Distracted Tesla Driver Hits Pedestrian. Autopilot Being Investigated

One of the giant false promises of Tesla is that it would improve safety by reducing distracted driver risk.

Investigators are now instead asking whether Tesla autopilot marketing is leading drivers to be more distracted than ever.

According to Sgt. Christopher Knox of the North Carolina State Highway Patrol, this was a case of distracted driving. WRAL News asked him if Yee’s Tesla was in autopilot mode, and if that could have played a role.

“We are looking at that,” he said. “That’s not definitive yet. We just believe the driver was distracted. Whether there was an autopilot feature in play or not, that’s something we hope to determine today and in the coming days.”

This tragedy is likely to be more confirmation that expert warnings have been accurate and Tesla has failed to heed them.

MIT researchers released a [2020] study that found that Tesla drivers are more distracted when they use the company’s semi-autonomous Autopilot…

The big fraud of Tesla seems to be getting a lot more attention lately.

A year ago, for instance, 17 percent of potential EV buyers told surveyors at YouGov that their first choice was a Tesla — more than any other brand. Now that number has dropped to 9 percent, outpaced by both Toyota and BMW. That sentiment seems to be turning up in actual sales, too.

Or as one very astute journalist puts it…

According to Consumer Reports, Teslas on Autopilot moved ‘like a drunken or distracted driver.’ …a 2019 independent review by the Quality Control Systems Corporation [stated] that collisions involving airbag deployment in fact likely increased following integration of Autopilot.

A decline in Tesla sales will surely save lives.

Locks? Tesla Owner Gets In Someone Else’s Tesla and Drives Away… Couldn’t Believe It Wasn’t His Car

Let’s be honest. The first problem with this story is that Tesla owners can’t tell apart the Teslas. If you bought a TZero in 2003, or a Tesla in 2013 or 2023 you’d be forgiven for thinking its designers have been the laziest workers in automotive history.

Fun fact: different cars are required to have different license plates. But let’s not go there since we’re talking about Tesla owners who obviously don’t care about details (I mean they wouldn’t have bought a Tesla, eh).

The second problem is that Tesla software allowed owner A to unlock and drive away in owner B’s vehicle. Unlock functionality. That means the app gives the appearance of being a security device based on unique identifiers, which obviously should NEVER have a “collision” for the WRONG car to be unlocked.

It begs basic competence of Tesla engineering and whether someone reading this is about to go to a major airport and single-handedly drive away with any Tesla in the parking lot like Randev.

Randev said he opened the door with his app, got in and even drove off. It wasn’t until he was driving that he realized something wasn’t quite right. “Apparently I found some glitch,” Randev said. When he went to pick up the car, there were two Teslas parked side by side, he explained. […] “I was able to get access, a hold of that person’s car but while I start driving it, I realized there was a crack on the windshield,” he said. So he called his wife to ask why and she did not know. He also noticed his charger was not where he usually had it. [After realizing the problem finally] “I was surprised how I was able to drive someone else’s car, by mistake, for an hour-and-a-half while his car was in his hand,” he added.

He then angrily told his wife to never change the license plate without telling him. Ooops, sorry. I said I wouldn’t go there.

But seriously, this reminds me of an old joke from the country. Alice and Bob can’t tell their sturdy steeds apart so they measure them. Alice discovers her black horse is ten hands tall while Bob says his white horse is eleven hands tall.

The Tesla story goes on to say that the company is so dysfunctional it’s unable to respond to Randev’s concerns about his safety.

Randev said he reached out to Tesla, with the video evidence, but he had some emails bounce back and no one has contacted him so far. Global News also reached out to Tesla multiple times but did not hear back. “The corporate email in North America, it says the mailbox is full,” Randev said.

Talk about lazy. What do Tesla workers even do while they’re not doing their job?

Perhaps Randev should install the Tesla corporate email app and see if it lets him in as administrator? If their mail server is anything like their other “futuristic” BS talk, it probably still has default passwords and zero effort at security.

Related, the type of things Tesla knew when they designed their app:

  • Bad physical entropy: “If you have a car made before 1995 you could be at risk of someone having a twin key to your car.”
  • Bad wireless entropy: “After issues with keyless entry in some vehicles a few years ago, the technology was upgraded [before 2016], making getting into someone else’s car with your remote, pretty hard to do.”
  • Car maker apathy: “Until more concern, publicity and complaints are brought out, this will not be of significant concern for auto manufacturers and they won’t spend the money needed to correct this.”

Tesla is a lazy fraud. Their brand is basically garbage engineering for careless people in a rush who don’t check details.

The Microsoft Ethics Team Was Fired After They Criticized OpenAI

Nothing to see here. Move along.

The move leaves Microsoft without a dedicated team to ensure its AI principles are closely tied to product design at a time when the company is leading the charge to make AI tools available to the mainstream, current and former employees said. …the team has been working to identify risks posed by Microsoft’s adoption of OpenAI’s technology throughout its suite of products. […] The elimination of the ethics and society team came just as the group’s remaining employees had trained their focus on arguably their biggest challenge yet: anticipating what would happen when Microsoft released tools powered by OpenAI to a global audience.

What would happen? Apparently Microsoft would kill the messengers like a Facebook.

German Inability to Accept Guilt and Two World Wars

Two recent works explore a dangerous theme in German history about dealing with guilt.

First, the first World War.

Most Germans refused to accept the blame for starting the war, seeing Germany as having reacted defensively to French and Russian “encirclement” and believed the Kaiser’s deception that he declared war in response to Russian mobilisation. This is what made the famous “war guilt” clause at Versailles, a statement of plain fact, such a bitter a pill to swallow. It was from this starting premise, established in 1914, that many of the other pathological ideas that spread in 1920s and 1930s Germany logically followed.

Second, the second World War.

Schwarz discovered that in 1938, her grandfather, a member of the Nazi Party, exploited anti-Semitic policies and the persecution of Jews to underpay for a business owned by a Jewish family. In later letters to the family’s only survivor, her grandfather refused to pay reparations. “You can see that he’s in total denial of his responsibility as a Mitläufer under the Third Reich,” said Schwarz. “And most of German society, after the war, was in total denial of their responsibility to the point that they considered themselves as victims.”