I thought for second that the date was a typo, but apparently the US military was pondering how to make a “love bomb” in 1994.

The most interesting thing about this story, however, is not how recent the absurd ideas were generated but the fact that they are so incredibly ethnocentric:

The plan for a so-called “love bomb” envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a “distasteful but completely non-lethal” blow to morale.

Scientists also reportedly considered a “sting me/attack me” chemical weapon to attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats towards enemy troops.

A substance to make the skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight was also pondered.

Another idea was to develop a chemical causing “severe and lasting halitosis”, so that enemy forces would be obvious even when they tried to blend in with civilians.

In a variation on that idea, researchers pondered a “Who? Me?” bomb, which would simulate flatulence in enemy ranks.

Indeed, a “Who? Me?” device had been under consideration since 1945, the government papers say.

However, researchers concluded that the premise for such a device was fatally flawed because “people in many areas of the world do not find faecal odour offensive, since they smell it on a regular basis”.

Uh huh. It is fun to debunk the plans one by one as they are mentioned and consider the source. In other words, the plans reveal the weaknesses of the US Army more than they give a sense of strength — the American military strategists are likely to be homophobic, dislike sunburn, worried about bad breath, afraid of wasps and rats, embarrassed by flatulence, etc..

None of the characteristics translate to a region that would be a target perhaps most ironically because the targets tend to be the sort of places that would have the fewest things in common with the attackers.