Grab Them by the Glaciers: Trump’s Greenland Fantasy Reveals Colonial Pattern from Florida to the Arctic

When Donald Trump floated his plan to acquire Greenland, many dismissed it as another bizarre outburst from a president who treats geopolitics like a reality TV show. But this obsession with the Arctic reveals something far more sinister: the latest chapter in a colonial playbook refined over centuries. Trump’s rhetoric about Greenland follows a template so precise it could have been plagiarized from Andrew Jackson’s diary, only with SpaceX snake-oil slides replacing speeches on Manifest Destiny.

Six years from 2016 we will be colonizing Mars? Let me get my calculator out.

Beta Test Invasions: Florida to Hawaii

The American colonial playbook was first tested in Florida in the 1810s. Jackson’s campaign in Florida set the model: delegitimize indigenous governance, create security pretexts, deploy overwhelming force, and most importantly, ignore legal constraints. By the time Texas was annexed in 1845, the “security necessity” argument was fully polished. California followed in 1846, and Hawaii in 1893, each expansion a refinement of the formula. It was no longer just about acquiring land—it was about perfecting demographic engineering and entrenching settler dominance for rapid value extraction and centralization.

Source: Professor Grace Chee, Los Angeles Community Colleges

Every time you look at the common banana-split, consider how it advertises to this day the sweet spoils of American militant imperialist lies and abuse to unjustly assert territorial domination over indigenous groups.

After America staged a coup to invade and seize Hawaii, James Dole is pictured grabbing a pineapple by the prickly bits: “I swear I just was examining this large hot and juicy warm fruit for quality”

Mussolini’s Attention-Seeking Upgrade

In 1935, Mussolini’s invasion of Ethiopia was a chilling echo of America’s colonial methods, but with a fascist twist. He studied America’s expansionist playbook, applying it to Ethiopia and justifying his actions with the same rhetoric of “civilizing” indigenous populations. His campaign wasn’t just awful murderous barbarism and brutality—he setup a test case to prove that the American model could be scaled abroad under intentionally misleading propaganda about market dynamics or keeping the peace.

In a speech before the Senate tonight on the nation’s foreign affairs, Premier Mussolini declared that Italy is an imperialist nation. But, he added, her imperialism, far from being aggressive, explosive or in preparation for war, is the peaceful, intellectual, cultural and economic expression of a great nation arriving somewhat late at its maturity.

His rhetoric about Ethiopia’s “strategic necessity” mirrored the justifications of American territorial expansion, showing that the template was global and adaptable. After military invasion, waves of geologists and colonial planners were pushed into rapid settlement among the tens of thousands of dead.

Hitler’s Industrialized Application

Hitler took this American template and Mussolini’s systematic approach to deception, scaling it for even more rapid and industrialized repetitive conquests. The Sudetenland in 1938 was his “Florida,” a first step where he proved the world would acquiesce. By the time Poland was invaded in 1939, international resistance had been so thoroughly debunked that it resembled a wet paper bag. Nazi territorial ambitions weren’t impulsive—they were calculated, a direct line from the aggressive bully patterns learned and facilitated over time from Jackson to Mussolini.

Trump’s Digital Copy

Trump’s focus on Greenland represents the latest evolution of this colonial playbook, now fused with two technology leaders of the modern surveillance state (Thiel and Musk). His rhetoric hits every historical note: delegitimize indigenous governance (“nobody knows if they have any right”), manufacture security pretexts (“strategic necessity”), threaten overwhelming force. But now, there’s a terrifying new layer: the tools of AI and demographic control like something straight out of 1980s South Africa.

Unlike Jackson’s era, where expansion meant physical occupation, today’s colonialism seeks to control populations through data, surveillance, and automated systems of the infamous “BOSS” watching everyone to keep apartheid running.

Trump’s vision for Greenland isn’t just about resources; it’s about building a new kind of colony—one governed by digital tools that manage borders, movements, and populations. The modern version of manifest destiny is less about useable land and more about establishing an Aryan Nation fantasy of repopulation by “landing” and expanding a technology driven existence.

Greenland Fits Pattern

Greenland is positioned as a test case, much like how Florida was being treated in 1835, or Ethiopia 100 years later in 1935. The playbook has been refined over time—each expansion and conquest a proving ground for the next. Now, Greenland serves as the proving ground for a new era in expansive colonization under one white man. Canada being called a state of the U.S. in Trump social media is like looking at a racist pamphlet from Musk’s grandfather, who envisaged exactly such expansive Technocracy maps in the 1940s. Trump’s son, arriving in Greenland with MAGA hats in tow, is not just a historical echo; it’s a systematic replication of tactics that have worked before. Just look at Mussolini’s entourage to Ethiopia before invasion.

Mussolin sends his sons Bruno and Vittorio to Abyssinia / Big drafts leave Italy as war clouds thicken (1935)

Trump Stakes Aren’t Rare

This iteration of the colonial playbook is more dangerous than its predecessors. Where past empires used brute force, today’s empire will use technology to prevent resistence and control populations from the inside out. The tools of surveillance, AI, and automated systems are all being tested, and once in place, they will offer a level of control that earlier generations of colonizers could not have imagined.

When Trump talks about Greenland surrounded by tech billionaires, he’s not just channeling Jackson’s territorialism; he’s upgrading it for the AI age. The entitled certainty that allowed colonizers to take land is now coupled with the power to monitor, manipulate, and control populations on a global scale.

This week in 1937, Italian Fascists and colonizers began a three-day massacre in Addis Ababa, killing up to 20,000 Ethiopians. The slaughter is all but ignored in today’s Italy…

Recognition and Repudiation

The historical pattern is clear: after Florida came Texas, after Ethiopia came broader conquest, and after the Sudetenland came Poland. Each failure trained the world to believe resistance was futile except at massive cost of all out war. Trump’s Greenland obsession isn’t a fluke—it’s the next step in a playbook refined over centuries to abuse power.

The real question is whether we’ll recognize this pattern in time. When someone tells you they can “shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue” without consequence, don’t look surprised when it turns out to be the King of Denmark. The jump from “grab them by the pussy” to “grab them by the glacier” is not as far as it seems, and the tools for total control are already in motion.

The world shamefully didn’t register Haile Selassie’s clarion and accurate warning in 1936, let alone Silas Soule in 1864. Now, as Trump’s son brings MAGA hats to Greenland like Mussolini’s boys to Ethiopia, we face a choice: recognize the pattern or watch it repeat at faster pace and greater tragedy.

From this:

Mussolini’s long-expected invasion of Abyssinia began at dawn yesterday… Two of the bombers were reported to be piloted by Mussolini’s sons, Vittorio, aged 19, and Bruno, aged 18…

To this:

Greenland coming in hot…” Trump Jr. said in a post on the social platform X that featured video of the cockpit of an airplane flying over frozen topography.

The template is painfully clear: from Jackson’s Indian Removal to Musk’s family dreams of white settler colonies in Canada, South Africa, and Rhodesia, to today’s technocratic visions of controlled breeding programs in Arctic compounds. It was never just about land – it was always about engineering white demographic birthing fantasy through illegal compound distribution. Mars is the marketing pitch; Greenland is the just the latest aspirational target. Same abusive playbook, just with more emojis.

Not Even Two Weeks Into 2025 Already Two Tesla Recalls

The first NHTSA recall is for airbags installed torn and undetected during manufacturing (SB-24-20-001). Ok, technically the number reveals that was issued in late 2024, so does it still count if it’s only ever seen in 2025?

Planned Owner Notification Date: FEB 21, 2025

The actual first NHTSA recall is for a camera circuit board short, which can cause the rear view screen to fail (SB-25-00-001).

Honda Zero Wows CES as Their EV Jumps to Head of AI Market

Honda innovation was hinted at last year’s CES:

2024 Honda Zero concept

And the reputable brand has more than delivered in 2025.

Their new Zero EV as reported by Verge is amazeballs in both looks and trustworthy innovations in engineering.

Honda says Honda Zero embodies three principles: “thin, light, and wise.” At CES, Honda executives said they were focused on showing off the “wise” principle.

That includes a new, in-house-developed operating system called Asimo OS, named after the company’s Asimo humanoid robot from the early 2000s that was designed for “people’s daily lives.”

Honda retired Asimo in 2018 to focus on “more practical” applications. But the company retained a lot of information from the more than 33.26 million steps the robot took over its lifetime about some of the stumbling blocks and safety issues a fully autonomous robot would have to overcome. When Honda unveiled Asimo in 2000, it was widely heralded as both a beloved friend (which once played soccer with President Barack Obama and could autonomously recognize a human wave as well as moving objects) and a symbol of Japanese technological advancement.

Honda Zero Saloon 2025
Honda Zero SUV 2025

That little robot didn’t just take 33.26 million steps, it was learning how not to fall flat on its face, which turns out to be pretty dang important when you’re building self-driving cars.

Kick it!

And more notably the ‘friend’ vision of AI agents isn’t just feel-good marketing. That’s the correct moral framing for our inevitable augmented future. It’s not your servant, it’s not your exploitable dislocated double or digital twin working in apartheid data mining depths hidden and unknown to you. It’s your verifiable friend worth caring about because it cares about you, in the same way trust works with “true” friends today.

Way to go Honda!

This intelligent EV, coupled with their battery revolution just announced, means Honda Zero is far more than another pretty face in the EV crowd. For thoughtful consumers and transit planners, this might be the one to watch. Finally – 2030 zero emission and fatality targets that don’t feel like creepy technologist-white-supremacist fan fiction.

And for everyone saying “but where’s my 1980s Civic with electric motors” I hear you.

Here’s the deal: Go look at what happened with GM’s Electrovette and Electrovair programs.

Then read about Nissan’s Lektrikar, or the actual Tesla technology inventors (AC Propulsion) Toyota eBox.

eBox was unveiled in Santa Monica, California on August 18, 2006. It was superior to Tesla, since it was designed by the company in Los Angeles that Tesla ripped their ideas from. The prototype used a battery pack consisting of 5,300 Li-ion cells arranged into 100 blocks of 53 cells each.

Then put some serious money up for retro-fit electric kits to keep older combustion cars on the road but instead powered by modern (solid-state) batteries. That’s the most literal path to what you seek.

Why hasn’t the market gone there? Simple. American economics are geared towards heavily subsidized throwaway big new exotics instead of long repair and retro-fit sensibly designed affordables.

In other words, this is bigger than just old and new car concepts. America always intentionally oriented towards an emphasis on the high-cost-of-maintenance private carriage because it inherently required lots of privilege, as a way of legitimizing literal social barriers to entry (no money, no movement, like the days of royalty and horse drawn carriages). Since the Model T (and Ford’s overt hate speech that put his extremist racist pamphlet on the seat of every new car) it’s been a not-very-secret strategy of market-manipulated discrimination against those historically pushed into poverty.

For those wondering why we’re talking social history in a piece about a fancy new EV, hang onto your hat…

Why do you think jaywalk laws were so cynically invented? Here’s a hint: it wasn’t about safety. It was about criminalizing pedestrian movement, especially in low income neighborhoods where crosswalks are delayed or denied.

The harsh truth? Access to good inexpensive cars threatens the racist foundations of American car culture – a system built on intentionally criminalizing pedestrians. White men in power prefer no public transit and car sales to be exotic and expensive as possible, as a means of legally restricting assembly and freedom of movement essential to prosperity. Source: StreetsBlog

Elon Musk in 2016 Pitched He’d Colonize Mars by 2022: He Won’t Even Get There by 2028

Oh how time flies.

So many things he said that were so wrong then, and even more wrong now…

“So if the person and their luggage, life support, and consumption” is accounted for, he said, “ultimately it could drop below $100,000.” A trip to Mars on ITS would take about 80 days. […] Musk wants the trips to Mars to be yearly, if not more frequently, and to start colonization in 2022

I mean the 2016 SpaceX money slide called “Next Steps” promised investors that Mars travel would be all done and dusted by 2024, 30 day rides at $100K.

Why are we even still here on earth?

In 2017 he doubled down on the pitch.

SpaceX’s previous plan called for landing its first transport ship on Mars in 2022. The timeline Musk gave today was similar; two cargo landers would land on Mars in 2022, with four vehicles launching in 2024. Two of those 2024 ships would be crewed, meaning, in Musk’s timeline, humans could walk on Mars in just seven years.

“That’s not a typo,” he said.

Not a typo he said, meaning Elon Musk wanted everyone to know his entire reputation should be based on him putting a man on Mars by 2024.

You may also remember 2013 when he laid out these numbers:

Musk envisages a colony with 80,000 people on the red planet.

Of course that didn’t sound preposterous enough, so a couple years later he was puffing even harder.

Musk says a sustainable colony of 1 million people could be established in about 40 to 100 years.

His sudden escalation from 80,000 to 1 million colonists seems to follow a pattern common in financial bubbles. When initial ambitious claims fail to materialize, even more extreme promises are made to maintain attention and investment. This mirrors tactics seen in other ventures where missing deadlines leads to even grander future predictions rather than realistic reassessment.

What’s driving all this nonsense? A misunderstanding about regulations.

…recognize Mars as a free planet and that no Earth-based government has authority or sovereignty over Martian activities. Accordingly, Disputes will be settled through self-governing principles, established in good faith, at the time of Martian settlement.

It’s hard to believe Musk actually gets away with statements of this nature.

“It should probably be easier to remove a law than create one,” said Musk. “I think that’s probably good, because laws have infinite life unless they’re taken away.”

Apparently that’s not how anything actually works. It’s so dumb as to be painful to think about. Laws are the opposite to what is described, because they are:

  • Amended and modified through legislative processes
  • Interpreted and reinterpreted through court decisions
  • Superseded by newer laws
  • Limited or expanded in scope through regulatory implementation
  • Rendered obsolete by changing circumstances
  • Preempted by higher authorities (e.g., federal law over state law)
  • Struck down as unconstitutional
  • Sunsetted or automatically expired based on built-in provisions

Making laws “easier to remove than create” and Mars being free from “Earth-based government” authority suggest an attempt to frame space exploration in terms of escaping public oversight rather than serving public interests… but I’m not a lawyer.

I do know however that NASA safely landed two drones on Mars (Spirit and Opportunity) in January 2004 and this guy can’t even get one ship there by 2024 to declare his caliphate of Martian law.

Not a typo.

Public NASA missions succeeded 20 years ago using technology far less advanced than what’s available today. Yet even with modern advantages, basic milestones of private Mars exploration remain unmet and far away. This suggests the core challenges aren’t primarily technical but rather stem from the fundamental mismatch of grifters, between public relations promises and physical/economic realities.

NASA’s successful missions, built on careful scientific research and public accountability, stand in stark contrast to the extremely wasteful, bombastic but undelivered private sector promises.

More to the point, he sucks at delivering on his most basic promises that are only a couple or few years into the future. Why does anyone think he could deliver something even further away and more sophisticated?

Even worse, “free planet” rhetoric reveals the fundamental contradiction behind the fraud. Claiming independence from Earth governance hides how these private space ventures remain heavily dependent on public sector research, funding, and infrastructure. Such extremist anti-government political framing of space exploration often obscures its reliance on collective public investment and institutional knowledge.

Perhaps it’s time for accountability in private space ventures, reviewing how public resources and attention get directed based on false promises and fantasy schemes rather than demonstrated capabilities. The real damage isn’t just wasted resources, it’s a targeted erosion of public trust and diversion away from actual scientific progress to publicity-driven fantasies.

The Mars colony promises really are a reflection of other ventures like the Hyperloop and Tesla’s self-driving capabilities.

  • Hyperloop (2013): LA to SF in 35 minutes by 2020, tickets under $30
  • Full Self-Driving (2016): Coast-to-coast autonomous drive by 2017
  • Mars Colony (2016): First humans by 2022, million-person colony in 40 years

This totally unhinged snake-oil salesman nonsense has actually harmed legitimate technology development by creating unrealistic public expectations, diverting resources from methodical scientific approaches, undermining trust, promoting a false narrative about private sector efficiency.

The pattern is consistent: announce extremely aggressive timelines, miss them completely, then make even grander promises rather than acknowledge the original overreach. The timeline above should be particularly damning in how it shows escalation rather than learning.

Source: tesla-fire.com