Porsche Stock Exhaust Cheat Repeatedly Fails Basic Test of Noise Pollution Laws

Porsche owners have poured toxins into the air for decades, with little to no liability to those harmed.

Now a groundbreaking enforcement of pollution laws seems to be honing in on noise, rather than the other forms of pollution.

Fitted with sensitive microphones, the $35,000 cameras detect and capture everything from loud exhausts and backfires to honking and blasting music. Eighty-five decibels is the threshold for receiving a fine, which starts at $800 for a first offense and rises to $2,500 for repeat offenders. For reference, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention places the average environmental noise level of city traffic inside a car at 85 decibels, indicating that City officials are targeting those who go above and beyond a normative sound level.

…[a Porsche driver thus caught making noise] was initially puzzled by the violation. Sure, he admits to hitting 35 mph in a 25 mph zone, but he wasn’t speeding excessively or wringing out the rear-mounted engine, either.

What? He thought 35 in a 25 wasn’t excessive?

Where do these people learn math? Driving 10 mph over in a 25 mph urban area is the definition of excessive.

In urban areas, driving merely 3 km/h (2 mph) or faster above the posted or implied speed limit is considered a punishable infraction…

No wonder he was puzzled why his excessive noise making was ruled excessive. This guy doesn’t care about what’s at stake when he speeds and pollutes excessively, begging laws to be enforced to protect society from such criminal acts.

And then, perhaps to nobody’s surprise, this “belief-based” anti-science guy aggressively tried in court over and over again to prove Porsche designed noise pollution as “stock” just so owners like him could cheat and get away with it.

Instead his protests have ended up proving the opposite, Porsche is failing tests every time in court for good, albeit not broad enough, safety reasons.

Specifically, research shows that prolonged sleep disruption, hearing loss, hypertension, and heart disease are all linked to consistent noise pollution. Additionally, the impacts of noise are specifically detrimental to children, yielding decreased memory, struggling reading skills, and lower test scores when consistently exposed to high levels of noise. With noise monitored by New York City’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene as well as 311 noise complaint data, the top sonic offenders in NYC are unsurprisingly traffic…

Fun fact?

Noise pollution monitoring is far safer politically to enforce than other pollution forms because… the biggest polluters (e.g. utilities like gas companies) aggressively shut down any attempts to measure their crimes.

It’s a wonder VW was caught cheating on American air pollution laws, while Exxon, Tesla, GM and Ford were not, for example. Tesla in particular lit up horribly toxic diesel pollution centers on purpose to troll regulators after VW had been caught, and I’ll bet you never even heard about it.

So this story is really about German car companies having little to no American political clout to defeat public interest safety laws that keep cities safe from known dangers.

It’s not that if he drove a Ford he would have been granted a loophole to harm, it’s that he isn’t getting any support from Porsche because they know how badly this fight to do harm ends for them.

Remember 10 years ago how Germany tried to weigh in on this noise issue internationally?

Future Porsche sports cars could get away with being almost four times noisier than regular cars while high performance versions of the BMW 3 series, Audi A4 and Mini Cooper could become almost twice as loud under German plans for weak international limits on vehicle noise. […] Transport noise is linked to 50,000 fatal heart attacks every year and 200,000 cases of cardio-vascular disease in the EU. […] At full throttle, sports cars could get away emitting over 100 decibels, equivalent to a pneumatic drill.

Well then, German car companies seem to have been headed into their infamous Diesel-Gate fiasco believing at that time they could get away with anything — that all forms of intentional pollution would be good for their brand.

Indeed, noise-polluting Porsche cheats read almost exactly like the diesel-polluting VW cheat designs.

Police chief Dieter Schäfer snitched to the authorities at the Kraftfahrt-Bundesamt (KBA), the agency responsible for certifying that vehicles comply with regulations, about the noise made by cars with sport exhaust modes. Referring to exhaust flaps, which keep performance cars quiet and in compliance with noise regulations at moderate loads but open up when drivers step on the throttle or select a performance driving mode, the police chief said, “We can’t have something certified that makes a large amount of noise in real life.”

Ah, how times have changed. Today it seems clear that American cities would be well within reason to continue to chase Porsche execs under the famous VW precedent, regarding a brand willfully attempting to violate pollution regulation.

Let’s hope this guy exposing the willful fraud of Porsche cheat-to-harm culture is going to bring them to bear in ways that will save thousands of lives or more.

AU Tesla Owner Jailed After She Claimed Her Autopilot Hit Pedestrian

The defense strategy of the accused Tesla owner was to blame her Autopilot, which she believed was designed and marketed to her to use as… wait for it… an Autopilot.

How dare she believe Autopilot meant Autopilot? She probably also believed she bought a car from a car company. Doesn’t she know CEO Elon Musk isn’t CEO Elon Musk? When nothing is real, Tesla can never be held accountable for even its most egregious crimes.

Thus, for a very simple reason, no matter how hard she tried to blame her Autopilot for its total failure to be an Autopilot, the Australian court instead swallowed an Elon Musk pill that released a fraudulent and deceptive Tesla from liability despite the clear and present design failures posing mass threat to society.

Agrawal spent two years maintaining her innocence, blaming the crash on Tesla’s autopilot feature and told police Ms Lagos “jumped in front of the car”.

But crash analysis showed Agrawal did not slow down before hitting Ms Lagos and the police investigation revealed just 30 seconds before the incident, autopilot was not turned on.

She didn’t slow down? That’s because she wasn’t paying attention, a tell-tale sign she was simply trusting what Elon Musk repeatedly had told her about her Autopilot. She was greedy, but not nearly as greedy as the true criminal in this story about advanced fee fraud.

Tesla is such a horrible and obvious fraud, that it has millions of drivers as victims utterly convinced of something false just because they paid for it in advance. This woman not only believed lies that Autopilot was a future safety device that would absolve her of risk today, she even believed lies that it was operating into the future when it wasn’t in present (because it disengaged without sufficient warning).

This case reads like a Venn diagram of liars buying from a liar who makes robots that lie.

Tesla should be banned for creating two out three circles that cause injury and death. Yet instead we see how accountability falls outside the vast majority and true causes of risk: Tesla management. The court is ignoring basically all the true causes and instead passively warning people to not buy Tesla, really to not buy Autopilot as an Autopilot, but that’s not going to solve the high threat to society fast enough.

Putting the victims of advanced fee fraud in jail doesn’t get to the heart of the crime, or stop it from spreading to many other victims.

Bottom line, if the driver had bought any other brand of car, she wouldn’t have hit a pedestrian. Without fraud there would be no Tesla.

CA Tesla Kills One in “Veered” Crash Off a Cliff

A few days ago a Chinese family searched for answers from Tesla to understand why a brand new model would suddenly veer off a cliff at high speed to kill their loved ones.

Today a similar story is in the California news.

A motorist died Tuesday after a Tesla plunged hundreds of feet down an embankment on Highway 50 in Northern California’s high Sierra, according to the California Highway Patrol. Officers were alerted to the incident just before 11:30 a.m. in which the vehicle veered off westbound lanes near a Chevron gas station several miles east of Pollock Pines near the Fresh Pond community, according to the CHP’s dispatch log. Officer Andrew Brown, a spokesman for the CHP’s Placerville office, said he didn’t immediately know what led to the Tesla crash; it was unclear if the Tesla collided with any other vehicles.

With so many cases of “veered” Tesla crashes like this, probability is high that presence of any other vehicle would have meant more tragedy. Only the Tesla driver was found harmed, nearly 400 feet down from a cliff edge.

Neuralink Co-Founder Quits, Warns of Safety Failures Such as Brain Damage

Nothing to see here, just a co-founder warning loudly of torture and brain damage risks from a company’s attempts to implant sensors.

One of the co-founders of Neuralink, Benjamin Rapoport, has departed from the Elon Musk-led brain-computer interface company due to safety concerns. […] The company relies on implanting tiny electrodes to collect data, a method Rapoport views as potentially harmful due to the risk of brain damage.

Context from history may be useful to understand the stakes, when considering a device that can prevent confidentiality and integrity of the mind.

South African Apartheid was famously destroyed by thoughts of freedom from oppression, the secret hopes and dreams of people who would defeat the Musk family dynasty (overcome tools of oppression, technology used to maintain racist power and wealth). Operation Vula by the ANC (which kept even the thoughts of Nelson Mandela safe while in jail) was thus one of the most successful anti-surveillance, anti-Musk stories in history.

Elon Musk, who fled the fall of his family’s Apartheid state in 1988 to become an illegal immigrant in America, seemingly wants to torture and implant hacked sensors into brains to rush the return of a racist dictatorship.

Stephen Bantu Biko was an anti-apartheid activist in South Africa in the 1960s and 1970s. A student leader, he later founded the Black Consciousness Movement which would empower and mobilize much of the urban black population. He was tortured to death by police as they tried to extract secrets from him.