Chewing as a Sign of Weakness

I noticed a book in a store the other day that claimed to be a reprint of the WWII US Army guide to Iraqi culture. I should have bought it, as the topic keeps coming into focus lately. Wired wrote about this as well and even attempted to show dismay with some of the suggestions. Maybe I’ll go back.

In the meantime, I have been reading anecdotes about how the modern Army wants to be culturally savvy, but just does not seem able to understand how to influence local populations in a positive way.

Identity is a funny thing. A Glimpse of Iraq points out a classic example of how two cultures in sudden proximity might end up with dangerously opposite perspectives:

It is probably perfectly normal for an adult American to be seen chewing gum in public. In traditional Iraqi society, the act of chewing a gum is reserved to women, but never in public. Country folk utterly despise city boys when they see them chewing gum. They regard it as feminine. Even little children are discouraged from doing it. The sight of grown, armed men chewing gum must have been one of the causes of many people losing their respect for those armed men! It simply conveys an unintentionally ‘undesirable’ image!

This also reminds me of a young US soldier manning the Iraqi side of the Iraqi-Jordanian border. He glanced at our passports with a lollypop in his mouth. I couldn’t help but notice the reaction on the taxi driver’s face: Utter contempt!

While an American might see a calm, collected, even playful and welcoming person, and Iraqi might see a scared, weak and disrespectful one. Then again, many Americans see chewing gum as disrespectful as well, the difference thus only being the environment. In other words, an American soldier manning a border might not be trained to respect the normal people who might try to cross, whereas they are most certainly trained to respect a superior officer and respect their military buildings.

Although it is tempting to chalk up the gum as a matter of cultural differences in a general sense, I think it may in fact be a reflection of very poor management by the American military. Soldiers have been given specific instructions on how to kill but perhaps not yet how to treat foreign civilians with respect. The interesting question becomes whether the latter has as much security relevance as the former; especially as it might be too late, or too costly, to turn back public opinion.

Majority of children robbed at school

Interesting report. Do you think this means generation Z will be more or less adverse to security than generations Y and X?

Director Frances Crook said children were rarely consulted about “the impact of crime on their lives”.

“The surveys revealed that these crimes are often not reported as children think adults will not listen to them or the crime will be viewed as too small to bother with,” she added.

“Ironically, the very institutions where children should feel safest – their school environments set up and patrolled by adults – are where children are most commonly victimised.

I am not sure I would agree with the conclusion.

I certainly never thought of school as an environment where I should feel safest; the opposite actually. I felt safest at home, where I was not forced to be in close proximity with strangers regulated only by even stranger rules and weak control systems that everyone seemed to know how to circumvent.

Something tells me that the “findings” are heavily weighted by an adult agenda to impose stricter controls under the guise of a “silent request” for safety. Strangely, the report does not discuss any trend over the period surveyed.

Every year, between 1997 and 2006, the survey asked children about their experiences of crime in the previous twelve months.

I mean there should be some data on whether there was an increase or decrease in the rate of criminal activity in the schools, no? 1997 to 2006 seems like an awfully short period as well. Why not survey adults about their experiences as a child — experiences of crime in the previous twenty/thirty years? Perhaps that would eliminate the error from lack/fear of reporting?

I suspect the bully effect is as old as the concept of the playground itself, so the question really should not be whether there are bullies or not but what are the appropriate (most successful?) controls among children as well as between them and adults. Perhaps there are simple ways to resolve some of the problems that do not require greater adult intervention and/or surveillance?

Stop all the clocks

by W.H. Auden

Stop all the clocks, cut off the telephone,
Prevent the dog from barking with a juicy bone,
Silence the pianos and with muffled drum
Bring out the coffin, let the mourners come.

Let aeroplanes circle moaning overhead
Scribbling on the sky the message He Is Dead,
Put crepe bows round the white necks of the public doves,
Let the traffic policemen wear black cotton gloves.

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

The stars are not wanted now: put out every one;
Pack up the moon and dismantle the sun;
Pour away the ocean and sweep up the wood.
For nothing now can ever come to any good.

I keep thinking about the ongoing noise of industrialism, the blaring pipes and mufflers of the brand-conscious consumerists, and wondering why silence is associated with mourning. At what point does the battle to outdo each other in noise become so overwhelming that it takes on the persona of despair and silence becomes the song of joyfulness? On the other hand, silence is given out of respect, so is noise a means of taunting and disrespect?

One thing is still for certain, while silence is power and comes from control, noise comes from a lack of control.

BART started work on its tracks between El Cerrito and Richmond earlier this week in an effort to quiet a high-pitched squeal grinding on residents’ nerves, according to a spokesman for the transit agency.

A machine that fixes noisy tracks at a rate of one-tenth of a mile each day is scheduled to work the line from Albany to Richmond, spokesman Linton Johnson said.

The work started after complaints mounted the past year, he said. The machine smoothes tiny ripples that form on the track over time, causing the noise when trains roll by.

Smell is another matter entirely, although Benjamin Franklin apparently did his part to discuss the two and recommend solutions. But seriously, on a related note (pun not intended), I found an interesting study in Biology Letters about crickets who silenced themselves to survive:

On the Hawaiian Island of Kauai, more than 90% of male field crickets (Teleogryllus oceanicus) shifted in less than 20 generations from a normal-wing morphology to a mutated wing that renders males unable to call (flatwing). Flatwing morphology protects male crickets from the parasitoid, which uses song to find hosts, but poses obstacles for mate attraction, since females also use the males’ song to locate mates. Field experiments support the hypothesis that flatwings overcome the difficulty of attracting females without song by acting as ‘satellites’ to the few remaining callers, showing enhanced phonotaxis to the calling song that increases female encounter rate. Thus, variation in behaviour facilitated establishment of an otherwise maladaptive morphological mutation.

Would humans have to adapt their mating behavior to compensate for a more quiet life? Imagine a night out that shuns loudness, but instead emphasizes silence, or even the delicacy of sound. Could muscle-car drivers, truckers and bikers survive without loud pipes? Will quality of sound ever supplant quantity at parties? No mourning, just joy at the beauty of quiet time. I predict that in the next ten years, quiet will become increasingly valued.

The Markets React to America’s Declining Security

The safety of Americans has lessened dramatically since Bush took office. This is perhaps reflected most clearly in the numbers of investors dropping the dollar from their portfolio. There is a lot of irony in the fact that the oil barons who are close friends of the President are the ones looking to reduce their risk of association:

Qatari Prime Minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr al-Thani said on US TV that the government-backed $50bn Qatari Investment Authority (QIA) now had less than 40 per cent of its investments in dollars, down from a high two years ago of 99 per cent.

The fast-growth emerging markets are also stepping back. That’s a stunning decline. One question worth considering is whether this is good for big business partners in America, the ones who back the Republican campaigners, as they have diverse overseas investments to reduce their own risk. And if so, does the increased risk position these big corporatists into an even more powerful buy strategy while the domestic/smaller populist companies are left vulnerable.