Tesla Kills Three Kids in Autopilot Safety Test (Because no LiDAR)

Simulated kids, real tragedy.

I won’t bore you up front with the fact that Tesla since 2016 has repeatedly been proven by engineers to be a dangerous fraud.

Truth can be boring, and safety design failures can be especially boring.

Take for example this dangerous design flaw in a Tesla cast aluminum frame explained by basic physics. See what I mean? No of course you don’t because… ZZZZZZ you fell asleep by the time I said “explained”. I get it, I do. As a security guy with decades of board-room experience, I have seen it many times before. I’ve literally watched a CEO in a zillion dollar NYC skyscraper office fall asleep when he is being presented with evidence of immediate danger to his customers. Wake up America.

Huh? What? Why should he care? Get woke for what?

Spoiler alert. Simple tests of Tesla dangerous design decisions repeatedly have proven them to be a known deadly threat to public safety… for a very long time. This post is about a cool new kid on the block.

March 2025 a Tesla autopilot still runs over children like it’s 2016. Over 50 people have so far been killed by Tesla autopilot design flaws.

Well, a dead new kid.

A mannequin of a kid run over by a Crunchlabs funded Tesla (in partnership with a Lidar company)… like a drunken Russian sea captain crashing broadside into an anchored oil tanker. Side burn, literally.

A catastrophic demonstration of information warfare: The Solong container ship’s unnatural trajectory into a U.S. military oil tanker in March 2025 bears all the hallmarks of exploitation in known navigation system vulnerabilities.

So let’s consider that anyone with an ounce of integrity has known for decades why and how LiDAR is considered by experts to be a mandatory autopilot safety requirement. Navigation safety is very well known and extensively studied, despite Tesla pretending like it’s all up in the air. Cameras are very poor at object recognition due to visibility issues and, just to make this point abundantly clear, Tesla implemented low-quality cheap webcams. It’s such an intentionally bad design decision as to appear some kind of sick, cruel joke on all those who have died as a result of trusting Tesla with their lives.

Everyone knew that Elon Musk removing LiDAR was a short sighted (no pun intended) “cost cutting” measure that would definitely kill people, let alone the subsequent “cost cutting” by slapping in flawed AI with cheap and weak cameras…. And yet, how many saw it as foreshadowing for Elon Musk in 2025 rapidly firing American government workers and shutting down critical agencies as “unnecessary” in his latest unhinged “cost cutting” fallacy? Remember when he argued “the best part is no part” as if to warn everyone he believed the best life would be no life at all? As if to admit everyone was going to die?

Making Americans Dead Again.

Just as dozens of people unnecessarily have been killed by Tesla autopilot by having its LiDAR stupidly cut out (leading to a Tesla death rate higher than domestic terrorism), Elon Musk is on track (no pun intended) to get even more people killed with his extremist nihilist “the best is nothing” attack on American federal government services.

Same guy. Same deadly moves. Same horrible, tragic outcome expected: unnecessarily dead children.

Killing children is by design, I’m afraid. ‘Pro-natalists’ like Musk claim they aren’t racist, but their pressure to have children is solely focused on white women, while they back policies that literally kill non-white children. He’s a eugenicist.

Notably, children in the road statistically tend to be poorer, which in America’s historic caste system means non-white children are far more in danger from Tesla than white.

March 2025 a Tesla autopilot crashes through a wall and runs over a mannequin, totally blind to objects and humans in the road. Arguably the brand only has gotten worse as it intentionally removes critical safety equipment, slashing costs despite known risks to life and property.

I say all that because this flashy new video shouldn’t be making news, given it rehashes such a long-known fact. Instead it’s already at 5M views and rocketing higher and higher. The creator pumps his volume to 11 on being “first” and doing something novel. He falsely implies that we didn’t already have copious tests showing Elon Musk knowingly removed safety and intentionally caused deaths. That’s a dangerous tactic, undermining the community to benefit the content creator (subscribe, subscribe, money, money, buy this new LiDAR device).

Everyone knows the Dawn Project right? They suck at marketing, no doubt.

The death total is 52 now… it rises rapidly.

Yet Dawn Project also has top notch engineers. They staff the BEST quality engineers and have been doing these Tesla mannequin demonstrations for years. Nobody should make a new video doing what the Dawn Project have been doing, nobody should fail to mention such very well known prior art… oh, wait, unless you are a fan of Walt Disney.

Ahhh, Disney. That a**hole. This new video guy is like, really into liking Disney.

Disney NEVER was about credit. Disney is the quintessential idea theft model used in attention seeking for profit. Random example? Who can forget Disney saw a woman in LA had made a successful family business after she invented tortilla chips. Doritos were then launched as a brand with high production value to bascially sell across the street from her, taking her business away in direct competition without credit due. Everyone knows about Doritos, nobody remembers the woman inventor they were meant to erase from history.

El Zarape 1950s Tortilla Factory in Los Angeles, before its President Rebecca Webb Carranza was erased from history by splashy Disney productions. Click to enlarge.

What was her name? She literally invented tortilla chips and like nobody remembers her?

That’s Disney.

Many, many prior engineers have tested and proven what is being repeated in this new high production level video. I believe my public presentations on hacking LiDAR in automotive systems (*cough* Tesla *cough*) even go way back over a decade to 2014. This unfortunately had the opposite effect intended, as high-integrity LiDAR was perceived to be expensive compared with dreams of cheap fantasy-3D-optics. By 2015 the BlackHat conference sprung even more proofs (PDF) of what I had been presenting the year before.

2015 BlackHat presentation from a test lab with results on the driverless attacks I had presented the prior year

Beyond that I have met with real LiDAR experts over the last decade as they spilled ink criticizing the safety flaws of Tesla. These are legit aerospace engineers who laid it out for all of us to see. And, like the rest of us, they got zero attention. I bet you wouldn’t even know their names. My talks were based on such priors and peers, as well as current research, and always used citations.

Very unlike Disney.

Slide from my 2014 presentation on ethics and Big Data Security as it related to driverless cars. Mannequins back then proved them blind. We knew. They knew. And yet people still bought into a blood-stained Tesla brand, killing dozens if not hundreds since then.

What’s being shown in this video is thus VERY OLD AND WELL KNOWN as a Tesla design flaw forced by Elon Musk. That can’t be said enough, and should be said in context of all the experts in agreement over time because the timeline and persistence of experts matters.

Ok, ok. I know what you’re thinking. Production matters. Getting attention matters. Ok, fine, I can’t say I don’t appreciate a novel new presentation style. I do appreciate someone having sizzle and sass of a heavily-funded influencer meme. The “gosh golly” squeaky narrator voice really spins his way into our heads like a Mickey Mouse clubhouse song. I get it. The Snow White or Mermaid story under a Disney-style big production hammer can fool people into thinking everything is new, as if kids had not been told that same story since forever before. Is this new video any different? We can appreciate his polish, surely, without also losing sight of the real origin thread, right? Over a decade of this same message, does the new video break through?

I just wonder why his high budget anti-Tesla production didn’t end with the crucial statement THREE KIDS DIED in the simulated safety tests. Too honest? Too real? The story here AGAIN is that Tesla knowingly sold straw huts to pigs while falsely claiming to be selling them space age materials that prevent wolf visits… predictably resulting in three poor little pigs being eaten by the wolf.

Let’s face it, this new “Tesla can’t see” video ups the game with some production whiz (as in propaganda wizards, like military intelligence agencies). The star of the show goes to Disneyland a lot, that’s clear, so we can understand his aspirational “wow kids” style (his marketing foo… formerly known as propaganda).

The polish is very different than the work I usually see from focused safety engineers, who correctly regard most forms of attention seeking as integrity risk or even loss/corruption. The buried lede is that a LiDAR company did the work with him, promoting safety advantages of LiDAR. It’s practically a commercial, an ad itself. And then it ends with a icky plea for subscribers.

Watch it if you want, but it simply tells you what you already should have known: Huff-a-puff, blow the camera hut down… all the Elon Musk “efficiency” really just means cheats and short-cuts that kill people in the way that corruption always does.

It’s a long video so the TL;DR is a straw hut (camera) isn’t a brick house (LiDAR) when the wolf blows in.

Elon Musk’s life of white supremacist privileges, which led to his alleged habit of intentional shortcuts of “efficiency” to avoid real engineering work, means that twenty time three little pigs are dead.

For real, over 50 people have been killed by Tesla autopilot: Tesladeaths.com Or perhaps to the real point, where has this new video guy been for the last ten years?

Musk Spins Lie About Trump’s Past Popularity

Elon Musk is spreading the lies thick, given his latest Tweet to pump Trump.

Look at what they did to President @realDonaldTrump. He was loved by democrats until he ran for president. Now they call him Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, etc and try to kill him.

5:40PM March 14, 2025

Ok, that’s just so obviously false as to be dangerous proof Musk has lost touch with reality.

Donald Trump was very widely disliked by many Americans, especially in Democratic and progressive circles, long before his presidential campaign.

Trump was heavily involved in promoting the “birther” conspiracy theory well before he ran for president. He became one of the most prominent voices pushing this false narrative around 2011, about four years before he announced his presidential campaign in June 2015.

In early 2011, Trump began appearing on television programs like Fox News, where he repeatedly questioned President Obama’s birthplace and citizenship despite abundant evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii. Trump claimed to have sent investigators to Hawaii and suggested they had found concerning information (though he never provided any evidence of this).

This racist conspiracy theory was a significant part of why many people, especially Democrats and progressives, strongly disliked Trump years before he entered the presidential race. The birther movement was widely viewed as an attempt to delegitimize America’s first Black president by casting him as a foreigner and was condemned as racist by many political commentators.

Trump only publicly acknowledged that Obama was born in the United States in September 2016, during his presidential campaign because he knew how disliked he was, and even then he falsely claimed that Hillary Clinton had started the rumor.

His public image in New York City, where he was most visible, and therefore most detested, was particularly negative among long term residents who had to hear his disgusting racism for decades and watch all his ideas fail (steak, planes, vodka, casinos…).

The idea that this guy on the run from everyone trying to collect his debts suddenly became controversial only after running for president ignores his long disgraced history.

Are we done here yet?

I’ll continue. Beyond the birther fraud and being deeply unpopular anywhere he was really known, there were many other reasons he faced strong criticism:

  • His business reputation included allegations of fraud at Trump University
  • His environmental record and battles with local communities over development projects
  • His tabloid persona and controversial statements about women
  • His personal attacks against critics and celebrities
  • His tendency toward exaggeration and self-promotion that many found off-putting

He was a deeply polarizing figure, hated by Democrats, well before entering politics at the national level.

The historical record clearly shows that Trump wasn’t suddenly disliked only after announcing his presidential run, because he cultivated significant friction through his many immoral actions and statements for many years prior.

Elon Musk suggesting that Democrats only began criticizing him after he ran for president is false, revisionist and evidence of what’s really wrong with the both of them.

Musk also mischaracterizes the normal political process as if he doesn’t understand that candidates face heightened scrutiny because… duh, inviting attention is what a campaign is and does. Trump’s pre-existing controversies naturally received more attention once he sought the presidency, as none of it needed to be newly invented.

Let me put it another way. The only voters, Democrat or Republican, who really liked Trump before or after he ran for president, are people who aligned with his overt racism. It was unmistakable ever since the 1970s, so there’s nothing new about who really likes or hates him. And in that sense, when some particular people call him Hitler, they probably mean it as a compliment.

NJ Tesla Crashes Head-on Into Police Car In Pusuit

If the police car was displaying full lights and sirens, yet the Tesla drove into it, you know it’s an Autopilot crash.

The officer was pursuing the violator outside of the CNBC building on Route 9W (Sylvan Avenue) in Englewood Cliffs, when a Tesla turned in front of his vehicle, striking him head-on at approximately 3:15 Thursday, March 13, sources with direct knowledge of the incident said.

Tesla Stop Sale on Cybertruck Due to Trim Safety Failure

Stop Sales are legally required to be publicly reported to NHTSA, so this obviously can’t be called a Stop Sale, because that would mean Tesla would have to do something legal.

Right, so that being said, the Stop Sale that can’t be called a Stop Sale, is stopping sales of the Cybertruck right now.

Tesla Cybertruck deliveries are on hold as trims are flying off…. We previously reported on Tesla recalling 11,000 Cybertrucks due to some trims detaching while driving. That recall was in June of last year, but is looks like the problem might be coming back.

The weakly glued body panels are flying apart left and right, causing a safety hazard even faster than the frame can crack and break, faster than the wheels fall off. What a marvel of engineering genius!

Mind the gap.

The most amazing part of this whole story is that anyone is still trying to pay money for a Cybertruck.

Can’t call it a Stop Sale if there are no sales to stop.