AOL apologizes, faces lawsuit

The Register has noted that AOL apologized for exposing the search data from their users:

“This was a screw-up, and we’re angry and upset about it,” AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein said, AP reports. “It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools, but it was obviously not appropriately vetted, and if it had been, it would have been stopped in an instant.”

That is close to what I had expected would come out of this, as I mentioned before. But the apology is unlikely to cool the jets of the EFF, which has filed a complaint with the FTC. Perhaps most embarassing to AOL is the fact that the EFF is accusing them of violating their stated Privacy Policy. They are also arguing that AOL should not be allowed to store more than 14 days worth of search records on users. And that makes me wonder if AOL might eventually offer an interface like Scroogle for those who want to opt-out of AOL’s analytics/tracking.

TSA considers more profiling

In an article with the sensationalist title “Report: X-rays don’t detect explosives” released by the Associated Press, I found some encouraging nuggets of information about the latest TSA plans for increased security:

Among the changes the TSA is considering, according to TSA spokeswoman Ellen Howe:

_Hire more people to take baggage-handling responsibilities from screeners so the screeners can focus on security responsibilities.

_Have screeners, instead of contract employees hired by airlines, check IDs and boarding passes.

_Expand a program that trains screeners to look for unusual behavior in passengers that might indicate malicious intent. Called SPOT — Screening Passengers by Observation Technique — it’s used in at least 12 airports, Howe said.

Seems like an excellent plan to me, but will they be able to pull it off?

Those changes may require approval by Congress and agreement with airports and the airline industry, which might have to bear some of the cost, Howe said.

The airlines might go along with the plan, an industry spokesman said.

“We favor this proposal provided it doesn’t add costs to the carriers,” said David Castelveter, spokesman for the Air Transport Association.

Odd. One would think that the Air Transport Association would see that overall costs go down, and ridership goes up, if you have a more effective profiling and screening process. Makes you wonder how much of the security policy is determined by lobbyists and politicians with conflicting motives (e.g. want to sell more x-ray machines, or just believe that technology is the answer).

This reminds me of a conversation I overheard the other day: A young woman said “We get a box of fresh produce delivered from local farmers to our doorstep now. It’s really great, don’t you think?” An elderly woman asked in response “Is it organic?” The young woman started to say “Yes, it…” when the elderly woman cut her off and said “A worm in every bite, if that’s what you mean by great. I’d rather have pesticides any day than those worms you find in organic food.” I couldn’t help but wonder if the elderly woman might be an elected official backed by the pesticide industry, since who else could believe that organic food has a worm in every bite and all pesticides are good for you? Maybe she hasn’t seen the EPA site with sections like “Ways to reduce risks to children from pesticides”, or comes from a time before childrens’ health was thought to be at risk.

New airline security impacts flight attendants

I have not seen any reports on how the new security regulations impact flight attendants. I started to wonder about it so I did some checking and found out that flights to/from London have not allowed attendants to bring bags on board. This means that they are working without anything more than their apron and notepad. Moreover, unlike their old method of racing from the plane to hotel, they now have to wait in the baggage claim area, which adds several hours to their workday. And finally, the TSA and airlines have had to discuss how to compensate the attendants for the toiletries, makeup and other items they need to purchase each trip when the new security rules force them to throw it away.

Perhaps someone is reporting on this, but so far I have not found it in the news.

The massacre of the Cathars

The Wikipedia has a fair amount of information on the Cathars that seems fairly well written. I noted in particular a description of habits and beliefs that upset the Catholic organization:

The slaying of life was abhorrent to the Cathars, just as was the senseless copulation that produced enslavement in matter. Consequently, abstention from all animal food except fish was enjoined of the Perfecti. (The Perfecti apparently avoided eating anything considered to be a by-product of sexual reproduction, including cheese, eggs, milk and butter.) War and capital punishment were also absolutely condemned, an abnormality in the medieval age.

Such teachings, both theological and practical, brought upon the Cathars firm condemnation from the religious authorities whose social order they threatened.

It is amazing to take a careful look at life under Count of Toulouse Raymond VI as he was the ruler in an area with a fairly civilized and yet secular and prospering community. Other sites paint a compelling portrait:

Chivalry and poetry, art and literature, and business and commerce thrived, the land was at peace, the people prospered; Jew, Cathar, Waldensian, and Catholic lived and worked side by side in an area free of religious persecution and dominated by religious tolerance. People were judged on their own merits, not by the religious beliefs to which they subscribed. Secular offices were distributed on the basis of merit, not religion, and powerful offices in the state were open to Jew, Cathar, Waldensian, and Catholic alike.

This was the time and place of the Troubadour poets, influenced by the Sufi poets to the south as well as the Kabbalists. They sang and spoke of the idealized female and unattainable love, and recognized women as spiritually equal; perhaps even as divine. In fact, women even could become a Perfecti!

Things went south (pun not intended) from increasing pressure from the Pope who became outraged at the Cathars prosperity. He demanded they submit to the Catholic establishment’s authority and he sent representatives to negotiate their surrender. Sadly, one of the representatives was murdered while visiting Raymond. This led to excommunication of Raymond and eventually a Papal decree that the land and wealth of the region was fair game to Catholics who wanted to take it by force for themselves. From the Wikipedia again:

The crusader army came under the command, both spiritual and military, of the papal legate Arnaud-Amaury, Abbot of Cîteaux. In the first significant engagement of the war, the town of Béziers was taken on 22 July 1209. Arnaud, the Cistercian abbot-commander is said to have been asked how to tell Cathar from Catholic. His reply, recorded by a fellow Cistercian, was “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eis.” — “Kill them all, the Lord will recognise His ownâ€?. The doors of the church of St Mary Magdalene were broken down and the occupants slaughtered. 7,000 people died there including women and children. Elsewhere in the town many more thousands were mutilated and killed. Prisoners were blinded, dragged behind horses, and used for target practice. The town was razed. Arnaud, the abbot-commander, wrote to his master, the Pope: “Today your Holiness, twenty thousand citizens were put to the sword, regardless of rank, age, or sex.â€? The population of Béziers was then probably no more than 15,000 but with local refugees seeking shelter within the city walls, the number claimed, 20,000, is possible.

Raymond had anticipated the invasion to a degree and apparently tried to negotiate, but his efforts failed to stop the crusaders from taking Béziers. The town apparently had only a few hundred Cathars, but the decision to stand together meant the whole population was massacred. This crusade continued for more than twenty years. Raymond tried also to comply with the demands of the Pope and crusaders over time to achieve their forgiveness, such as turning-over his seven best strongholds and his mercenaries or removing all Jews from positions of power, but the Catholic authority simply tortured him with his own desire and acquiesence. Eventually, against some resistance, hundreds of thousands of soldiers were sent by the Pope to “convert” or kill the people of Languedoc, and the poetic and peaceful Cathars were completely destroyed.

the poetry of information security