A hotel in Japan has reported missing one of two 18K gold tubs. The BBC picked up the story:

Staff reported the tub was missing on Wednesday at the Kominato Hotel Mikazuki, a resort overlooking the Pacific Ocean, east of Tokyo.

Police said they had no idea how it was stolen, saying they had found no sign it was dragged on the floor.

The tub weighed 80kg (175lb) and was made of 18-carat gold.

It was normally chained to the door and padlocked when the room was closed, Japanese TV reported.

I think two people could easily carry 200lbs, and they certainly could lift it onto a dolly. The bigger question might be why the only control for a million dollar gold object was a chain and padlock. It wasn’t locked to the floor with secure bolts? Even for earthquake safety? Dual-purpose controls are often easier to justify in terms of expense, especially when there are regulations driving one.

One might think a camera would be in place in a hotel, but since this object involved bathing, perhaps someone thought privacy would be at risk. Fair enough, but the trade-off should have led to compensating controls rather than none at all.

In terms of suspects, the article does mention that only the men’s bathtub disappeared…

I often use metrics in security, and I am always trying to find ways to represent the numbers in a compelling/meaningful style.

Chris Jordan has taken this challenge to heart and created a stunning, if only a bit cheesy, online exhibit called “Running the Numbers: An American Self-Porait“:

This new series looks at contemporary American culture through the austere lens of statistics. Each image portrays a specific quantity of something: fifteen million sheets of office paper (five minutes of paper use); 106,000 aluminum cans (thirty seconds of can consumption) and so on. My hope is that images representing these quantities might have a different effect than the raw numbers alone, such as we find daily in articles and books. Statistics can feel abstract and anesthetizing, making it difficult to connect with and make meaning of 3.6 million SUV sales in one year, for example, or 2.3 million Americans in prison, or 426,000 cell phones retired every day. This project visually examines these vast and bizarre measures of our society, in large intricately detailed prints assembled from thousands of smaller photographs.

Have to think about how to incorporate these ideas of visual representation into security awareness such as slogans and posters. How would you depict the number of blocked connections, or brute-force attempts, on your systems?

Incidentally, this project reminds me that people rarely notice large amounts of similar/smaller sets of data, but magnitude relative to themselves has an impact. I expect someone to say they are impressed when standing at the base of Everest because of the overall size of the mountain compared to their own height/mass and not because of numbers of accumulated snowflakes, dirt, etc.. So Jordan’s exhibit should do well if he uses a really, really, really large format to convey the message.

Phone and cable company control over Internet access in the United States has led the country to fall all the way to 16th in the world in high-speed Internet growth rankings. If you live in the US, you now have limited choices with the highest prices for the slowest speeds in the world, with no privacy.

It is within that context that the FCC appears poised to make another giant blunder and hand over a broadcast spectrum to the asleep-at-the-wheel incumbents. Such a move threatens to hamper economic growth of the country’s Internet relevance by stifling competition in the critical new wireless Internet space.

Consumer Affairs reports that a coalition has formed to help the country:

In a series of three filings with the FCC, the six-member Save Our Spectrum coalition said the Commission should structure the auction of the spectrum, and the service offered over it, so that the service will be operated in a non-discriminatory manner, under an open access structure following auction rules that will allow for greater participation than simply the incumbents.

[…]

In the proposed auction rules, a filing coordinated by the Media Access Project, the coalition recommended the Commission offer the new spectrum at the wholesale level, and should “either prohibit wireline and large wireless incumbents from bidding, or require them to bid through structurally separate affiliates.”

Will they succeed? It is interesting how regulation is sometimes necessary to preserve an open market and encourage growth, but who knows what might be on the mind of those in charge of regulation. Will someone in the Bush administration claim that innovation in the wireless space by non-incumbents poses a threat to national security?