Tesla’s “Driver-First” Approach: AI Staff Admit Dangerous Disregard for Safety

Tesla’s self-driving AI development takes a concerning permanent improvisation approach, prioritizing selfish and bad behavior over adherence to social good and traffic laws. Some employees reveal that the AI is intentionally trained to ignore crucial road signs and safety.

…workers said they were told to ignore “No Turn on Red” or “No U-Turn” signs, meaning they would not train the system to adhere to those signs.

“It’s a driver-first mentality,” one former worker said. “I think the idea is we want to train it to drive like a human would, not a robot that’s just following the rules.”

This “driver-first” mentality, reminiscent of the controversial “America First” nativist and racist slogan, potentially endangers road users by normalizing lawless driving behavior. It starkly contrasts with Tesla’s public claims of enhanced AI safety, exposing a troubling disconnect between the company’s marketing and its actual practices.

The consequences of this approach are already evident in the explosion (pun not intended) of Tesla AI-related traffic incidents, including fatal head-on collisions such as unexplained “veered” crashes. These tragedies underscore the risks of Tesla’s cavalier attitude against care for human lives.

As Tesla continues to promote its AI capabilities, their deliberate flouting of safety for selfish-gains raises serious questions about the company’s integrity and the true cost of its rapid technological advancements.

AL Tesla Kills One in Head-on Crash

Another day, another doctor is dead from a Tesla crash. It’s yet more evidence that medical school doesn’t teach even the most educated people how to avoid a fraudulent car brand.

According to the Opelika Police Department, on Saturday, September 7, at approximately 7:17 p.m., Opelika dispatch received a call about a multiple-vehicle crash on I-85 at the Exit 62 northbound exit ramp.

[…]

Upon arrival officers found two vehicles, a Tesla and a Toyota 4Runner, involved in the crash. Officials say the driver of the Tesla, 50-year-old Dr. Malcolm Goodchild, of Fortson, Georgia, died from his injuries at the hospital.

Source: City of Opelika

Telegram Nazi Groups Face the Music After Putin’s Puppet CEO Arrested in France

Multiple people ask me for analysis of the Telegram CEO arrest, and I have to boil it down quickly. It’s far simpler than most realize.

Putin corrupts a network of billionaires in tech firms (among other industries) to spread domestic terrorism and destabilize the world to serve his interests.

To be clear, the moment Durov stepped off his fancy Russian oligarch plane near Paris, France arrested a French citizen on French soil.

That much should be plain to see, as evidence how Putin’s sloppy foreign asset assimilation methods backfired on him.

Durov may have been better protected in France had Putin left even a shred of evidence the two were working together (as Elon Musk tends to do). On the flip side, maybe Durov was happy to abandon the Russian dictator by acquiring more formal protection in the West.

In any case, Durov’s arrest related to Telegram content moderation failures has now opened the door to further arrests and takedown of domestic terrorism groups like the Nazi “Terrorgram Collective”, which I had highlighted in my earlier post about Durov.

The gears of justice appear to be turning and closing down Putin’s spread of Nazism, at least in France and in America.

Tesla Cybertruck No Match For Thin Plastic Fence

This is a quick note on yet another serious Cybertruck design issue. Consider first, to set some context, that a website called TeslaTap has infamously leaked the following info on prior Tesla problems with leaks.

Will Leaks Happen? While EVs in general are designed not to leak for a lifetime, there are many contributors to why a leak may happen. […] Design – Parts can be poorly designed, using the wrong materials and/or unable to withstand the tough automotive environment. The LCD displays used from about 2013 through 2018 fall into this category.

They seem to mention that Tesla knowingly and repeatedly pushed bad designs to production for at least five years. What did Tesla do in response to all the leaks? Apparently nothing much. Slow response if any at all has become a hallmark of the Tesla brand of ignorance and science denial.

Consider next, that I also wrote about a critical door striker design failure the other day, which seems to have no response from Tesla at all.

So, here we go again.

It is an understatement in 2024 that the massively over-hyped and under-designed “survivability” Cybertruck is manifestly “unable to withstand the automotive environment“.

Apparently just a little bumping and the coolant hoses come popping, dumping fluid out like the Cybertruck needs a diaper (as opposed to just being one). While one owner complained bitterly about it, they strangely didn’t seem upset when they discovered the exact cause — a design error. The coolant hose fix (reset and clamp) is so trivial as to reveal just how poorly this tragic vehicle was designed and made.

But, when it comes to coolant leaks, it gets much worse.

A cohort of self-described “Alpha males” (e.g. toddlers) exhibit behavior indicative of stunted emotional development, deeply entrenched in a dubious mythology of Cybertruck marketing. These emotionally undeveloped men, seemingly desperate for validation, devise “tests” to demonstrate their allegiance to the vehicle’s “father” figure.

Such misguided attempts to gain favor with Elon Musk, an individual whose own maturity is obviously stunted, ultimately prove futile. The Cybertruck’s awful performances, beset by numerous technical and design flaws, fails to meet even basic expectations. Its shortcomings serve as a stark illustration of the disconnect between marketing claims that amount to fraud, and well-known practical automotive engineering realities.

The result is a cascade of Cybertruck owner disappointments, affecting both the vehicle maker and even its most ardent supporters. This very “American idiot” outcome underscores the pitfalls of allowing unthinking adherence to dictated propaganda and the dangers of vulnerable people falsely conflating product capability with a Potemkin-like personal identity.

Spoiler alert:

That’s not supposed to happen. The Tesla Cybertruck pukes up its coolant from an unshielded radiator less than a foot off the ground.

And how did this radiator end up so obviously broken? Notice in the full video how a Cybertruck carefully avoids the one actual fence post at the end of the show, after it tries so hard to hit only thin sheets of plastic masquerading as a fence.

The design and performance deficiencies of the Cybertruck become glaringly apparent to those with even rudimentary engineering knowledge or automotive industry experience. The vehicle’s numerous shortcomings highlight a fundamental lack of understanding of basic automotive design principles.

For instance, the inclusion of an oversized bull bar equipped with excessive lighting, while simultaneously lacking a crucial underbody skid plate, exemplifies a prioritization of aesthetics over functional off-road capability. The widely circulated video of the vehicle breaching a thin, presumably prop-constructed fence fails to provide any meaningful data about its structural integrity or real-world performance.

These superficial attempts at demonstrating the Cybertruck’s capabilities only serve to underscore its engineering inadequacies. Any rigorous testing regimen would likely reveal the need for extensive redesigns or complete replacement of major components, as the vehicle appears to disregard fundamental engineering principles in favor of unconventional styling.

Potential owners would be better served by investing their resources in vehicles that have undergone proper engineering and testing processes, rather than being swayed by marketing spectacles that bear little relation to practical automotive functionality. Selling a giant stainless steel diaper made by Tesla isn’t helping anyone, as its buyers should be spending their time and money in therapy instead.

Tesla have been known for years to fail catastrophically before 10,000 miles, yet people still fall victim to the fraud.

Sales of the Cybertruck are becoming evidence of a mental health crisis in America, rising to a national security issue. We test for vulnerabilities in other areas, so as a simple test in this domain please show the below Elon Musk email to people you care about. See who is prone to become victims to a criminal scam:

LEGO and soda cans. I’m surprised he didn’t mention fruit cups.

Over and again I see Tesla fraud victims cry out “I love the [deception]… What should I do next” as if they are in so deep they can’t stop digging themselves into more and more debt.

Like this:

And this:

Who will help these child-like unfortunates who run loose and keep getting themselves caught up in Tesla fraud, throwing hundreds of thousands of dollars away? If not governmental regulators, if not their parents, then who?

Cybertruck Owner Brags About High-Tech Pedal That Makes Vehicle Accelerate When Pressed

The fence in this video thus is a striking metaphor, as it stopped the child from doing even more predictable damage to himself and his environment. The lesson for America is perhaps that better fences earlier (in life) can prevent such disasters.

Without fraud, there would be no Tesla.