Citizen surveillance and teen pranks

Just in case you weren’t already worried about the government using surveillance to monitor you, now you have to wonder about your neighbors. To be fair, this is a story about a family that was trying to track down the people that maliciously defaced their property. Not surprising, then, that they used everything they could to find the perpetrators.

What appeared to be a common teenage prank has led to felony vandalism charges against a handful of Norco teens.

They toilet-papered the wrong house — the home of a woman unwilling to let them get away with it.

After months of investigation and suspect interviews — spurred on by homeowner Katja Base’s own investigating skills — Norco sheriff’s deputies sent the case to the Riverside County district attorney’s office to decide whether to charge the teens and one adult.

That all seems fairly straightforward, but what’s really interesting is the data they actually managed to get for their investigation:

Katja Base decided she couldn’t expect sheriff’s deputies to work around the clock on a toilet-paper investigation. Armed only with two sneaker imprints on wads of moist toilet paper, she started her sleuthing. She persuaded store managers to average daily toilet-paper purchases for the week to spot the anomalies.

Just two days before the vandals struck, Stater Bros. on Hamner Avenue had a run on bathroom tissue.

The store manager reviewed the day’s receipts to find who bought so much toilet paper.

At 7:30 p.m. Feb. 17, someone bought 144 rolls of toilet paper, cheese, dog food, flour and plastic forks — the same items that ended up on Base’s house and lawn. The cash transaction left no easy way to trace the purchaser, but Base was on a roll. She asked if the store had video surveillance.

The footage showed four teenagers making the purchase: one of them wore a Norco High School letterman’s jacket with a name stitched across the back. The store’s parking-lot surveillance camera caught the truck the kids were driving.

Norco sheriff deputies didn’t take long to figure out who was responsible.

However, when the case stalled, Base nudged it along. She borrowed a Norco High yearbook and used online databases to get the name spellings, phone numbers and addresses of the kids on the store tape.

Seems like a case of her becoming a deputy or at least a concerned-citizen and helping carry along the investigation, with the blessing of her local law enforcement agency, in the interest of justice.

VW Crafter Thatcham 1 Alarm

The new VW cargo van, called the Crafter, boasts a lower insurance level because of the inclusion of an immobilizer and alarm. It also has some cutting-edge diesel powerplant and design features.

Thatcham provides some interesting press documents related to the 2006 British Insurance “Car Security Awards”, which gives some background and explains how the Crafter benefits from having their equipment as standard:

The security ratings in NVSR (New Vehicle Security Ratings) take no account of the relative cost of different makes/models or of any differences in perceived or actual attractiveness to car thieves. They are purely design based and take account of the following:

For “theft”

* Ignition/steering column lock
* Peripheral locks and mechanisms
* Electronic security system (alarm and immobiliser systems)
* Vehicle identification
* Secondary mechanical immobilisation system
* Glazing
* Key/component management
* Additional security features (e.g. locking rear seats and/or storage areas)
* Key duplication, key code information – one star deducted if unsatisfactory

For “theft from”

* Peripheral locks and mechanisms
* Alarm system
* ICE and in car electronics
* Glazing
* Key/component management
* Additional security features (e.g. locking rear seats and/or storage areas)
* Key duplication, key code information and road wheel and spare security – one star deducted if unsatisfactory

Has anyone rated your car’s security system?

History of electrified rail in America

I’ve written before about the privatization and dismantling of Los Angeles electrified railways. The city might someday serve as a case-study of methods used by petroleum companies to ruin the competition. But even more shocking is the story (pun not intended) suggested by this book review that claims America’s capability to sustain electrified railways nationwide took a tumble during the 1960s:

For most of the first half of the 20th century the United States led the way in railroad electrification. Before the outbreak of World War II, the country had some 2,400 route-miles and more than 6,300 track-miles operating under electric power, far more than any other nation and more than 20 percent of the world’s total. In almost every instance, electrification was a huge success. Running times were reduced. Tonnage capacities were increased. Fuel and maintenance costs were lowered, and the service lives of electric locomotives promised to be twice as long as those of steam locomotives. Yet despite its many triumphs, electrification of U.S. railroads failed to achieve the wide application that once was so confidently predicted. By the 1970s, it was the Soviet Union, with almost 22,000 electrified route-miles, that led the way, and the U.S. had declined to 17th place.

It’s OBVIO!

These sound like fun little cars, soon to be shipping to the US from Brazil. Even the top gasoline powered sports cars will be left in the dust. Shame there isn’t anything comperable made in America:

OBVIO!

OBVIO! has a strategic partnership with California automobile distributor ZAP, which has agreed to be the exclusive North American distributor and has pre-purchased 50,000 OBVIO! units. The initial versions of the 828 and 012 car designs will be flex-fueled, and will go into production in 2007.

[…]

The preliminary specifications for the OBVIO! electric cars include a range of 200 to 240 miles, with acceleration from 0 to 60 mph of less than 4.5 seconds and a top speed of 120 mph. A 39 kWh lithium-ion battery system will power the 120 kW (160 hp), 220 Nm (162 lb-ft) electric motor.

A full normal recharge will take five hours, with a fast charge taking two hours. A 30-minute quick charge will provide a 20 to 50 mile range.

And if you’re really a performance nut, then the new Lotus-built electric car, said to be three times more efficient than fuel cell technology, is the one for you.

Tesla Motors unveiled its much-anticipated all-electric two-seater roadster. The lithium-ion battery powered sportscar features a 248hp (185 kW) electric motor that accelerates the car from 0 to 60 in four seconds. Built by Lotus for Tesla, the Roadster has a range of about 250 miles and a top speed of 130 mph.

[…]

When we calculate the well-to-wheel energy efficiency of [the best fuel-cell demonstration] Honda experimental car, we get 0.57 km/MJ x 61% = 0.35 km/MJ, not even as good as the ordinary diesel Volkswagen Jetta, let alone the gasoline-powered Honda Civic VX or the Honda Insight hybrid car

Wow, fuel-cells might never happen if diesel and electric are already superior technology and available today. What were the American car companies thinking by pushing so hard for fuel-cell when it’s clearly too far away to be practical? GM and Ford are facing the dust-bin of history for their incredible short-sighted management. Will they be forced to beg the government for a bail-out package? Since they’ve exported so many jobs, who would the government really be helping? And what will happen to all the American performance-oriented gasoline cars just being brought to market; perhaps the same thing that happened to race, sport and draught horses?

Interesting to compare the situation with South Africa where the use of incentives and penalties might be used to help consumers make a better decision about the false-hope of inefficient petroleum engines:

The government might have to consider imposing penalties to curb the rapid growth in sales of 4x4s and off-road vehicles, which have risen despite the soaring fuel price, according to Nhlanhla Gumede, the chief director of hydrocarbons in the department of minerals and energy.

“The idea of a penalty on people buying guzzlers came up two years ago, but we did not take it further because we wanted a system that would run itself without government, but it is something we would have to consider in future,” he said.