New study: “being able to find a mate and reproduce is more important than not being eaten”

Evolutionary biologists studied nearly 2,000 land vertebrates to assess why colors are used for different purposes in the wild.

They found a repetitive pattern that explains simply when and how the colors and hues appear.

“It’s interesting to see that for some colors like red, orange, and yellow, they’re used with similar frequency as both a way to avoid predators and as a way for mate attraction,” says Emberts.

“On the flip side, blue coloration was more frequently associated with mating as opposed to predator avoidance.”

The diurnal animals’ coloration makes sense: a flashy animal, in the light of day, is going to be seen by other animals, including potential mates. That may make them bigger targets for predators, too, but it seems like being able to find a mate and reproduce is more important than not being eaten. The females of these species are often drab in comparison, and therefore better able to hide from predators and survive to rear offspring.

But nocturnal animals slither and snoop about in the dark. A male nocturnal snake doesn’t have much use for a bright color for sexual signaling if the females can’t see it.

“Warning colors have evolved even in species with no eyes,” Wiens says. “It’s questionable whether most snakes or amphibians can see colors, so their bright colors are generally used for signaling to predators rather than to members of the same species.”

It’s after science reports like this that things never really appear the same to me again.

Black Snowflakes: “Where was your wedding? When? Any airstrikes?”

A first book of poetry by U.S. Army veteran Ryan Stoval is titled “Black Snowflakes Smothering a Torch: How to Talk to Your Veteran – A Primer”.

In order to facilitate dialogue, between those who have experienced the crushing arms of war and those who have not, at its foundation Black Snowflakes presupposes that many issues veterans face when reintegrating originate not from war trauma but from the hypocrisies inherent to American civilian culture itself.

Source: https://ryanstovall.com/

It’s a quick read and I’ve found many pithy and moving pieces about a struggle to make sense of life-changing moments when forced into sharp contrast. The pages are often processing polarity or managing binary/dichotomous survival decisions, which should resonate deeply with anyone who thinks deeply about the grey scales of risk.

If nothing else, it’s a philosophical journey through some of the pain and remorse of being forced into high-stakes high-speed context switching.

For example I allowed myself time to pause to think about a “Cheerios” reference in a poem titled “American Weddings”, which only amplified the clarion call that comes next through his vision.

Were was your wedding? When? Any airstrikes?

That’s a great example to me of how directly and quickly he will deliver contrast, repaint a picture.

Perhaps an even better example of such polarity and switching is a piece called “But By The Grace of Poor Weapons Maintenance”.

It opens with a narrative like “I hesitate, thinking here is surely one of ours” and then, in “an instant” flips the narrative to…

Well, you can probably guess the “horrified” inverse when the inevitable battlefield identity switch is flipped into someone NOT being “one of ours”.


Related:

Soldatenlieder Der Einsame Posten of 1865, classic poem with a battlefield identity switch.

Also, the anti-war poetry of War Pigs

SPIN: For some reason in “War Pigs,” it always bothered me that you rhymed “generals in their masses” with “just like witches at black masses.” Why use “masses” twice? Did you try to think of a different word?

Butler: I just couldn’t think of anything else to rhyme with it. And a lot of the old Victorian poets used to do stuff like that — rhyming the same word together. It didn’t really bother me. It wasn’t a lesson in poetry or anything.

Elon Musk’s “Crash Faster” Management of Twitter is Killing Trust in All His Dumb Brands

The CEO abusing staff at Twitter is in a toxic tryst with his other companies.

It’s not just that he seems to be ignoring them, he’s not even protecting them from his own dumb mistakes.

A huge spike in misinformation is now being spread by Twitter’s CEO to his other brands.

Here is one of his newly “verified” accounts spitting all over him:

Source: Twitter

And if that’s not clear enough, here’s another of his newly “verified” accounts also spitting all over him:

Source: Twitter

The complete failure of his best idea for verification systems was easily avoidable. An $8 “verification” system with no authority mechanism is as ethically bankrupt as it looks at first glance. Some of the worst consequences from such mistakes however are unfortunately permanent.

Putting a car on the road, let alone sending a rocket into space, means strict government-led safety requirements for a very simple reason: a market often doesn’t solve properly on its own regarding catastrophic harms. Outside, inherited, oversight is necessary.

As I warned in my 2016 presentations Josh Brown was decapitated in a Tesla because of such dumb “crash faster” thinking that falsely described primitive lane assist as “collision avoidance”. There’s no “do over” for Josh after CEO’s disinformation led to his death, and the world is worse off because of it.

To put it another way, the CEO of Twitter is openly saying he encourages dumb ideas to be put into practice quickly by engineers without any real oversight or sense of social or moral obligations.

He even rushed into firing half the company without knowing how it runs and then a few days later was wasting money and time to hire back the people he had just fired.

Such lust for “permanent improvisation” is disgusting and sad to witness; those who know even basic history are condemned to watch other people repeat its worst mistakes.

Are all his engineers being told everything is just fine when people die in their rockets or cars? Do those engineers just expect they will go on and kill more people later (unless they’re fired and replaced with someone more willing to ignore safety; as disposable as their dead customers)?

That’s not even an exaggeration. Musk literally described his far-off vision for an optimal “mission to Mars” as “a bunch of people will probably die“.

Imagine a CEO writing “your tragic loss of life, caused by our dumb ideas being thrown into production without care, is because… uncaring works out better for me”.

Musk is demonstrating yet again his willful rejection of science, based in an inability to grasp basic engineering principles (e.g. an ethical requirement for social good).

Although the Twitter disaster helps illustrate why Tesla delivered worse products over time compared with other cars on the road, and why its value depreciates faster than market averages, it doesn’t explain why this man is allowed to be a CEO in America.

Policeman Sentenced to Jail and Fined for Posting Disinformation on Twitter

Interesting AFP news from Spain:

A Barcelona court on Tuesday sentenced a policeman to 15 months in jail for posting a video on Twitter…

He allegedly spread xenophobic hate on Twitter, fabricated an incident that never happened and claimed it to be covered up by “mainstream media”.

The civil guard in 2019 posted a 45-second video showing a man viciously punching and kicking a woman unconscious and then trying to remove her clothes. While the incident took place in China, he wrote it showed the rape of a woman in the coastal town of Canet de Mar at the hands of a minor who arrived in Spain without his parents. He also claimed in the post, which was seen nearly 22,000 times, that mainstream media was covering up the rape. Public prosecutors said the man had published several other racist and xenophobic messages on social media. They had been seeking a two-year jail term but just before his trial, the policeman admitted the crime and accepted a shorter sentence in exchange, the court in Barcelona said.

Twitter let hateful disinformation from this policeman’s account run for so long that it gathered tens of thousands of views.

The thread of this story, such as an authority being forced to admit crime, stands in stark difference from America.

Latest news out of California is that celebrities still act like their authority/influence used to breed disinformation on Twitter is some kind of strategy to win a seat in government.

Former Giants first baseman Aubrey Huff’s first foray into politics does not appear to be going well. […] Huff has gotten attention for his offensive online musings since retiring. Among his most controversial comments were: Suggesting kidnapping Iranian women (then saying it was a joke), implying he and his sons would need more guns if Bernie Sanders became president and slamming the Giants for hiring Alyssa Nakken as a coach. His Twitter account was suspended late last year for violating COVID misinformation policies.

Sounds like if that policeman in Spain instead had played sports in America he wouldn’t be facing jail, he’d be running campaigns and fundraisers to breed hate crimes.