Here is a disappointing algorithm result from the Brave Browser. First type “hottest” in the search and notice they show white women with long straight hair as the result.
If you do a similar search on Bing, it’s pretty obvious where Brave is getting their results. It’s the exact same set of pictures.
Then go back to the “autocomplete” and notice that none of it mentions women. In fact, the top suggestion is food.
Now compare that with the Bing “autocomplete”.
That seems different, right? Except here’s the thing: compare the Bing “autocomplete” on the Images tab with the All tab… and you again can see where Brave is getting their results.
So Bing clearly assumes if you switch to the Images tab, you’re needing white women in your results. Whereas if you’re on the All tab, you’re looking for climate change results.
While Brave scrapes all this Bing data, they also modify results, begging the question of accountability.
And I know you’re wondering about Google, at this point, so let’s look there next.
“Hottest” shows an even more serious security vulnerability known as a bias hole:
Bizarrely, I found “spiciest” on Google instead brings up a menu of classification.
Why doesn’t Google prompt you to select Cheetos when you search for “hottest”?
Since September 2021, officers have investigated five incidents where suspects have placed small tracking devices on high-end vehicles so they can later locate and steal them. Brand name ‘air tags’ are placed in out-of-sight areas of the target vehicles when they are parked in public places like malls or parking lots. Thieves then track the targeted vehicles to the victim’s residence, where they are stolen from the driveway.
They say the electronic key of cars are being bypassed by simply resetting to a new one.
Once inside, an electronic device, typically used by mechanics to reprogram the factory setting, is connected to the onboard diagnostics port below the dashboard and programs the vehicle to accept a key the thieves have brought with them. Once the new key is programmed, the vehicle will start and the thieves drive it away.
Police advise scanning regularly for the tiny devices, which can be hidden anywhere. They also recommend locking the “data port” to block reprogramming the key. And finally, they recommend keeping vehicles inside a locked container such as a garage.
Really, they should have said ride a bicycle: easy to notice anything added, no data port, easy to lock inside.
The story that stuck with me most came from Greg Moore, director of safe programs for the Tenderloin Community Benefit District. Last month, he was walking at Turk and Hyde streets when he saw a driver in a sport utility vehicle waiting at a red light doze off. The passenger’s head began nodding, too. The driver’s head bounced, and his eyes rolled back. Moore knew both people in the running car were overdosing. Fortunately, the passenger was able to put the car in park before passing out. Two people injected the driver with Narcan, but it didn’t work. Somebody called 911, and paramedics revived the driver, Moore said. He said he doesn’t know whether the passenger made it.
That’s nearly two corpses, on average, taken to the medical examiner’s office every day.
This is not just about one city, however, but a national expansion westward as has been predicted since at least 2016.
Over 100,000 Americans (about 10,000 in California) were killed by drug overdose in the past year. It has reached a new record high, a massive 29% increase from prior year, with over 60% of deaths by the synthetic opioid fentanyl. Meth overdose deaths went up nearly 50% at the same time. For comparison, meth overdoses in 2020 recorded far more deaths in Fresno County, California than the total combined number of homicides and suicides, one and two-vehicle crashes, fire, falls and drowning.
It’s tempting to blame China, given the economics of American consumption, yet “a primer on fentanyl(s)” debunked that right away in 2018:
…there’s nothing magical about China. India also has skilled chemists and a huge flow of mail to the U.S. So, for that matter, does Canada. And so does the U.S.; if international sources dry up, the stuff will, once again, be made here.
San Francisco is now suffering from a wave that has swept across the whole country, so the real question is whether noise from the Tenderloin will catalyze the kind of change that needs to happen at a national level.
Here’s a crime story with multiple interesting twists. Perhaps the biggest news is this part:
…former Ubiquiti developer, who has reportedly been charged with stealing data and trying to extort his employer while pretending to be a whistleblower.
Pretending to be a whistleblower in order to gain power or extort money is very serious act not least of all because it may undermine all legitimate whistleblowers.
Let me put that a different way, though. There seems to be a trend among staff attacking their employer while claiming protected status because they try to align their personal gain objectives with some greater interest.
I am reminded of people asking me about Tristan Harris’ real oppositional position to Google, as he suspiciously branded himself a whistleblower.
It seems to me he was most upset that he personally wasn’t profiting enough and given more power — to him the wrong people were getting all the money and fame. Thus Tristan charted a course for himself to get far more of that, and is primarily using his experience at Google to become famous and wealthy.
My favorite take-down of Tristan is from his not-very-ethical self-promotional movie pretending to be a documentary:
The film is really designed to showcase Tristan Harris, who probably takes up 1/3 of the screen time. Tristan made his name by being the internal “ethicist” at Google for a little while before setting out on his own to become the high prophet of “internet companies are trying to manipulate us!” But, as others have pointed out, Tristan has a habit of vastly exaggerating things, or being misleading himself. As just one example, highlighted by Antonio Garcia-Martinez in his must-read dismantling of the film, is that Harris argues that we didn’t have these same problems with earlier technologies — like the bicycle. But as Antonio points out, there was, in fact, quite a large moral panic about the bicycle…
Notably, the controversy about bicycles that “revolutionized politics” (pun presumably intended) was related to oppression and freedom of women.
Netflix failing to be in a 2020 Netflix film about companies like Netflix that do bad things, failing to include voices of women, comes across as a giant nail in Tristan’s attempted whistleblower status claim.
Shameless. But this also doesn’t change the fact that someone attacking their former employer may in fact expose them for serious mistakes.
Thus, the second notable point in the Ubiquiti crime story is a turnabout — how a supposed whistleblower has been exposed for making serious mistakes.
According to the indictment, after securing a job at another company, Sharp allegedly used his still functional privileged access to Ubiquiti’s systems at Amazon’s AWS cloud service to download large amounts of proprietary data. To cover his tracks, Sharp had used a SurfShark VPN connection to mask his real IP address. He then sent a ransom note to Ubiquiti using the same cover, demanding 25 bitcoin in exchange for a promise not to share the data. However, investigators were able to trace the downloads to Sharp because his flaky internet connection briefly failed multiple times, exposing his real IP address. And, he forgot to turn on the Kill Switch on his SurfShark VPN. By default, this is off.
As I said, you can see Ubiquiti exposed for using AWS infrastructure (infamously insecure configurations) leaving privileged access enabled for ex-staff, not to mention allowing massive extractions of data. That’s a lot of oops.
However, far more interesting in this case is Sharp being not so sharp. (They say the only criminals are dumb ones because if they’re smart they never get charged with being criminal.)
He bungled the basics of VPN configuration (likely because impatient, if not just sloppy and incompetant) after he bungled the basics of VPN purchase.
…investigators were also able to link the attacker’s VPN connection to a SurfShark account purchased with Sharp’s PayPal account.
The cost of SurfShark is so minimal, it begs the question why Sharp didn’t think to pay anonymously.
In this case, perhaps we also should ask why SurfShark markets itself for safety online while lacking any warning that it will by default expose your personal information (IP address).
In fact SurfShark warnings go the opposite direction from safety; when you enable the “kill switch” it warns your connection may be protected causing outages. It encourages you to operate less safely for the benefit of smooth connectivity.
“How to use Kill Switch” seems incredibly selfish and misleading of SurfShark (emphasizing better availability and thus fewer support calls, while failing at basic confidentiality — they had ONE job).
