Tesla Phantom Breaking: Car Falls Apart After Sudden Acceleration Crash Into Empty Ferry Terminal

Yes, Tesla is breaking bad, like it’s 2021 again.

The cars keep destroying themselves, leaving everyone scratching their heads.

“It looks like it was trying to board a ferry and suddenly accelerated into the gate, basically destroying the Tesla,” said McLean. “We don’t know what caused it to happen,” said McLean, adding police are initially looking at either a mechanical issue, or a matter concerning the driver, which may have caused the sudden acceleration.

There’s a twist to the story.

There was no vessel in the berth at the time of the incident. The vehicle was not attempting to board a ferry.” […] Typically, in order for a vehicle to get to the ferry ramps it would have to have been authorized to board a ferry, so it remains unclear if the vehicle was intending to board at another ramp but ended up accelerating toward one that had no ferry.

It brings to mind the crash video from China that shows brake lights illuminated, while Tesla insisted the brakes were never used.

Tesla also claims that the driver never pressed the brakes. Pictures from public cameras show that this is not true: the brake lights are clearly on at least one occasion without any obstacles ahead…

It’s a very old problem and Tesla routinely accuses its customers of stepping on the “wrong” pedal continuously and at 100%, such as a recent case where a family drove into a pool.

The big problem with Tesla analysis, of course, is that they may simply have no integrity (especially when compared with other brands). The logs are fallible. So when you read a statement like this one, ask yourself whether the log may record what the car thought and NOT what the driver actually instructed.

Data shows that the vehicle was traveling at 6 mph when the accelerator pedal was abruptly increased to 100%. Consistent with the driver’s actions, the vehicle applied torque and accelerated as instructed.

That phrase “consistent with the driver’s actions” seems wrong. Why would someone write it that way? It gives the impression that they started with that assumption and then just looked for some sloppy way to prove it.

What if the pedal system increased to 100% in contradiction to the driver actions.

I’m not speaking hypothetically but from experience. I’ve been able to inject commands using CAN-bus into cars giving them bogus commands, even exploiting race conditions. Sending 100% accelerator signals and having it hit the logs begs whether any real proof exists of a connection to physical pedal.

You’ve heard of phantom braking. Why not phantom breaking… from unintended acceleration?

NHTSA opened a formal investigation in February 2022 regarding phantom braking incidents. The investigation includes 2021-2022 Tesla Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, and by May 2022, the government knew of more than 750 unintended sudden braking incidents.

Allegedly this is why some Tesla owners think they need a camera on the floor recording their foot positions.

A better solution would be the logs going to the owner. And then the owner regularly testing the logs and validating integrity controls.

With the brake pedal lights in the video contradicting Tesla’s overconfident statement that brakes weren’t applied (according to their logs) you see the problem. With the logs being sent always to the owner’s personal data storage and with regular integrity tests, you’d definitely see the problem.

Boner in Wyoming Tries to Stick It to California With EV Ban

I wish I was making this up. A man named Boner, who obviously has a hard time understanding EV technology, thinks of himself as a political genius.

Unlike California’s ban on gas-powered cars, the resolution’s co-sponsor, Sen. Brian Boner, R-Douglas, said the Wyoming resolution would be meaningful in making a statement if passed, but it would be entirely symbolic. “One might even say tongue-in-cheek, but obviously it’s a very serious issue that deserves some public discussion,” Boner said. 

Boner says his resolution is trying to be tongue-in-cheek when he screws his own state.

His basic strategy? Write dumb resolutions in Wyoming opposing whatever California does, so people can say he “promoted discussion”.

Far more intelligent voices in Wyoming spit out the resolution as harmful.

…Allen referenced Cadillac, which plans to produce only electric vehicles between 2025 and 2030. For dealers to keep selling the brand, they would need to make a minimum investment of $250,000 in infrastructure for charging stations and stronger lifts, as EVs are heavier than conventional vehicles. She said she spoke to one dealership in Wyoming that is spending more than $500,000 to meet the manufacturer’s requirements. Allen said that even though SJ 4 was just a resolution meant as a statement, even making that statement would negatively impact dealerships in Wyoming. Besides asking them to violate agreements with manufacturers, it encourages people not to buy EVs from them. “Casual statements can cause real harm,” Allen warned. 

Investment in infrastructure. The resolution was trying to symbolically ban investments in Wyoming infrastructure.

It doesn’t get much dumber.

[Senator Cooper] referenced the oath of office he took when he was sworn in as a member of the Wyoming Legislature to protect the state of against all enemies — foreign and domestic. Phasing out gasoline-powered vehicles, he said, is a direct attack on Wyoming.

Oops. I was wrong. Cooper is much worse than Boner.

Cooper, who only just became an elected official, wants to call investment in Wyoming infrastructure by American car companies the same thing as a direct enemy attack?

Boner may be silly and easy to poke, but Cooper appears to be in a stupor.

Now I’m curious just how much foreign versus domestic influence is behind Cooper’s “Self Employed Oil and Gas Consultant” business, besides frequently getting tax delinquency notices. Even if he’s just a shill for domestic oil and gas, a fox who goes into a hen house to scream that eggs are the enemy… is a strange sight indeed.

Tesla Engineer Testimony Exposes “Driverless” As Planned Deception

Here’s the confession:

The intent of the video was not to accurately portray what was available for customers …

What video? This video:

The video, which remains archived on Tesla’s website, was released in October 2016 and promoted on Twitter by Chief Executive Elon Musk as evidence that “Tesla drives itself.” […] When Tesla released the video, Musk tweeted, “Tesla drives itself (no human input at all) thru urban streets to highway to streets, then finds a parking spot.”

If the intent was not to accurately portray what was available then why was the CEO on Twitter promoting the video as evidence of what was available?

What parking spot? This parking spot:

Drivers intervened to take control in test runs [the engineer testified in court]. When trying to show the Model X could park itself with no driver, a test car crashed into a fence in Tesla’s parking lot, he said.

Tesla is just fraud.

Without fraud there would be no Tesla.

More to the point of this story, taken from a wrongful death lawsuit, dozens of people still would be alive today if they hadn’t become victims of Tesla fraud.

Here’s the real kicker to this story. The lawsuit shows that a highly skilled Apple engineer, who repeatedly noticed a defect in Tesla software, couldn’t prevent his own death from it.

The new documents offer clear confirmation of this claim. On at least two prior occasions, Huang’s Model X tried to steer into the concrete barrier at exactly the same spot along highway 101. Each time, Huang noticed the mistake and grabbed the wheel, steering it back into the correct lane.

You only have to lose the fight with defective autopilot software once and you’re dead (e.g. Tesla’s pole position).

That’s actually very similar to the lesson from the Boeing 737 MAX disaster, particularly the Ethiopian crash, where pilots fought with a design defect repeatedly before they tragically lost.

Source: The Seattle Times

Now everyone should be asking why Tesla hasn’t been “grounded” — banned from operating on public roads.

2023 Railroader of the Year Highlights Montana Train Rebirth

The automobile industry very cruelly aborted train services in Montana.

The coming of the transcontinental railroads to Montana Territory in the 1880s is the single most transformational economic development in the entire history of Montana.

Such a disasterous anti-development decision (Montana ran innovative electric and even “snow powered” engines) stands to be reversed, given some very subtle signs of rail rebirth.

First, buried in a 2023 award interview, Katie Farmer (CEO of BNSF) calls out a Montana project as a top priority.

One of our challenges is communicating that relevancy and the importance of the rail industry to young people, because it’s not natural, per se, for people to think about it. We’re kind of unsung heroes. […] Also, while it’s not yet complete and yet to be approved by the Surface Transportation Board, bringing back Montana Rail Link into the BNSF network is something that all of us at BNSF will be proud of.

Second, some local editorials suggest rising support for a major passenger rail corridor.

…this state was built on railways. Beginning in 1880 when the tracks first linked us to the rest of the nation… For 100 years the major population centers of Montana were connected by passenger trains until service was cut in 1979. I can imagine the excitement of watching the “North Coast Hiawatha” pull into the local station. Before the cancellation of passenger service, Missoula, Butte, Bozeman and Billings had a train running through them three times per week. […] Of any route which wandered through Montana, why would we cut the one which passed through four of our biggest towns? Amtrak, with the help of growing ridership and a refortified budget, seems to have halted its retreat and is looking to regain lost ground.

All that being said, here’s the real buried lede: cars have proven to be death traps killing Montana.

The highways of Montana are among the deadliest in the United States; with the presence of a passenger rail route offering an alternative to highway travel, many anxious families seeing their children and loved ones off wouldn’t have to worry nearly as much about bad weather conditions, deer running onto the road, or reckless drivers.

Rail is showing other countries developing and moving ahead of America. China is just one example where 40 hour trips have been reduced to 8 hours by modern rail, high-throughput low-risk movement transforming their economy.

“I could feel the change in temperature from — 10 C in Beijing to more than 20 C in Guangzhou. I understood how the speed cut the journey time and distance, and how the high-speed railway brought people closer.” In the decade since it opened, the world’s longest high-speed railway line, running 2,298 kilometers, has recorded 1.69 billion passenger trips, according to China State Railway Group, the national railway operator.

Let me put it this way. One and a half billion trips at 350km/hr (217mph) for a decade where people could use the time to sleep, eat, work… with how many fatalities?

…there have been no serious incidents on the network since 2011.

The freedom of 350km/hr in a safe, inexpensive and convenient format.

Cars will never, ever achieve that level of performance or safety innovation.

Two kids among six dead in tragic 21-car Montana dust storm pileup.

Weather. Cars can’t handle it. Driverless cars? Forgetaboutit.

What’s the cost of the train? The better question is what’s the cost of not having a train. Montana has suffered extensively.

‘Fatality markers’ remind Montana drivers of tragic consequences. There are more than 2,500 of these white markers across the state. Wherever you go in the state of Montana, you can see little white markers along the road, shaped like a cross. Each marker stands where someone lost their life.

Montana has become a giant graveyard.

So many dead.

After dumping a huge amount of money into gasoline and cars, all if it gone in an instant — thousands of gravestones. So unnecessary.

It would be interesting if Montana reversed its steep taxation and abortion system known as automobiles, and instead developed freedom of movement into rail leadership in safety and efficiency. Someday it would mean a mesh design, and a corridor is a significant start.

If you’ve ever studied West Berlin’s Cold War rail routes interlocking with airstrips, and its “honor” ticket system, you know what real freedom of movement is all about.

There’s no question a modern passenger train with a proper path and timetable would make Montana the most attractive state for economic growth among it’s neighbors. With heavyweight BNSF throwing its giant hat in the ring, it even could become a global leader in transit innovation.