Tesla Cybertruck Rated Too Fragile to Tow: “Ability of a Pop Can”

A simple test confirmed what most people already estimated for an “efficient” cast aluminum frame of the Cybertruck. It’s very weak and only gets weaker with each use.

“The Cybertruck is not a rigid stainless steel exoskeleton supertruck, like it was advertised. It is a soft, supple, porous, Mohs 3 level cast aluminum (truck) with the towing ability of a pop can.” The Cybertruck’s rear subframe [advertised as 11,000 pounds capacity] totally shattered with about 10,000 pounds of force on the hitch. […] “A cast aluminum frame with just 3/16ths wall thickness is just a slap in the face to anyone who bought one of these Cybertrucks,” says Nelson.

Pop can. Shattered. Slap in the face.

Not what a truck “rated” for towing is supposed to mean, certainly not. You’d be safer towing with a Toyota Prius.

The Prius power split device transmission delivers precise torque control without slipping, while its steel-reinforced frame provides structural integrity under load. Toyota’s engineering prioritizes proven materials science and humble honest hard work over flashy aesthetics and puffery. Real-world performance exceeds expectations, which is a notable difference between the brands.

Tesla Cybertruck Sinks in Water Like a Rock

Well, well, that settles that. Elon Musk said it could float, but the Cybertruck sank even faster than his stock price.

Source: edhat

The owner’s attempt to launch a jet ski led to this unfortunate incident, despite Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s previous statements suggesting that the CyberTruck could function as a boat for short periods. Musk has made claims in the past regarding the buoyancy and boat-like capabilities of Tesla vehicles, stirring skepticism. This incident serves as a cautionary tale to vehicle owners [who listen to Elon Musk].

Tesla Loses More Value Faster Than Any Car Brand in History

Forbes has the big money quote:

“We struggle to think of anything analogous in the history of the automotive industry, in which a brand has lost so much value so quickly,” wrote the JPMorgan analysts. […] Shares of Tesla are still down 38% year-to-date, the second-worst loss of any company listed on the S&P 500…

Quite a feat for Elon Musk, given that he is…

…a man who may well be the most prolific liar in the history of American business…

Czech Gov Claims “Let’s Encrypt” Isn’t Good Enough

See if you can follow the logic, as reported by Lupa.cz.

The reasons for preferring the paid option over the free certificate are essentially two. Let’s Encrypt issues DV certificates with validity limited to only three months. Before the original expires, it’s necessary to deploy a new certificate, which means having a functional ACME client with automation elements set up so that, if possible, the system takes care of this obligation in time by itself. In contrast, commercial certificates are usually issued for at least one year. The IT department thus only needs to remember that once a year, the certificate needs to be replaced.

“In some environments, the implementation of automation through available ACME clients for Let’s Encrypt may not yet be fine-tuned for sufficient reliability, or may not be available at all,” adds the head of the Czech certification authority Alpiro, Antonín Kozan. And he adds a second reason why domain verification is often insufficient for clients.

“Many of our customers realize that in connection with SSL certificates, not only the encryption of communication itself is important, but also the added value in the form of higher credibility with an SSL certificate issued against rigorous verification of the organization. This is crucial for a wide range of organizations from financial or state institutions, established companies, online stores, and other entities that place high emphasis on the higher credibility of SSL certificates with OV or EV,” he concludes.

Sorry, that doesn’t check out for me. Haha, get it? Czech out? It’s the little bits of humor in these troubled times… anyway, ahem, seriously this doesn’t check out. If there’s one place in the world I expect people to use simple, reliable systems for tracking things, it’s Prague. Let me explain why.

First, for a 90 day rotation question the easy technology answer is a proxy or reverse proxy with automated renewal handling. Think of it like a piece of paper you put on your table that keeps track of things so you don’t have to. There are many tools that do this, so I’m hopefully not surprising anyone:

  • Traefik
  • Caddy
  • Nginx Proxy Manager
  • Certbot with cron jobs

All of these deal with Let’s Encrypt renewals even in legacy systems that can’t handle ACME. The proxy safely terminates traffic and safely front-ends systems that remain unaware of certificate management.

Second, with regard to a “need for higher trust” in OV/EV certificates, I’m not sure where they’re getting that from:

  1. Nobody notices or understands any difference in DV, OV, and EV certificates anymore. Is this like a local fan group or special circumstance? Like we only drink beer made from our local creek kind of thing?
  2. Modern browsers removed visual indicators for EV certificates so it’s not like anyone is expected to understand the difference anymore.
  3. The “big” traffic encryption sites like Google and Amazon run DV certificates, and as horrible as they are ethically, they do care about the actual strength of security.

This might all just be a case of doing things the “local” way. Like when I sit in a Prague cellar drinking twelve beers and … remember when I mentioned a piece of paper? The Czechs are known for their “čárky” marks, where the easy thing is the right thing to do apparently.

Tally marks track the beers you’ve had
Measure Čárky Let’s Encrypt
Purpose Track beer consumption Deliver website certificates
Philosophy Simple, transparent, accessible Simple, transparent, accessible
Status Traditional Standard
Alternative Paid vendor (disruptive) Paid vendor (unusual)
Cost None None
Complexity Minimal (pencil, paper) Minimal (automated scripts)
Renewal Every beer (server) Every 90 days (automated)
Resistance From POS vendors Certificate vendors
Effectiveness High value low cost High value low cost

So maybe there’s some kind of financial angle to certification authorities pushing paid products into lined pockets, rather than technical or security concerns? Who really loses what? Who stands opposed to using the standard high value low cost solution?

Properly automated DV certificates from Let’s Encrypt provide the same level of encryption security without the manual renewal overhead and cost. There’s more to this story, that’s all I’m saying. Czech it out.