Australian and New Zealand mercenaries arrested in Lebanon

I recently wrote about how destabilization has created a growing soldier of fortune industry (some call it the “security industry”) in the Middle East. That was based on the need by oil companies to protect their pipelines when no capable conventional force is available (or such a use might be too politically controversial). Now there is more news from the Sydney Morning Herald on a more personal level:

A former Australian soldier and a New Zealander have been arrested in Lebanon on accusations they’re part of a mercenary squad that seized the two daughters of Canadian Melissa Hawach from her estranged Australian husband north of Beirut.

[…]

Lebanese police claim all five men are ex-commandos who had staked out the girls’ father, Joseph Hawach, for several days before launching the daring raid.

Police say Pemberton arrived in Lebanon after receiving an email asking him to find and seize the girls for a fee. Corrigan arrived on December 9.

I suppose this sort of incident will be more and more likely as mercenaries flock to troubled regions on behalf of troubled leaders on special missions for whomever is the highest bidder.

It all reminds me of the 1960s UN struggle in the Republic of the Congo when ill-equipped international volunteer forces were sent to impose international orders against a (Belgian) seasoned group of Korean War veterans turned mercenaries. And even after these mercenaries were forced out of the Congo they apparently moved on to other jobs around the world, eventually ending up as honorary guests (long arm of state intelligence services) in some countries. I think reviewing this sort of stuff is all now starting to be referred to International Security studies, although it was still referred to as International History or International Relations when I was a student.

On a side note, it’s curious that the Rainbox-Six theory that Tom Clancy popularized in 1998 did not include agents from Australia or New Zealand:

…we must face the fact that there remain many experienced and trained international terrorists still roaming the world, some with lingering contacts with national intelligence agencies – plus the fact that some nations, while not desirous of a direct confrontation with American or other Western nations, could still make use of the remaining terrorist “free agents” for more narrow political goals.

Perhaps Tom didn’t factor in the more narrow personal goals or did not consider them serious enough threats to people living in American or other Western nations.

Narcotics officer offers video on how to conceal drugs

Strange, but apparently a true story:

As a drug officer, [Barry] Cooper said, he made more than 800 drug arrests and seized more than 50 vehicles and $500,000 in cash and assets.

“He was even better than he says he was,” said Tom Finley, Cooper’s former boss on a West Texas drug task force and now a private investigator in Midland. “He was probably the best narcotics officer in the state and maybe the country during his time with the task force.”

But now that he has retired from being paid to find drugs, he has taken up a different cause:

Cooper, who said he favors the legalization of marijuana, made the video in part because he believes the nation’s fight against drugs is a waste of resources. Busting marijuana users fills up prisons with nonviolent offenders, he said.

“My main motivation in all of this is to teach Americans their civil liberties and what drives me in this is injustice and unfairness in our system,” Cooper told the newspaper.

Of course he has critics:

[Richard Sanders, an agent with the Tyler Drug Enforcement Agency, said] “…for him to go to the dark side and do this is infuriating.”

Smith County Deputy Constable Mark Waters, a narcotics officer, said the video is insulting to law enforcement officials.

“This is a slap in the face to all that we do to uphold the laws and keep the public safe,” he said.

Hmmm, but what if you have an informed, perhaps even expert, opinion of what constitutes “safe” with regard to narcotics, as Cooper apparently does? I would have found it more encouraging if his critics had responded to his point about putting nonviolent offenders in jail, rather than trying to demonize him (“the dark side”) and sensationalize his actions (“slap in the face”). After all, you might say while he was the best officer for finding drugs, he disagreed with how offenders were treated or handled. Perhaps he even discovered that the post-discovery enforcement was doing more harm than good? If he is such an expert in narcotics work and he says his work was actually making neighborhoods less safe rather than more (diminishing civil liberties) how does that constitute the dark side? I mean it is not like he is trying to say it is ok to conceal alcohol abuse or a history of shirking public service and accountability for disasters while serving in public office. Now those issues seem more like a slap in the face, and you don’t see Texas law enforcement crying out much about them…

Brainstorming

I’m not a fan of the term. I can’t put my finger on it exactly, but maybe it has something to do with the violent and destructive nature of storms. Granted, storms do have a lot to do with growth, but I’m thinking the greater the storm (more power) the bigger the destructive nature of them. Or maybe I think allowing people to suggest and listen to ideas shouldn’t require a special session.

In either case I have just noticed there are Brainstorming branches, but I am not sure how to rank them in terms of their “transformational” (sounds better than destructive) force:

there are many variants of Brainstorming, although the basic rules are the same.

* Classic Brainstorming goes over the typical rules and method of brainstorming. Others include;
* Rawlinson Brainstorming
* Imaginary Brainstorming
* Trigger Sessions
* Brainwriting

Now when someone says “let’s Brainstorm” I can respond “Rawlinson, Classic or Imaginary?”. That’s probably better than my usual urge to ask “African or European?”