eBay bans IRA figurine

The BBC link is titled “model behaviour”.

Valiant Enterprises were told their model soldier of an IRA volunteer from 1921 had been removed from the eBay site because the figure “violated its hateful or discriminatory policy”.

The eBay policy states: “Sellers may not list items that promote or glorify hatred, violence, racial or religious intolerance, or items that promote organisations with such views.”

The article makes the obvious comparison to other icons who fought the British empire, such as the American “revolutionaries”. And then it transitions to discussing the issue with modern Irish leaders.

Sinn Fein’s Alex Maskey said the decision to ban the item was unjustified.

He said: “To ban important historical facts like the Irish War of Independence is just bizarre. Especially when that time is history has been recognised and commemorated by the Irish government”.

Perhaps it would help if the figurine wasn’t holding a gun and ammo belts, but instead carrying a flag or in a striking pose that indicated national pride. It would be one thing if eBay tried to ban symbols of the IRA, such as the flags or name, but something about the militant garb makes it a more troubling and questionable icon. Likewise, I have no real issue with the Union Jack as it represents so much more than the militancy of the UK, but I don’t think I’d feel great about sales of a figurine of the British army with a Rapparee’s head dangling from his pike…then again, I bet there is no ban on British army figurines at all.

EFF proves NSA facility at AT&T

Hot off the press:

…after negotiations with AT&T, EFF has filed newly unredacted documents describing a secret, secure room in AT&T’s facilities that gave the National Security Agency (NSA) direct access to customers’ emails and other Internet communications

Secret, secure room makes me think of The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe, or maybe Alice’s Wonderland.

The timing might be coincidence a subpoena vote is about to be set for the US government’s wiretap records, according to the NYT:

The Senate Judiciary Committee is set to vote Thursday on whether to authorize subpoenas to gain access to Justice Department documents related to the National Security Agency’s domestic wiretapping program, including a series of secret legal opinions.

The vote comes a week after Democratic leaders on a House Judiciary subcommittee threatened to issue subpoenas for the same documents.

I wonder who Bush would be in Wonderland.

Just when you thought it was safe…

…to go back on the water:

bundock_attack

Catamarans are perfectly normal boats. No, really.

But seriously, I was just talking with a sailing judge about the inherent problem in protests that involve kite board races.

Since the sail is technically not attached directly to the boat (it’s connected by line to the sailor, who is then strapped to a board), the starboard/port definition may depend entirely on the orientation of the sailor him/herself. My suggestion was to ask which side of the kite boarder’s body was windward, but even then it seems they could hop and float around to orient themselves a different way at a moment’s notice.

The good news is that even the most hi-tech catamarans now seem normal compared to the other stuff floating around (pun intended) out there.

Culture bombs

I thought for second that the date was a typo, but apparently the US military was pondering how to make a “love bomb” in 1994.

The most interesting thing about this story, however, is not how recent the absurd ideas were generated but the fact that they are so incredibly ethnocentric:

The plan for a so-called “love bomb” envisaged an aphrodisiac chemical that would provoke widespread homosexual behaviour among troops, causing what the military called a “distasteful but completely non-lethal” blow to morale.

Scientists also reportedly considered a “sting me/attack me” chemical weapon to attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats towards enemy troops.

A substance to make the skin unbearably sensitive to sunlight was also pondered.

Another idea was to develop a chemical causing “severe and lasting halitosis”, so that enemy forces would be obvious even when they tried to blend in with civilians.

In a variation on that idea, researchers pondered a “Who? Me?” bomb, which would simulate flatulence in enemy ranks.

Indeed, a “Who? Me?” device had been under consideration since 1945, the government papers say.

However, researchers concluded that the premise for such a device was fatally flawed because “people in many areas of the world do not find faecal odour offensive, since they smell it on a regular basis”.

Uh huh. It is fun to debunk the plans one by one as they are mentioned and consider the source. In other words, the plans reveal the weaknesses of the US Army more than they give a sense of strength — the American military strategists are likely to be homophobic, dislike sunburn, worried about bad breath, afraid of wasps and rats, embarrassed by flatulence, etc..

None of the characteristics translate to a region that would be a target perhaps most ironically because the targets tend to be the sort of places that would have the fewest things in common with the attackers.