Pirate Party

This news has been slowly percolating through the Internet:

The Pirate Party aims to take up the roll of maintaining a balance of power after the 2006 election. There are between 800,000 and 1,100,000 active file swappers in Sweden, and they are all tired of being called criminals. We need to have 225 000 of them with us to cross the four percent threshold and land in the roll of power balance.

To get one fourth of a criminalized and angry mob with us is far from unachievable. It is that which we shall achieve in the coming nine months.

Democracy in action, or should I say “populism” of the progressives. The question is whether a common voice can really survive without investor capital and a marketing department. If this goes anywhere near as far as linux, then ten years from now we might just have to say “amazing that parties that represent normal dedicated people manage to compete with other parties that have strong corporate backers”.

The goal is to create a political one-issue party centered around the abolishment of copyright as we know it along with most IP laws in Sweden by getting into the parliament in this year’s elections.

Secondary, but equally important goals are to strengthen personal integrity by rejecting the EU “eavesdropping” directive and expand the “postal secret act” to include all forms of communication, regardless of carrier technology.

Someone had to point out, of course, that the Pirate Party webserver was running a licensed copy of Windows 2003.

Burglar Steals Squad Car

Funny. Reuters reports today that a burglar in Germany, who had just been booked at the Eschwege station, grabbed the keys to a squad car during his interrogation and drove away.

Apparently the police noticed him leaving in the car but the burglar still tried to escape chase. Insult to injury or just a chance to get away?

To put this in perspective, Reuters also reported today that Vice President Cheney directly authorized his aide to “use classified material to discredit a critic of the Bush administration’s Iraq war effort”. Cheney was engaged “in an effort to counteract diplomat Joe Wilson’s charge that the Bush administration twisted intelligence on Iraq’s nuclear weapons to justify the 2003 invasion.”

Wilson charged the Bush administration with manipulation of the truth. Rather than prove themselves innocent of manipulation, the Bush administration dug in further and did it again. The question now is who is authorized to chase them down and take the keys away before more innocent people get hurt?

RSA badge fees

Here is a pet-peeve of mine with RSA: they seem unable to use a simple revocation system for their conference badges. This has led to increasing fees for lost badges, over the years, and I just received a notice that shows they have really lost it:

Treat your badge like a prized possession- replacing it will cost $1895, the price of Full Conference registration!

How can a security company that specializes in tokens and identity management be forced to resort to huge fees as a disincentive/control? A simple revocation system would make the lost badge invalid and a nominal fee for the cost of replacement seems reasonable. Charging the price of full and late registration just says “hello, we don’t have any security to stop lost/stolen badges”.

And that’s not even to go into the whole mess of what people might do now if they see a badge on the floor, or hanging precariously from someone’s pocket. How many “prized possessions” do you wear that are worth almost $2000K?! It’s no longer a useless piece of identification but a form of currency that you hang boldly around your neck. Imagine a call to the San Jose police where you report a mugging or felony-theft of your *ahem* conference badge.

This is just nuts (even if the badges are not controlled by RSA). I simply can not imagine how RSA sees this as a positive development for their branding. Here’s a hint of a better way: include the cost of an RSA fob for the full conference attendees and charge them a fob cost for replacement. This has the obvious advantage of not only being safer and more secure, but it could lead to test feedback and perhaps even fob innovation.

The state of Los Angeles

Smog Layer Amazing. The New York Times reported that more than a quarter of the smog in Los Angeles is generated in China, and it may soon increase to a third or more. This reminds me of two things, the death of the German forests due to acid rain and the supposed fall-out down-wind (e.g. the jetstream flows from Asia into the US) from nuclear warfare. Looking out the plane window last evening I couldn’t help but notice a thick brown layer hovering over LA. For some reason that reminded me of noisy drunk Bulgarians smoking profusely as we shared cabins on a train out of Denmark. If I hunched over far enough (waist-height) I found I could keep my head just below the dense hovering smoke, but it was uncomfortable and still smelled bad.

Soup of Los Angeles The mish-mash of developments also stood out as vastly different than the old science fiction predictions of gleaming lights and shiny buildings all competing for your attention in a dark pitch. Instead I found myself gazing across a bland grey-brown mish-mash; unremarkable features crammed together to form a meaningless and seemingly infinite series of criss-cross homes, warehouses, and roads. The future may not be so much about confidentiality as simple integrity. An overwhelming amount of data can create a kind of secrecy, but the ability to find meaning in the mess is likely to be seriously threatened.

Unusually open road in LAAnd that brings me to driving in LA. The new GPS navigation tools are far superior to their predecessors. I was able to punch in my destination and then sit back as a soothing european-accented cyber-female voice kept me on track, “left, then right, then left, then right again”. An impossible maze with some of the worst drivers in the world, yet my navigator was able to present meaningful data with only two minor mistakes. The locals fervently try to wash their vehicles into a gleaming and shiny spot of pride, but in reality nothing really stands out other than the ongoing sea of brake-lights and street lamps. A vehicle itself fails to give anything lasting or meaningful (aside from the hidden engineering), especially when compared to a clean park with a fountain, or the ability to actually see clouds and stars. But don’t try to tell that to Jay Leno…

The danger from this awful crisis of data and over-vehicularization seems to have compelled the LA police to consider firing sticky-GPS units at fleeing motorists. The LA Times reports that this is expected to end high-speed car chases. I would expect that countermeasures might be fairly easy to develop, like driving away, jumping out and tossing the locator onto another vehicle, and then continuing to drive.

A small number of patrol cars will be equipped with the compressed air launchers, which fire the miniature GPS receiver in a sticky compound resembling a golf ball, for four to six months as a trial.

Maybe the thing has some fancy hooks or a harpoon-like barb to prevent removal…if not, than I don’t expect a revolution from this technology, especially if a motorcyclist is fleeing. It may help in a few cases initially, but the idea of disabling the electronics on a getaway car seems far more effective to me (particularly since it halts the vehicle and therefore lessens the threat to innocent bystanders down the road). I can see where they are headed, and it begs the question of whether they are trying to fix the symptom rather than address the root causes. Several times last night I was over-taken by squads of squad cars on their way to something urgent and it brought to mind that it is often better to fix the leaky roof than to innovate with mop technology.