Dobrindt Under Scrutiny as Russian Hybrid Warfare Crew Runs Posh Berlin Lifestyle

A cameraman for one of Russia’s largest war channels stood a few metres from Chancellor Friedrich Merz in August, filming him on a phone. ZDF broadcast the footage in its coverage of the Mecklenburg-Vorpommern election campaign. The man in the frame is Igor Dolmatov. He has lived in Berlin since at least 2018, holds an annual contract with the Iswestija publishing group, and on 9 September travelled to Prague with reporter Vitaly Chashchukhin to film an interview for Rybar. Chashchukhin told the Czech reporters at the meeting point that he was working for Rybar. Police questioned both men for nine hours and ordered them out of the country within three days.

They went home to Zehlendorf, Berlin because German leadership is asleep at the wheel.

The men have an employer on the EU broadcasting ban since 17 May 2024. Rybar’s founder Mikhail Zvinchuk has been on the EU sanctions list since June 2023 as a member of the working group Putin created to coordinate mobilisation for the war. The US State Department has offered up to $10 million for information on Rybar and nine named members of its staff since October 2024 and names Rostec, the state arms holding, as the channel’s funder. Two men working for that channel have been registered residents of Berlin’s most expensive district for a combined two decades. Seznam Zprávy exposed them by answering an interview request. CORRECTIV and iStories then documented the addresses, the contracts, the salaries and the car.

Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has spent sixteen months barking about the standard for who leaves Germany.

On 18 July 2025 his ministry flew 81 Afghan men to Kabul and he called them “schwere und schwerste Straftäter”. On 23 December 2025 the ministry announced the first removal to Syria since 2011, a man convicted in Lower Saxony, alongside an Afghan convicted in Bavaria of assault. Dobrindt’s words that day:

Unsere Gesellschaft hat ein berechtigtes Interesse daran, dass Straftäter unser Land verlassen. Wir stehen für Kontrolle, Konsequenz und klare Kante.

A second Syrian followed in January. Charter flights carried 20 Afghans in February 2026, 25 in April and 32 in June. Since July 2026, per Bundestag data compiled by Mediendienst Integration, every adult single male Afghan without a right to remain can be presented to the Afghan embassy for travel documents, conviction or no conviction. The minister’s summary of the policy:

Wer schwere Straftaten begeht, muss Deutschland verlassen.

He has spent the same period naming the threat. Presenting the Verfassungsschutzbericht 2025 on 30 June he opened with “Deutschland steht unter Druck”, placed Russia first among foreign adversaries for espionage, sabotage and disinformation, and demanded the services be rebuilt into “echte Geheimdienste”. On 28 August he told Baltic interior ministers that attack scenarios and disinformation campaigns were increasing. On 1 September, after attributing the Leipzig airport drone to Russia, he announced stricter entry controls for Russian citizens, the closure of the Bonn consulate and the Russian House in Berlin, and called the package “verhältnismäßig und besonnen, aber gleichermaßen entschlossen”. His ministry’s website introduces disinformation as a hybrid threat with the example of a propaganda video aimed at German support for Ukraine.

Set the standard against the case.

Removed under Dobrindt Retained under Dobrindt
A Syrian convicted of rape and assault, escorted by Bundespolizei onto a scheduled flight Iswestija’s Berlin bureau chief since 2019, who renewed his contract on 1 January 2025, eight months after the EU ban, and drew about 10.2 million rubles from the listed outlet in the first seven months of 2025
An Afghan convicted of assault, flown from Munich to Kabul A cameraman who filmed the Chancellor from inside a campaign crowd in August, then filmed for Rybar in Prague in September
Adult single male Afghans with no conviction, presented to their embassy since July 2026 Two men working for a channel funded by a sanctioned arms conglomerate and carrying a US bounty, on the payroll of an outlet the EU banned
Russian citizens generally, under the stricter entry controls of 1 September Chashchukhin, who crossed to Russia and back at least seven times since 2022 in a Berlin-registered Porsche 718, per FSB border records. It’s easily identified by the rare “Miami Blue” paint, which is basically the AfD color.

The law Dobrindt uses for the left column already covers the right. The Aufenthaltsgesetz treats a threat to the free democratic order or to the security of the Federal Republic as a particularly serious ground for expulsion under Section 54(1) No. 2, and Section 5(4) requires refusal of a residence title where that ground exists.

Neither provision requires a conviction. They were written for people whose danger lies in what they do for a foreign state rather than in a criminal record. A minister who sends men with no conviction to the Afghan embassy for travel papers has already accepted that conviction is optional. He applies the principle to Afghans and withholds it from Rybar.

Three federal files already held these names, so the plot thickens. Foreign correspondents are accredited through the Bundespresseamt and the Auswärtiges Amt, and Chashchukhin has reported from Berlin for the Iswestija group since 2014, when his Pyaty Kanal segment claimed Cologne schoolchildren were fainting after being made to colour drawings of genitals. The May 2024 ban made every employee of the Berlin bureau an employee of a listed outlet, on a list the federal government helped write. The US reward on Rybar staff has circulated among allied services since October 2024. Bundespolizei enforces the entry controls of 1 September. The BKA, a BMI agency, protects the Chancellor. Each of these files sits under the minister. iStories put its questions to the BMI, the Berlin Senate interior administration and the Berlin LfV.

Berlin declined to comment. The minister has three clear zones of fault.

The first is jurisdiction. Residence permits are issued by Berlin’s Landesamt für Einwanderung. The law it applies is federal, the guidance it follows is written by the BMI, and the minister who negotiated with the Taliban and Damascus to make removals “regelhaft” owns the residence regime end to end. He owns it in Zehlendorf.

The second is counterintelligence. Known propagandists at a fixed address are easier to watch than unknown ones, and a service may prefer to leave them in place. That argument ended on 9 September. The Czech interview, the flight from the meeting point and the expulsion order put both men on notice. Whatever observation value they held was spent in Prague, by Czechs.

The third is the fine print. The May 2024 measure is a broadcasting and content-distribution ban under Regulation 833/2014, and the two men are not themselves listed persons. Paying their salaries breaks no EU rule. Article 2f of the same regulation prohibits facilitating the outlet’s content in the Union. A correspondent bureau exists to produce that content. Its chief renewed his contract to do so after the ban took effect. Prague questioned the two men for nine hours and ordered them out, while Germany plays dumb.

The government closed the Russian House because it housed Kremlin propaganda. It closed the Bonn consulate because official cover enabled hostile activity. It tightened entry rules for Russian citizens because the border is where hybrid operations show. It removes Afghans and Syrians on the principle that people who endanger the public forfeit residence.

Every one of those measures describes Chashchukhin and Dolmatov.

The minister who announced them has to say when his agencies first recorded the two men as Rybar and Iswestija staff, and what followed the May 2024 listing. Until he does, the most effective action taken against Russian propaganda in Berlin this year was taken by a Czech news site and a Czech police station.

Tesla FSD Fails Belgian Safety Tests

After a decade of more and more data, more and more cars on the road, Tesla is getting worse and worse. It now causes more crashes and kills more people than ever. The last three months have each set new records showing the system is degrading road safety over time.

Tesla’s own reports to NHTSA under the Standing General Order. January through June crashes, 2022 to 2026: 180, 261, 269, 476, 826. A 4.6x rise over five years. The increase from 2025 to 2026 alone (350) is nearly double the 2022 total for the same six months. May 2026 set the single-month record at 207, followed by even higher records of crashes in June and July. Source: Electrek

Belgium put that data to the test on their own and found Tesla in 2026 still can’t read basic traffic signs, and puts cyclists in danger.

FSD automated-driving system frequently exceeded speed limits and attempted to overtake cyclists on streets where ‌it’s prohibited, a road-safety advocacy group said, citing tests it conducted in Belgium.
The Belgian group Johanna.be – which advocates for pedestrian and cyclist safety – tested Tesla’s system over three days in July, covering about 400 km (249 miles). It found that FSD often exceeded speed limits ​in 20 km/h and 30 km/h zones, and incorrectly displayed higher speed limits to drivers, potentially misleading ​them about how fast the vehicle should travel.

The misleading drivers point is important. If the car gets “better” at misleading, then safety goes down while people think it should go up. That’s one of the most dangerous elements of Tesla, because what traffic law prohibits the dashboard running on AI that is misleading drivers? What law prohibits people from promising a system will improve, when it doesn’t, or it even gets worse?

Notably, Tesla initially claimed in 2013 it was rushing AI into its cars specifically to eliminate risks to cyclists (after a Tesla killed one on Highway 1). And for years it shamed and censored anyone who reported dangers and failires. Since then it has become infamous for hiding the data to delay and avoid being accountable.

Source: My presentation at MindTheSec 2021

Trump White House Press Ban Matches 1933 Nazi Law

A lawyer who named Mein Kampf his favorite book of 2013, and praised Hitler’s grasp of propaganda, has now signed a brief asking the courts to defer to the President’s personal judgment that journalists are national security threats.

Hitler’s 1933 state labeled someone an enemy by judgment of their views, and treated their speech as a threat to the security of the nation.

First were political opponents of Hitler. That meant Communists and Social Democrats filled Dachau within two months of him seizing power.

Memorial block for Richard Lipinski, the Leipzig SPD chairman and Reichstag deputy who voted against Hitler’s Enabling Act. The regime imprisoned him, killing him in 1936. He is one of the 96 Reichstag deputies the Nazis murdered.

The regime then extended it to Jews and a growing list of others. The list grew as officials improvised toward whatever they understood Hitler wanted, under legal instruments that licensed action outside the ordinary law. The mechanism always stayed the same.

The Trump administration is using the same mechanism today. His Justice Department brief filed September 22 in CNN v. Trump (D.D.C. No. 1:26-cv-03287) applies it to the press.

The brief and the Trump administration’s own statements line up with Hitler’s regime, row by row.

1933 2026
Mein Kampf I/10: the state must ignore the “Geflunker einer sogenannten Pressefreiheit” (humbug of so-called press freedom). DOJ brief: White House access is “a privilege.” Asks the court to overrule Sherrill v. Knight.
Mein Kampf I/10: the state must shield the people from bad or malicious “educators” and watch the press most closely. DOJ brief: the President decides who is a “bona fide” journalist.
Mein Kampf I/10: press freedom means “straflose Volksbelügung und Volksvergiftung” (unpunished lying to and poisoning of the people). White House letters: “trafficking in verifiable falsehoods about national security.” Trump: fake news has “grown like Cancer.”
Goebbels, introducing the Schriftleitergesetz: he intends to remain the press’s “warm-hearted protector.” Trump: “not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish.”
Hitler: Social Democrats as Novemberverbrecher, the traitors who stabbed the army in the back. Trump on Democratic lawmakers: “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH.”
Mein Kampf I/10: take the press out of the hands of “Volksfremden und Volksfeinden” (aliens and enemies of the people). NSPM-7: “extremism on migration, race, and gender” as a common thread of domestic terrorism.
Reichstag Fire Decree, “zum Schutz von Volk und Staat”: press freedom suspended. DOJ brief: courts should defer to the President’s “personal judgment of national security considerations.”

A legal instrument is paired with a category the state defines. The 2026 list covers immigrants, “extremism” on gender, Democratic lawmakers accused of sedition, and now three news organizations. The mechanism accepts any label.

Michael Velchik, the Justice Department lawyer who signed the CNN ban brief, submitted a Harvard Latin paper written from Hitler’s perspective in 2011, according to three people in the department. And last year he argued the absurd Harvard funding case, claiming it was the fight against antisemitism.

Trump has already announced the next entry for his Hitler-era targeting machine: “Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow.”

Tesla Dangerous Sleeping Driver Defect Caught Again by CHP

The California Highway Patrol stopped a dangerous Tesla on Interstate 80 operating at 60 mph with its driver slumped asleep behind dark glasses. Officers cited him for unsafe speed, because the Vehicle Code treats him as the driver of a Level 2 car and holds him to every rule of the road.

That settles his liability. The car kept going because Tesla’s defective driver monitoring is… defective. Tesla claims it points a camera at the driver’s face to catch exactly this, and yet it let a sleeping man ride at highway speed behind a pair of sunglasses.

Manufacturers must address foreseeable misuse. That should be obvious. But sunglasses are an even lower bar to entry, because they are standard equipment for California drivers. Detection of standard driver alertness is even more critical than edge cases of misuse. The system can not be called safe if standard conditions fail unsafe.

Tesla recalled more than two million cars in December 2023 to strengthen its driver engagement controls, and NHTSA opened a review in 2024 of whether that remedy even worked. Tesla has made a reputation for its “fixes” being worse than before, its safety and value declining over time.

An NBC investigation has since found 43 videos of Tesla owners asleep or distracted at the wheel, 17 of them from 2026, and Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi has asked NHTSA whether the cabin camera can be beaten with a hat or sunglasses.

Reporters in Solano County just supplied the clear answer, that Tesla failed. The recall failed. The engineering is below the lowest bar.

The company known for burning people alive with defective door designs, after crashing into poles with defective AI designs, had a duty to build monitoring that works on drivers in dark glasses. Instead it has watched driver after driver sleep at highway speeds and done nothing. That’s what the CHP call a violation of basic speed law.

CHP stated, ‘Regardless of any special features a vehicle may possess…drivers are still responsible for the vehicle they are operating.’ The spokesman of CHP added that if a driver is found asleep behind the wheel, they are violating California’s basic speed law.

Basic. Not hard. Not advanced. Basic. Tesla engineering still can’t meet the most basic speed law.

Anyone spreading disinformation like “sleeping at the wheel of a self-driving car” is inventing a legal category that doesn’t exist; repeats Tesla’s fraudulent marketing. California banned saying exactly that in a 2022 law: prohibits manufacturer or dealer from deceptively naming or marketing partial automation features.

Therefore someone repeating Tesla PR there is “no law against it” should be stopped before they are dead and informed that there is “no new law needed, because the driver is fully liable.”

The evidence is clear why Tesla crashes keep going higher, killing more people in less time than ever. It’s the same case as a CEO of a construction company who made bridges that fatally collapsed killing people in cars, except he was sentenced to 18 years in jail while Elon Musk walks free.

The driver-assistance software it sells as “Full Self-Driving” produced 826 reported crashes in the first half of 2026, dramatically up from 476 a year earlier and 180 in 2022, with July 2026 the worst single month on record, after records in May and then again in June. Tesla promised a lower crash rate and withholds the data that would show it; the only number it is forced to publish by law is the count, and the crash count has quadrupled.

Tesla’s own reports to NHTSA under the Standing General Order. January through June crashes, 2022 to 2026: 180, 261, 269, 476, 826. A 4.6x rise over five years. The increase from 2025 to 2026 alone (350) is nearly double the 2022 total for the same six months. Monthly records fell three times running: 207 in May, 209 in June, 236 in July, with four fatal crashes in July. Source: Electrek