This Day in History: 1864 Sand Creek Massacre

The US National Park Service calls it…

8 Hours that changed the Great Plains forever

The Smithsonian calls it…

…one of the worst atrocities ever perpetrated on Native Americans… Sand Creek was the My Lai of its day, a war crime exposed by soldiers and condemned by the U.S. government. It fueled decades of war on the Great Plains. And yet, over time, the massacre receded from white memory, to the point where even locals were unaware of what had happened in their own backyard.

In brief, on November 29, 1864 at Sand Creek, Colorado a small peaceful non-threatening group of Southern Cheyenne and Arapahoe Native Americans (who believed they were under protection of US forces) were suddenly and brutally massacred at dawn by approximately 700 of “Colonel John Chivington’s Colorado volunteers”.

Chivington had fashioned himself as a “Christian” soldier. It was under his orders that nearly 150 Native Americans were tortured, murdered and badly mutilated. Three-fourths of his victims were innocent women and children butchered alive as they tried to escape. His men took human parts as “souvenirs” and tried to convince the American public such genocide was righteous.

WARNING: Explicit Depictions of the Massacre

In reality the treacherous “Colorado volunteers” viciously hunted down the Native Americans, often small children or elderly, and set fire to their villages despite white flags flying above.

Soldiers slashed open a pregnant woman’s belly, one soldier reported, “and took the Cheyenne child out and cut his throat.”

And while all this obviously criminal conduct of Chivington and his troops eventually was documented by whistleblowers and investigated, the Sand Creek Massacre Foundation points out no criminal charges were brought by the US against him!

Here is the kind of language found in the Joint Committee on the Conduct of War (Source: Hearing Before the Committee on Indian Affairs United States Senate One Hundred Tenth Congress First Session on Indian Health Care Improvement Act), which clearly documented depraved crimes of the US military:

Having full knowledge of their friendly character, having himself been instrumental to some extent in placing them in their position of fancied security, [Chivington] took advantage of their in-apprehension and defenceless [sic] condition to gratify the worst passions that ever cursed the heart of man,

Instead, an outstanding soldier in the US Army who had served under Chivington in Colorado and refused the genocidal orders and testified against Chivington was then assassinated by Chivington’s followers…

Silas Soule was later also murdered in Denver, but not before writing a graphic letter describing the atrocity to superior officers, gaining attention in Washington D.C.. Despite the ongoing Civil War, three federal investigations followed, in which Soule and other participants testified, resulting in condemnation of Chivington’s actions as an unjustifiable massacre. Cheyenne and Arapaho people honor Silas Soule today, and many say that were it not for his and others’ heroism, many Cheyenne and Arapaho descendants would not be here today.

Interesting to note that Soule has not been celebrated far more widely and regularly. He was already an American hero before he was placed under Chivington. Some speculate the US Army refusal to condemn Soule for disobedience was a passive criticism of Chivington.

As a former conductor on the Underground Railroad, and veteran of the fight in Kansas against domestic terrorists, Soule had helped lead the fight in Colorado to protect it from annexation by slaveholders (something the self-obsessed and thieving Chivington tried to claim credit for doing).

Soule stood against Chivington at a crucial moment. In today’s terms, he was a staunch defender of America against corrupt leadership:

The military, created to block slaveholder invasion, was being fraudulently converted (arguably Chivington had lost his remit before he gave orders) into a greedy for-profit extermination campaign waged illegally against Native Americans.

The complete and genocidal removal of the Arapaho and Cheyenne peoples from eastern Colorado by the very forces established to prevent removal of Americans from Colorado was peak hypocrisy and Soule documented it as such.

The National Park Service has published Captain Soule’s letter, condemning Chivington’s criminal crusade in chilling first-person witness details.

I saw two Indians hold one of another’s hands, chased until they were exhausted, when they kneeled down, and clasped each other around the neck and were both shot together.

Soule was the true American hero in every sense.

Captain Soule kneeling front row on the right. Sept 28, 1864. Source: AIM

His biography is a must read, albeit a tragedy among many successes in security (from jail-breaks to masterful tactics in battle) that were pivotal in American history.

He tried to stop and liberate John Brown, yet failed.

He tried to stop and convict Chivington, yet failed.

Jayhawker Ten, named for a fictitious bird, was a Kansas abolitionist militant group of Silas Soule

A low-budget movie recently was made about Soule, which really shows just how strangely unknown he is despite his amazing story.

Based on the horrific massacre at Sand Creek, Soul of Silas is a dramatic black and white Western Noir. The film chronicles the final brave acts of one of America’s unsung heroes from the Wild West: Captain Silas Soule. Soule was no stranger to the battle for justice.

The massacre makes for gruesome reading, and this history of the US might seem ancient. However, it also reminds me of what recently was exposed under the Reagan administration, given its documented 1982 brutality towards native Americans.

Reagan’s support led to a fundamentalist Christian taking control of Guatemala in a March 1982 coup d’etat. General Efrain Ríos Montt seized power and announced a policy of “rifles and beans” — either eat beans quietly in obedience to dictatorship or be killed by rifles. In response Reagan described him as “a man of great personal integrity”.

…more than 600 Indian villages in the Guatemalan highlands were eradicated or occupied by the military. The slogan “rifles and beans” meant that pacified communities would get “beans,” while all others would be the target of army “rifles.”

It makes sense to me that streets, schools, parks, etc be named for Soule. Why aren’t they?

…it is people like Soule and Cramer who truly deserve to be remembered through monuments and memorials, and can be a source for a different kind of historical understanding: one based not on abstract notions of justice and right, but upon the courage and integrity it takes to breathe life into those virtues.

Undoing the systemic erasure of American heroism (e.g. hiding Grant’s Tomb and erecting pro-slavery monuments) starts with promoting widespread awareness of great people like Soule who gave so much to their country and humanity.

Should Driverless Cars Navigate by Stars?

A backup to GPS, but really the precursor and consistently better system to GPS, is astral navigation.

In the USAF they affectionately referred to their NAS-14V2 system as a science-fiction icon.

Mounted behind the SR-71’s cockpit, this unit, affectionately known as “R2-D2,” computed navigational fixes using stars sighted through the lens in the top of the unit. These fixes were used to update the inertial navigation system and provided course guidance with an accuracy of at least 90 meters (300 feet).

I’ve driven with no running lights at night many times in rural and remote parts of the world.

I barely could see the driver’s hands rolling quickly back and forth on the steering wheel to keep us from driving off the cliff ledge to our left. He didn’t slow down after lights-out, and when I turned my head more towards him he said warmly l’appel du vide or something like that and smiled broadly at the barely visible road ahead.

Driving by astral navigation not only is feasible, it can reduce eye strain and increase safety.

When driverless engineers aim to take on the reigns of our horsepower, I hope they’re considering drivers operating lights out under the moon and stars… outside of Canada, of course.

Explosive Projectile-laden Drones to Navigate Small Spaces

I’ll never forget being briefed by a US Army General about the redesign of South Korea in ways that would force invading Chinese tanks into tight “killing zones”.

The idea is not to stop invading forces entirely, but to slow down enemy tanks and other vehicles and buy critical minutes to retreat and defend. A U.S. Army veteran deployed in the area decades ago noted it was “a bit disconcerting being stationed on the north side of these barriers.”

Take the humans out of those tanks and you’ve got explosive projectile-laden drones on land (VBIED), similar to the evolution of torpedoes flying in water and smart bombs/missiles flying through the air (like Tarzan).

South Korean problem spaces, and whether walls ever work, certainly sat on my mind when I was working at NASA back in the early 2000s.

French leadership failed to notice something was not normal (enemy troops moving through the Ardennes Forest and violating neutral countries). And that is why Maginot’s expensive wall continues to be almost universally remembered as a huge failure.

Researchers and colleagues at NASA ostensibly were trying to find a way for large mechanized robot swarms to navigate complex valleys on Mars, where Mars very neutrally/scientifically clearly represented a lot of other problem spaces.

In 2014 I actually gave several talks (including a private one to the future head of Facebook security) revealing a bit of the state of art at that time on research in drone swarm countermeasures.

Numerous positions can be injected into swarms, or forced upon them, to cause them to freeze.

That’s why I was proposing swarm countermeasures way back then, much to the chagrin of lawyers who ALWAYS told me that anyone trying to stop an attacking drone would be charged with property damage. Ah, lawyers.

Anyway, fast forward to today and here are two important updates that we all should have seen coming:

First, “Agility of bees could inspire drones that squeeze through tight spaces

Second, “Taliban Rigging Drones to Drop Bombs, Afghan Spy Chief Says

Why Americans Celebrate Thanksgiving

I’ve written about Thanksgiving history here many times (2005, 2006, 2008, 2010) and this year it feels like time to write again.

It is clear that the holiday was created by President Lincoln after Civil War to bring the pro-slavery rebels back to the table with their American neighbors and family.

Don’t know if I can do the topic any more justice, however, than a 2019 New Yorker article citing historians. So here is the TL;DR

Fretting over late-nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century immigration, American mythmakers discovered that the Pilgrims, and New England as a whole, were perfectly cast as national founders: white, Protestant, democratic, and blessed with an American character centered on family, work, individualism, freedom, and faith.

The new story aligned neatly with the defeat of American Indian resistance in the West and the rising tide of celebratory regret that the anthropologist Renato Rosaldo [B.A. Harvard College, 1963; Ph.D., Harvard University, 1971] once called “imperialist nostalgia.” Glorifying the endurance of white Pilgrim founders diverted attention from the brutality of Jim Crow and racial violence, and downplayed the foundational role of African slavery. The fable also allowed its audience to avert its eyes from the marginalization of Asian and Latinx labor populations, the racialization of Southern European and Eastern European immigrants, and the rise of eugenics. At Thanksgiving, white New England cheerfully shoved the problematic South and West off to the side, and claimed America for itself.

Shocking reversal. Lincoln brought the pro-slavery forces back to the table and they pivoted on his gesture to a false cover-story while still enacting divisive racial violence.

Just days before this article appeared, professor of history David Silverman also gave an hour-long lecture called “This Land Is Their Land” to the Massachusetts Historical Society, which highlights how the myth of Thanksgiving was formulated in the 1840s as a white supremacist narrative:

I’m going to provide you with everything you need to ruin your family’s holiday. […] War is the most basic feature of the Wampanoag-English relationship that the Thanksgiving myth studiously ignores. […] English promises of mercy [turned into] terms harsher than colonial officials had pledged… surrendering natives learned too late that colonial authorities would not spare any Indians… Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Rhode Island held public executions through the summer of 1676, including 50 hangings on Boston Common alone. There is no memorial to this event by the way. I think there should be. The English even exacted retribution on the dead. […] From the late 1600s through the mid 1800s white merchant creditors, courts and government appointed guardians colluded to force the Wampanoags and their children into indentured servitude to white farmers, householders and whaling markets with the terms often lasting for decades. Such court ordered servitude — one historian favored the term “judicial enslavement” — made it nearly impossible for the Wampanoags to sustain their normal social patterns, including the process of raising children. […] Throughout the colonial era, Thanksgiving had no association whatsoever with pilgrims and Indians. None. The link between the holiday and the history appears to date to 1841. […] The pilgrim saga took hold because it had use in the nation’s culture wars… IT WAS NO COINCIDENCE THAT THE PILGRIMS EMERGED AS NATIONAL FOUNDERS AMID POPULAR ANXIETY THAT THE UNITED STATES WAS BEING OVERRUN BY CATHOLIC AND THEN JEWISH AND ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN IMMIGRANTS. SUPPOSEDLY UNAPPRECIATIVE OF THE COUNTRY DEMOCRATIC PROTESTANT ORIGINS AND VALUES. ADDITIONALLY, TREATING THE PILGRIMS AS THE EPITOME OF COLONIAL AMERICA SERVED TO MINIMIZE THE COUNTRY’S RECORD OF RACIAL OPPRESSION PAST AND PRESENT. BETTER TO HIGHLIGHT THE PILGRIMS RELIGIOUS AND DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLES INSTEAD OF THE INDIAN WARS AND SLAVERY MORE TYPICAL OF COLONIES. INCLUDING THE NEW ENGLAND COLONIES. THROUGH SUCH MEANS, NORTH EASTERNERS COULD REDEFINE THE SO-CALLED BLACK AND INDIAN PROBLEMS AS SOUTHERN AND WESTERN EXCEPTIONS TO AN OTHERWISE INSPIRING NATIONAL HERITAGE. SO THEY SANITIZE THE HISTORY OF NEW ENGLAND AND THEN MAKE NEW ENGLAND THE MODEL FOR THE REST OF THE UNITED STATES.