enough, somehow Tesla has not been banned.

After X Twitter was caught promoting anti-Harris political disinformation for election interference (AI deepfakes), it now has been caught censoring pro-Harris campaigns.

The X account for the White Dudes for Harris campaign group was suspended on Monday, apparently just minutes after its debut fundraising event raised $4 million for Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2024 presidential bid.

Asked on his personal X account why the organization, which boasted over 13,000 X followers, was blocked, organizer Ross Morales Rocketto responded, simply, “Got Elon Musk scared.”

Notably, the extremist right-wing hate platform of X Twitter has been in a financial death spiral posting rapid and record losses.

However this is easily explained by war historians. Both X Twitter and Tesla now are nothing more than fraud platforms weaponized for undermining democracy and faith in our institutions, poisoning our information ecosystem, and exacerbating hate and social division.

Criticizing X Twitter for its lack of revenue is like telling a suicide bomber they need better shoes.

The billionaires pouring money into Elon Musk’s white supremacist campaigns are measuring the crater size of disinformation bombs they are funding, not worried about making money this quarter or the next.

Remember, folks, the Tesla CEO promised us the safest car on the road that would eliminate crashes by 2018. Instead, the brand has uniquely increased dangers to the point where if someone films a major highway there’s a high likelihood they’ll get footage of a Tesla crash.

A BBC camera crew has filmed a collision between two cars while preparing a news report about road safety on the Lincolnshire stretch of the A1.

Perhaps the most interesting part of this story is some obvious propaganda slinging from a highway spokesperson.

National Highways is responsible for the A1. A spokesperson said safety was its top priority. “The A1 generally performs well on safety. Nevertheless, we are never complacent and we recognise the concern that people have expressed.”

No. The A1 doesn’t perform well. That’s the point of the BBC turning on a camera to watch Tesla crash, the kind of reporting clearly ignored by the person claiming to be responding. And here’s context from the UK Parliamentary debates just a few days ago, 29th July 2024:

…we see a worrying proliferation in road accidents—all too often fatal—along our stretch of this ancient road. The Department for Transport’s data unfortunately demonstrates that proliferation. In 2022, there were 500 crashes on the A1, 26% more than the A5 and 16% more than the A2. In the last five years there have been 201 closures, the majority due to accidents. That averages out as an accident every two weeks, but unfortunately, in the few weeks leading up to this debate, we have seen four serious accidents, including one tragic death and three people seriously injured.

That’s the A1 not generally performing well by any standard.

Yes, there has been complacency. Here’s an example: saying “generally performs well” about a road that doesn’t perform well. Few phrases could show as much complacency about safety as this one: “generally performs well”.

At least the spokesperson didn’t say “but how was the rest of the play Mrs. Lincoln, generally performed well?”

And of course there is actually no evidence that public concerns are being recognized, which undermines any claim about top priority. In other words, recognition is an extremely low bar for safety concern and National Highways hasn’t even proven that.

Perhaps the absolute stupidity of Tesla safety failures, the constant sore thumb of any road and cause of crashes, will help highlight the A1 being a safety failure.