Trump’s ambassadors are antisemitic, just like Trump. And they will accuse others of it to force obedience.

Three US ambassadors in Europe — Belgium, France, Poland — have been summoned or rebuked by their host governments in recent weeks. The pattern is identical in each case: deploy accusations of antisemitism or personal insults to bully sovereign nations into compliance with Trump’s pathology.

The Jewish community is being used as a prop by Trump. The diplomacy is a protection racket for antisemites.

Start with Belgium, because Belgium exposes the racket.

Ambassador Bill White demanded in ALL-CAPS on the Swastika platform X:

DROP THE RIDICULOUS AND ANTI SEMITIC ‘PROSECUTION’ NOW OF THE 3 JEWISH RELIGIOUS FIGURES (MOHELS) IN ANTWERP!

He lobbed a prototypical white nationalist phrase at Belgium’s health minister calling him “very rude,” and claimed the minister refused to shake his hand. Accusations of “rudeness” alongside “uppity,” “insolent,” “impudent” are all well-known signals for American white supremacists. Emmett Till was murdered over an accusation that he was “fresh” to a white woman. The entire architecture of Jim Crow enforcement rested on the premise that insufficient deference from a subordinate was an offense requiring punishment.

Then he invoked American soldiers who died liberating Belgium in two world wars. He tagged Trump, Vance, Rubio, and the State Department for a performative clown show.

And here’s why he is completely wrong.

Belgian police investigated three mohels for performing circumcisions without medical licenses. Belgian law permits ritual circumcision when performed by a qualified physician under health and safety standards.

But wait, it’s even more clear than that.

The investigation was triggered by a complaint filed by a rabbi within the Jewish community itself, concerned about mohels practicing metzitzah b’peh — oral suction on circumcision wounds — which has infected infants with herpes in New York and elsewhere.

A Jewish religious leader asked Belgian authorities to protect Jewish babies from an unsafe practice.

Read that again. The investigation was initiated by the Jewish community to protect their own, by their own rules.

Belgium investigated. And America’s ambassador, driven by a White House claiming to be 40% Nazis, jumped in to falsely allege antisemitism.

That’s not defending Jews. That’s Trump performing ritual abuse of Jews.

Trump’s Antisemitic Franchise

In France, Charles Kushner — a convicted felon pardoned by Trump, father of Trump’s son-in-law — published an open letter in the Wall Street Journal accusing Macron of failing to confront antisemitism. France summoned him. Macron called it:

Unacceptable statement for somebody who is supposed to be a diplomat.

That’s because Kushner doesn’t care about antisemitism. He’s a Jew being used by Trump to protest France’s plan to recognize Palestinian statehood. Yeah, 147 UN member states already recognize it. “Anti-Zionism is antisemitism — plain and simple,” Kushner wrote, collapsing all criticism of Israeli government policy into bigotry against Jews.

Idiocracy.

The Trumipan framing means Belgium can’t enforce medical licensing, France can’t recognize a state, and any sovereign decision that inconveniences the indicted Netanyahu becomes hatred of Jews.

When Macron pointed out that disagreeing with Benjamin Netanyahu doesn’t make him antisemitic, he was stating what should be obvious. Kushner was being used. The dictator loyalty test was dressed as moral concern.

In Poland, Ambassador Tom Rose cut ties with the speaker of parliament because the man said Trump doesn’t deserve a Nobel Peace Prize. No antisemitism accusation so far, just raw enforcement of the rule that no one may disrespect Trump. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk responded: “Allies should respect, not lecture, each other.” Rose replied that he will “always defend my President without hesitation, exception or apology.”

That sentence unlocks the whole pathological operation of Trump derangement. Not “defend American interests.” Not “advance the president’s agenda.” Defend Trump.

Thin Skinned White House

Former Ambassador Daniel Fried, who served in Poland under Clinton and later as assistant secretary of state under George W. Bush, identified the mechanism precisely. These ambassadors, he said, “are responding to what they think is expected of them” from a “very thin-skinned White House.” They fear that insufficient aggression will get them attacked by someone in Trump-world.

So the ambassadors perform Trumpistan rituals. They don’t know diplomacy only Trump loyalty.

The antisemitism charge is premium ammunition because it carries moral weight that other accusations don’t, especially from a White House claiming to be 40% Nazis. Nobody wants to be called antisemitic, especially the antisemite. That’s exactly what makes the weaponization so effective and so corrosive.

Fried contrasted this with how George W. Bush handled Spain’s José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, who campaigned against the Iraq War by calling Bush’s ally Aznar a puppet. After Zapatero won, Bush called to congratulate him and said he understood it was a campaign, and that they still had work to do together. Zapatero was stunned.

He reaches out to me after all I said?

Bush “had his eye on bigger prizes,” Fried said. Trump’s ambassadors have their eyes on Trump’s feed.

Trump’s Antisemitic Records

If Trump cared about antisemitism, the record would show it. His record shows the exact opposite.

In November 2022, Trump hosted Nick Fuentes at Mar-a-Lago for dinner. Fuentes is a white supremacist identified as such by the Department of Justice, a Holocaust denier who has called Hitler “awesome” and “right.” Trump said the dinner was “quick and uneventful.” He was reportedly “impressed” by Fuentes. He never condemned Fuentes’s views, not once — despite personally attacking Marjorie Taylor Greene as a traitor, mocking Thomas Massie’s second marriage after his first wife died, and demanding Seth Meyers be fired, all in a single week. He can name enemies at will. He chose not to name this one.

In September 2024, Trump told the Israeli-American Council that Jewish voters would be “partly to blame” if he lost the election. At a separate event the same day, he said any Jewish person voting for Democrats “should have their head examined” and that Democrats have a “hold, or curse” on Jewish Americans. He said he deserved “100 percent” of the Jewish vote because of his Israel policies — treating American Jews not as citizens with independent political judgment but as an Israeli interest group whose loyalty he owns.

These are not the words of someone who cares about, let alone fights against, antisemitism.

They are the words of someone who deploys it for power, the ancient trope of dual loyalty, the implication that Jews who don’t support him are traitors to their own kind.

In November 2025, when Tucker Carlson interviewed Fuentes and the Heritage Foundation fractured over it, Trump said:

You can’t tell him who to interview.

He wouldn’t condemn a Holocaust denier with a direct line to his base, but his ambassadors will brand Belgium antisemitic for enforcing medical licensing laws at the request of a rabbi.

Trumpistan

The pattern isn’t complicated. Antisemitism accusations from Trump’s ambassadors activate in exactly one situation: when a European ally does something Trump doesn’t like.

Recognize Palestine? Antisemitic.

Enforce medical regulations? Antisemitic.

Say Trump doesn’t deserve a Nobel Prize? Well, they haven’t yet found a Jew to abuse, so they just cut ties.

Meanwhile, actual antisemites dine at Mar-a-Lago, get defended on national television, and remain un-condemned by the man whose ambassadors lecture Europe about hatred of Jews.

Belgium’s foreign minister put it cleanly:

Labeling Belgium as antisemitic is not just wrong, it’s dangerous disinformation that undermines the real fight against hatred.

He’s right. Every time antisemitism is weaponized as a diplomatic cudgel to silence legitimate policy disagreements, it becomes harder to identify and fight the real thing. That’s not a side effect. That’s the point. The accusation is designed to lose meaning through overuse — to make the word available for political deployment precisely because it has been drained of its moral content.

Jews who face actual violence on European streets are not protected by Bill White’s ALL-CAPS posts. They’re endangered by them, because the next time someone raises a genuine alarm about antisemitism, the word will carry a little less weight. It will sound a little more like what it has become in Trump’s diplomatic vocabulary: noise.

Trump doesn’t fight antisemitism. He strip-mines it.

This news should end OpenAI. Their management officially states they not only buried danger warnings, they did so intentionally, choosing not to warn of coming mass murder.

According to the Wall Street Journal, which first reported the story, “about a dozen staffers debated whether to take action on Van Rootselaar’s posts.”

Some had identified the suspect’s usage of the AI tool as an indication of real world violence and encouraged leaders to alert authorities, the US outlet reported.

But, it said, leaders of the company decided not to do so.

In a statement, a spokesperson for OpenAI said: “In June 2025, we proactively identified an account associated with this individual [Jesse Van Rootselaar] via our abuse detection and enforcement efforts, which include automated tools and human investigations to identify misuses of our models in furtherance of violent activities.”

[…]

OpenAI has said it will uphold its policy of alerting authorities only in cases of imminent risk because alerting them too broadly could cause unintended harm.

On February 10, 2026, Van Rootselaar shot two people at the family home, then went to Tumbler Ridge Secondary School and killed six more people, including five children, before committing suicide. Twenty-five others were injured.

To be clear, OpenAI claims to be an intelligence product. It claims to predict accurately and wants to be a defense tool. And yet here we see exactly the opposite. Allowing children to be murdered. The shooter here is incidental. We are reading that every future flagged user gets the same cost-benefit analysis run to enable potential victims.

First, they claim their detection system works. They tout that they proactively identified the account, flagged it, had human reviewers examine it, and banned it. They present this as responsible behavior.

Second, what they say is they had concern for families, what they mean is concern only for themselves and user retention. Actually alerting anyone who could have helped prevent tragedy is being positioned as if harmful to… perception of OpenAI! The company argues that preventing mass death could be distressing for the young people and their families.

How?

This is the terrifying logic of a doctor who says they didn’t want to alarm a patient with a cancer diagnosis, so they watched preventable death as a silent show of concern.

OpenAI built a surveillance system that scans private conversations. They bank on being able to predict. Yet they claimed after mass murder that nobody was warned of a known threat, on purpose, because such warnings would change user perception of being constantly under surveillance. But, and this is a huge one, they could have quietly cooperated with RCMP and said nothing publicly.

This is canon in big tech. You warn. You save lives. I’ve built these sausage factories as Head of Trust for the largest data storage products and know from decades on the inside. OpenAI failed basic duty.

The system detected a significant threat. Employees recognized it as serious enough to debate reporting and urged disclosure. OpenAI management overruled them to protect their market value, arguing that enabling a probable mass shooter, by burying intelligence reports, outweighed protecting the eventual victims.

That’s a cruel policy choice that prioritized company power and selfish gain over public safety. Cruelty explains why now they are announcing they detected the shooter long ago, to defend their arrogant “intelligence” reputation, so they can monetize credit for detection despite NOT helping with prevention.

They are literally up-selling detection power after the fact, emphasizing OpenAI management controls public fate, while families grieve the preventable dead.

I can not emphasize enough how this should make OpenAI directly responsible, enabling mass murder. They assumed a duty by constructing the system. The legal term is “voluntary assumption of duty”: once you undertake to act, you can be liable for doing so negligently.

OpenAI goes far beyond negligence. Either they didn’t check whether authorities already knew about this person, which is already crossing the line and negligent, or they did know and still declined, which is far worse.

The people who actually suffered unintended harm were the eight dead and twenty-five wounded. OpenAI’s framing cruelly inverts the duty of care by positioning user discomfort of being reported as equivalent to or greater than the risk of mass death.

Authorities already had multiple contacts with Van Rootselaar before the shooting, had apprehended him under the Mental Health Act more than once, and had previously removed guns from the residence. A report from OpenAI would have fit within an existing file of law enforcement. There was ZERO risk of a cold call if corroborating evidence was for an active concern. OpenAI effectively is lying in their calculated framing of who is at risk and why.

OpenAI’s entire “over-enforcement” defense collapses against the fact that RCMP already had an active file. OpenAI’s entire “we knew eight months early” should be used to shut them down.

They knew, they had the power to act, they chose not to, and now they want to be rewarded for knowing. That’s the architecture of impunity for mass murder.

Related: Judges are unable to find a jury to put OpenAI co-founder Elon Musk on trial because he is so hated for being unaccountable for crimes against humanity.

I believe it would be to the benefit of the human race for Mr. Musk to be sent to prison.

Ruben Ray Martinez was shot to death in South Padre Island on March 15, 2025, in an almost identical procedure to the execution of Renee Good.

…HSI group supervisory special agent utilized his government-issued service weapon, discharging multiple rounds at the driver through the open driver’s side window.

The news of the execution was covered locally, yet ICE buried the report. The obvious connection to ICE procedures being videoed in Minneapolis was not made until now.

On January 7, Renée Nicole Good, a 37-year-old writer and mother of three, was fatally shot by an ICE agent during an immigration operation in Minneapolis. 

Less than three weeks later, on January 24, Alex Pretti, a 37-year-old U.S. citizen and intensive care nurse, was shot and killed by Customs and Border Protection agents in Minneapolis during the same enforcement deployment. 

The video of ICE publicly executing Good lays bare the methods used on U.S. citizens. An agent stands near the front of a vehicle while he and others intentionally escalate fear, threatening and agitating the driver, then they shoot through the driver side window at close range.

An AI agent at AWS autonomously chose to delete and recreate part of its environment. 13-hour outage. Amazon’s response: “user error”.

Amazon never misses a chance to point to “AI” when it is useful to them – like in the case of mass layoffs that are being framed as replacing engineers with AI. But when a slop generator is involved in an outage, suddenly that’s just “coincidence”.

The same company rapidly cutting 30,000 jobs and telling staff AI is replacing them? AI gets credit for the layoffs but not for the outages it causes.