Interesting study of how security can often be about incentives (the carrot) as much as the penalties (stick):

A Zambian man has won a prestigious Goldman Prize for helping to curb widespread elephant poaching by setting up economic projects for villagers.

Hammerskjoeld Simwinga wins $125,000 for the award, sometimes called the Nobel prize for the environment.

He helped set up bee-keeping and fish-farming projects for people in the North Luangwa valley, where elephant numbers had shown a dramatic fall.

Falling elephants? But seriously, there are some neat cultural details to the story:

Over 70% of loans are made to women and Mr Simwinga says they are the backbone of the programme.

“We deliberately pushed our resources to the womenfolk in the community because we knew that working with the women was the strongest part of persuasion,” he told Reuters news agency.

Local communities were given a grinding mill to earn money but this was withdrawn if elephants were poached in the area.

Brilliant security solutions customized to local conditions. It gives me hope that someone might be able to save others under threat of attack.

US-CERT has released a draft of the “security essential body of knowledge” (EBK).

IT Security Competency Areas (Definitions and Functions)
2.1 Data Security
2.2 Digital Forensics
2.3 Enterprise Continuity
2.4 Incident Management
2.5 IT Security Training and Awareness
2.6 IT Systems Operations and Maintenance
2.7 Network Security and Telecommunications
2.8 Personnel Security
2.9 Physical and Environmental Security
2.10 Procurement
2.11 Regulatory and Standards Compliance
2.12 Risk Management
2.13 Strategic Management
2.14 System and Application Security

Fourteen? Maybe they wanted to differentiate from all the other guides that seem to revolve around a dozen. The authors are requesting comments now.

From the sounds of it, the US Air Force is being corrupted by fundamentalists. The Colorado Air Force base of operations is at risk from a fundie base nearby:

The fact that Colorado Springs is home to some of America’s most powerful evangelical Christian organisations has exacerbated the situation, [Captain Melinda Morton] said.

“Many of them have particular goals when it comes to people in uniform, that they are there to teach and encourage those folks to use their power and their position in the military,” she added.

Focus on the Family – perhaps the most powerful lobbying organisation on the Christian right – is over the road from the academy.

The complaints include some pretty sad examples of hate speech:

One man leading the charge is Mikey Weinstein, a graduate of the academy who served in the Reagan White House.

His eldest son is also a graduate, and his youngest son had been there just a few months when he complained of abuse from evangelical cadets.

Mr Weinstein said his son had complained of being called an “f-ing Jew” and was told Jews were responsible for “executing Jesus”.

It’s not about differences in belief or religion, though; this is about an institution that is not protecting its members from the hate and intolerance espoused by the fundies.

Mr Weinstein said 117 people had given him examples of abuse. Only eight of them were Jewish, he said – the rest were Catholics, Baptist, Lutheran, Episcopal, Presbyterian and Methodist.

“They’re not used to being preyed upon… by their evangelical brothers and sisters. But that’s exactly what’s happening.”

Mr Weinstein believes that some senior officers are so heavily involved in a culture of intolerance – and the rest are so blase about what is going on – that the entire academy leadership should be replaced.

The double-talk of fundies is not hard to find. They come out swinging, trying to call their hate speech and bullying the equivalent of rational discourse:

“Liberal movements in America treat people like they’re stupid,” said [Ted Haggard] whose national prominence means that he talks to President George W Bush most weeks.

“Are we saying that we want those students to understand representative government… but they can’t understand religious discussion?”

This guy is obviously lost. He confuses hate speech with regular discussion.

People are saying that religious discussion is different from hate speech. Calling someone a f-ing anything and accusing them of historic crimes based on their race, religion, creed etc. violate the principles of free speech. The idea that hate and prejudice would be able to infiltrate a secular institution on the premise of religious discussion…now that treats people like they are stupid. It will be interesting to see if the Air Force can pass this test of tolerance and representation by controlling the fundies; and even if they do pass the first test of representative government whether they then can pass the test of executive branch outsourcing to militant fundie contractors like Blackwater. Apparently Blackwater has just purchased a ship to start its navy operations…maybe planes are next.