Chilling details are emerging from a case in Minnesota, where a Tesla apparently killed a woman walking her dogs.

Apart from spelling out the evidence the BCA has in hand so far, the affidavit also disclosed that two women told investigators they saw Donovan’s body on the hood of a smaller SUV heading north on the highway, with her head near the windshield.

Her body was lodged onto the hood until she fell off and was run over and left behind.

The story indicates the Tesla owner slept or otherwise ignored his road robot while it was killing someone.

State investigators have seized an SUV and questioned the owner of the vehicle they suspect was involved in a hit-and-run crash that killed a longtime family doctor as she walked her dogs near Lake Mille Lacs last fall.

The seizure of the gray 2022 Tesla X is among several pieces of evidence detailed in a court document filed Tuesday afternoon that point to an Edina man as the person who hit 56-year-old Cathy Ann Donovan around sunset on Nov. 13 along northbound Hwy. 169 near the southern shore of Lake Mille Lacs.

The man claiming to have no knowledge of any crash, and never stopping despite a pedestrian being flung onto his windshield and then run over, to me says negligent homicide by Autopilot.

Update March 13: Police say they don’t think it was that Tesla.

The exit interview for the head of the NHTSA highlights their new road robot regulation program idea launched last June.

We’re also considering a new program called AV STEP. That would combine the opportunity for manufacturers to deploy automated vehicles with a process that would allow NHTSA significant access to information about redundancy and safety systems,

This program also has an Automated Vehicle Transparency and Engagement for Safe Testing Initiative (AV TEST) component described in an ARTS23 keynote speech.

We’re now looking to use Section 30114 to establish a new program, which we’re calling AV STEP, which I’m really excited to describe for you. Data truly is fundamental to our work, and we are continuously looking for new ways to gather ADS data to inform future oversight and rulemaking. One way we do this is through our import program established under Section 30114.

It started with a short list.

The participating companies are Beep, Cruise, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, Local Motors, Navya, Nuro, Toyota, Uber, and Waymo. The States are California, Florida, Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Utah.

The White House occupant in 2016, corrupted by Tesla, not only tried to silence the NHTSA but also declare robot safety a state concern instead of being under federal jurisdiction.

This led to over 30 states allowing known unsafe robots on roads, and predictable unnecessary deaths as a result, making US roads so unsafe it has been “like living through a war“.

AV STEP seems intended to return the country to some semblance of safety science, away from the corruption and fraud spread by Tesla. It’s a “step” in the right direction, although most car brands aren’t yet developing mechanical legs.

Details on the ongoing ChatGPT security disaster have been posted by Dan Goodin, one of my favorite and most trusted tech reporters.

“I went to make a query (in this case, help coming up with clever names for colors in a palette) and when I returned to access moments later, I noticed the additional conversations,” Whiteside wrote in an email. “They weren’t there when I used ChatGPT just last night (I’m a pretty heavy user). No queries were made—they just appeared in my history, and most certainly aren’t from me (and I don’t think they’re from the same user either).”

As I presented at last year’s RSA conference in SF, using ChatGPT brings with it a critical integrity vulnerability. If your “history” is artificially generated by the software company, how would you prove it wasn’t/isn’t yours?

In related news, Italy says ChatGPT violates privacy regulations.

Reading the full report I found an investigation table insightful.

The crux of the complaints relate to GM not transmitting the “dragging” data, which establishes why and how the robot likely hurt this pedestrian after impact far worse than a human driver would have.

Further along in the report it’s made plain how Cruise was not disclosing that their robot did the wrong thing or that it significantly increased harms to the pedestrian.

Communications members also continued to give reporters the following bullet point on background: “[t]he AV came to a complete stop immediately after impacting the struck pedestrian, even though by this time Cruise, including senior members of its communications team, knew that the AV moved forward immediately after striking the pedestrian. Cruise communications team members gave this statement to media reporters after the 6:45 a.m. SLT meeting, some of whom published it, well into the afternoon of October 3, including Forbes, CNBC, ABC News Digital, Engadget, Jalopnik, and
The Register.

That’s not good. But the worst part is when Cruise staff defined harming pedestrians in an urban environment as an “edge” case they aren’t concerned about.

Vogt reportedly characterized the October 2 Accident as an extremely rare event, which he labeled as an “edge case”.

Cold. Cruel. Immoral.

This is a good reminder that American “death corridors” in cities were no accident. And I’ve been saying robots on roads will kill a lot of pedestrians since 2016, the exact opposite of edge.