First, in terms of disclosure, let me just get out of the way that I don’t prefer Android or iOS. They’re both too centrally managed for my taste. Call me a deviant hacking anti-communist if you must but I’m a fan of Linux on my handset, which is why I keep buying the awesome Nokia N9 and building/flashing it on my own.
Going to South Korea? Well pop a local South Korean telcom firmware on your N9 and look like a native with all those cool feature “defaults”. When you get home replace it with a Northern European vanilla firmware that’s as clean and clear as the icy waters of Trondheim. That’s the N9. Unlocked as unlocked can be, by default.
The closest thing on Android is the Cyanogenmod. A while ago I made a small business out of buying and reselling Android phones that wiped, replaced the firmware and opened up. It wasn’t for the money but rather for the liberation of the phones and their users (for comparison I also used to pull bicycles out of dumpsters, refurbish them and then leave them on the street to get more people riding). The Motorola Defy was my favorite to set free but even Cyanogenmod didn’t feel big and open enough compared to straight Linux.
At least Cyanogenmod exists. Liberating an Apple phone has been a sordid and messy game that has little upside other than showmanship and to refute Jobs. The Apple icon shifted from admitting to being a fan of stealing ideas to viciously threatening anyone who tried to “steal” his. It’s odd, especially when you consider that his highly-successful OSX is a BSD variant.
That being said, it wasn’t hard for me to predict that Android would eat Apple in the market. Earlier this year I mentioned “iOS struggles against Linux phones” but here’s what I said in October of 2010 when it looked clear that Google would rocket past Apple
iPhone losing OS fight
Today, here’s what TC says the real experts think.
The latest numbers are in: Android is on top, followed by iOS in a distant second.
This word comes from Gartner, a top research firm for these sorts of things. Overall, within the last quarter, Android outsold iOS devices nearly three to one while capturing 64% of the worldwide market share. Samsung was the top dog accounting for 90M handset sales.
There is no denying Android’s dominance anymore. There is no way even the most rabid Apple fanboy can deny that iOS is in second place now. Android is winning.
While so many others were talking about how iOS made them “feel” special the platform was just too proprietary to be a long-term bet. People may as well been telling me that the iSeries and OS400 were going to take over the world. Microsoft Windows and all that. Battle impact? Yes, of course. QSECOFR was a great thing. Long-term war victory? No.
The fact is that economics and politics in history indicate the majority of people eventually choose freedom over specific functionality. As much as some apologize for and say this or that “brilliant” dictatorship could have kept going (e.g. Mussolini made the trains run on time)…information likes to be free and Android at least allows for commodity hardware, which is far more free than iOS. And yes, RIP RIM.
Kirby Ferguson explains better than I ever have (or probably ever will) some of the dynamics behind why Android is winning…
Updated to add Aug 15, 2012: Even though Apple’s iOS lags in the market behind Android, Imperva reports that it is far more discussed by attackers (as reported in The Reg).
Updated to add Oct 25, 2015: Current phone Unix install base by version shows this blog wasn’t far off in its prediction of Android dominance.
A side consideration here is that China committed to a universal accessory standard for phones to tamper down landfill growth (e.g. charger upgrade because different connector). That would obviously sway them towards open because better for the environment. Now ask me why Tesla opened all their patents when China was looking for electric vehicle platforms (e.g. chargers) for the world’s largest fleets.
But like the Mac/laptop market, I would argue that Apple is concerned with profits over sales volume.
Hi Alex, Thanks for your comment. I agree that Apple is concerned with profits over quantity. I would add that they are concerned with profits over quality too.
I never had a phone die until I had an iPhone. Then I quickly destroyed two in six months just from moisture. Apple told me it wasn’t covered. So I fixed one myself and sold it for more than I paid for it. I took the profit and bought a Nokia. I haven’t had any problems with phone quality since.
Apple may generate profits but they are behind others in both quantity and quality. There are other brands like that. I don’t buy them if I can avoid it.