Elon Musk Nazi Non-Denial Continues: Security Analysis of His Latest Rogan Smoke Screen

Persistent Pattern of Nazi Non-Denials

Elon Musk’s latest appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast yet again reveals the continuation of a troubling pattern – persistent refusal to directly deny making a Nazi salute. In case you’ve been under a rock, here’s the Nazi salute in video:

And here is the same as an image:

A South African Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB) member makes a Hitler salute in 2010 (left) and a South African-born MAGA member makes a Hitler salute on 20 January 2025 (right). Source: The Guardian. Photograph: AFP via Getty Images, Reuters

A new Rogan episode revisits this Hitler salute and engages in the same rhetorical strategies of deflection, wordplay, and reframing that characterized Musk’s earlier responses.

Let’s examine the very exact words used in the February 28 Joe Rogan Experience podcast:

  • “I did not see it coming,” the tech billionaire said, putting “not” and “see” together to sound like “Nazi,” of the reaction to the move he made, which was likened to a Nazi salute.
  • “People will Goebbels anything down,” referring to German Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.
  • “It was obviously meant in the most positive spirit possible. Hopefully people will realize I’m not a Nazi.”
  • “What is bad about Nazis, it wasn’t their fashion sense or their mannerisms, it was the war and genocide is the bad part. Not the mannerisms and their dress code.”

Security Analysis of Rhetoric

These statements follow the same playbook we identified previously on this blog for national security professionals:

  1. Wordplay instead of denial – Rather than a simple “I did not make a Nazi salute,” he creates a pun (“not see” sounding like “Nazi”). This allows him to acknowledge the controversy without addressing the substance.
  2. References to Nazi figures – His “Goebbels anything down” comment deliberately invokes Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, continuing the pattern of Nazi references found in his earlier “jokes” about Nazi leaders.
  3. Minimizing Nazi symbolism – Most troublingly, he explicitly argues that Nazi “mannerisms” (like salutes) aren’t inherently problematic – only their “war and genocide” were bad. This dangerous logic separates Nazi symbols from Nazi ideology, effectively normalizing the former.
  4. Framing himself as misunderstood – His claim that the gesture was “meant in the most positive spirit possible” attempts to reframe criticism as a misunderstanding of his intentions rather than addressing the gesture itself.

The Telling Pattern

The progression remains consistent with the tactics of Nazism that we’ve observed before:

  1. Make a controversial gesture resembling a Nazi salute
  2. Refuse to directly deny it
  3. Use wordplay and “jokes” referencing Nazi figures
  4. Attack critics or frame them as misunderstanding his intentions
  5. Minimize the significance of Nazi symbolism

Most importantly, at no point does he simply state: “I did not make a Nazi salute.” That’s it. He hasn’t done it.

This consistent refusal to deny speaks volumes.

Why This Matters

As we noted previously, this pattern of behavior is how extremism becomes normalized – not outright endorsement, but through strategic non-denials and the separation of symbols from their history. Someone saying a racist phrase, then going on podcasts to say they aren’t a racist, is a tactical method of saying racist phrases without being held accountable.

When someone with Musk’s vast influence and platform continues this pattern, he is using his bully pulpit to clear the space for even more extremist rhetoric to move from the margins into mainstream discourse. It’s a land and expand plan for Nazism to take over American political discourse.

His latest statements don’t represent a break from his earlier behavior – they represent its continuation and escalation. The progression from non-denial to wordplay to minimization of Nazi symbolism follows the exact pattern we’ve warned about.

In a healthy democratic society, the appropriate response to being accused of making a Nazi salute would be a clear, unambiguous rejection of both the action and the ideology. Instead, we continue to see linguistic games, deflection, and minimization of Nazi symbols – all without a very simple denial.

This is how it happens. This is how it continues to happen.

Anti-Vaccination Choice in Texas Soon May Kill Hundreds of Newborn Children

The recent measles outbreak in western Texas reveals quickly how an anti-vaccination choice directly threatens our most vulnerable population: newborns.

Two days after initially downplaying the outbreak as “not unusual,” the US health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, on Friday said he recognizes the serious impact of the ongoing measles epidemic in Texas – in which a child died recently…

Texas is in its worst measles outbreak in many decades, as if going backwards. With over 130 confirmed cases, 18 hospitalizations, and the first measles fatality in the United States in nearly a decade, public health officials are rightfully concerned.

The outbreak began in Gaines County, where kindergarten vaccination rates sit at just 82%—well below the 95% threshold that is required for proper herd immunity.

Let’s dig down into some basic math to illustrate what this policy failure means for newborns. Approximately 348,000 babies are born in Texas annually (29,000 monthly). They cannot receive measles vaccines until 12 months of age, so they depend on everyone else being vaccinated.

Meanwhile the measles transmission rate (R₀) is 12-18 (meaning each infected person typically infects 12-18 others in an unvaccinated population). The fatality is 1-2 per 1,000 cases (in developed countries, which Trump may violate already) and the infant case fatality rate is 5-10 times higher than the general population (approximately 5-10 per 1,000 cases).

Those calculations mean, as the current outbreak spreads into broader areas due to insufficient vaccination rates, the following is now a likely scenario:

  1. Even if just 10% of Texas newborns were exposed over the coming months that’s ~35,000 babies in danger
  2. An elevated infant mortality rate (5-10 per 1,000 cases) is a huge tragedy.
  3. Simple math: 35,000 × (5-10/1,000) = 175-350 potential infant deaths

This isn’t hard to figure out. It’s grade school arithmetic telling us a disaster is looming.

And yet, Texas politicians seem to not understand the problem, which highlights a striking paradox.

The state has pumped its fists into the sky for “pro-life”, demanding babies be born. And yet some communities within the state maintain anti-vaccination rates that mean unborn and newborn will most certainly die. A pregnant woman infected with measles faces dangerously increased risks of premature birth and fetal death.

Behind every number is a real child. Behind every anti-vaccine crusader is a body count of preventable deaths – ironically including the very infants they claim to champion.

The six-year-old who recently died in Lubbock was a preventable tragedy. Parents in Texas like Kyle Rable, featured in recent reporting, now face the terrifying prospect of bringing a newborn into a state where official vaccine resistance of anti-life platforms mean preventable disease threatens their child’s life.

If we truly value life—especially the lives of the most vulnerable among us—then the mathematics of public health demand consistent policy. Pro-life must mean without exception:

  • Vaccination is a community obligation and not a personal choice.
  • Vaccination choice directly translates to fatality for those who cannot protect themselves
  • The same moral framework that values unborn life must extend to protecting newborns from preventable diseases

The pro-life solution to prevent these potential newborn deaths is straightforward, take away the choice to be unvaccinated because it kills babies: immediately increase community vaccination rates to achieve the 95% threshold required for herd immunity.

This single, simple action to reduce vaccination choice would virtually eliminate the risk to newborns.

Public health demands scientific rigor and ethical clarity, not political posturing. The numbers tell an undeniable story: anti-vaccine campaigns have framed a “personal choice” that, by epidemiological calculation, produces deadly consequences. It’s a cruel and tragic irony that hundreds of infants now face preventable death in a state that claimed it couldn’t tolerate a single baby dying—criminalizing one form of individual choice while celebrating another with far, far greater collective harm. Even women who want to have children are about to have the state put them in grave danger.

Seldon Lycurgus: 14th Child of Elon Musk is Named for Dangerous Militant Pseudo-Science

Many extremist ideologies throughout history have combined elements of scientific or pseudo-scientific planning with rigid social control and militarism. These combinations are abused to falsely justify extreme measures by claiming they’re necessary for some (typically racist) idealized future state or preservation of a particular (caste based) social order.

The merger of two names (Seldon and Lycurgus) fits this pattern.

This social media announcement exposes ideological fusion tactics of white supremacists – combination of force/power with claims of benevolence used to justify racist authoritarian systems. The language reinforces a troubling duality where raw power (‘juggernaut’) is legitimized through claims of inherent goodness (‘heart of gold’) – a classic authoritarian rhetorical tactic.

Seldon refers to fictional Hari Seldon from Asimov’s Foundation series. The name represents central control and planning for society’s future, using mathematical modeling of human behavior. It’s like Bentham’s utilitarian social engineering, but without his modesty or intelligent ethical constraints.

Lycurgus is a name from ancient Greek history and mythology, associated with Sparta. Legend has it that the mythical Lycurgus created their ruthless (e.g. cruelly “efficient”) militaristic social system around 9th century BCE.

Seldon’s fictional psychohistory (using mathematics to control societal outcomes) with Lycurgus’s mythical austere militaristic social engineering contains obvious troubling authoritarianism fantasy. Both names invoke significant control over populations and limitation of individual freedoms in service of a perceived “good” in militant tyranny.

The combination of pseudo-scientific justification with militaristic enforcement, as symbolized by combining these two historically loaded names, would create particularly dangerous systems that rapidly lead to human rights abuses, as demonstrated by 20th century fascist regimes that employed similar ideological fusions.

  • Technical experts have absolute authority to implement their vision
  • Society rigidly structured into pseudo-science principles
  • Individual freedom subordinated to “efficient” outcomes
  • Secret militarized police enforcement of compliance with technical directives
  • Values preserved or discarded arbitrarily, based only on utility to the tyrant’s whims

History has repeatedly shown that when mathematical or scientific authority merges with militaristic discipline, the result is not enhanced human flourishing but rather dehumanizing systems of control. The symbolism embedded in this naming choice evokes precisely this troubling ideological legacy.

Musk with Zilis, and two of his 14 known children, exemplifying a concerning pattern where wealthy white men financially incentivize birthing arrangements with targeted women. This reproductive strategy mirrors racist eugenics movements such as “Nazi Lebensborn” that emphasized controlling female reproduction while claiming to advance civilization through selective breeding – ideologies that frequently intertwined with white supremacist concepts of racial “improvement” through controlled reproduction.
Many commentators fail to realize all the horrible, inhumane things they read about Sparta are in fact exactly what Elon Musk likes and wants. He gives Hitler salutes for the same reasons, to promote the absolute worst chapters in history as his preferred future state.

44 Tesla Wheels Removed in Texas Parking Lot. Good Samaritan?

Is it a good Samaritan act to protect a neighborhood in Texas from the highly dangerous Tesla? Asking for a friend who was killed by one of these Swasticars.

The League City Police Department is investigating the theft of tires from 11 Tesla vehicles at 2455 Tuscan Lakes Blvd. League City police say 44 tires were stolen on Valentine’s Day, with an attempt made on a 12th vehicle. On February 15, another attempt to steal tires from a Tesla was reported. Both cases have been inactivated due to lack of leads.

Someone without the proper Tesla app credentials managed to physically reduce these vehicles’ operational capacity to zero? But the app! The app! Software is the future!

Elon’s engineers surely are frantically coding a software update that will make wheels optional. That magical “push” strategy working yet?

Mars doesn’t needs wheels does it? Maybe Tesla can charge extra and call this an upgrade to their future of never actually achieving space travel.

I wonder if the 12th set was abandoned because Tesla’s new security feature activated: does the car alarm shout Heil Hitler yet?

Alleged scene of the parking lot where wheels are being removed.

Security experts recommend Tesla owners implement a new defensive protocol: buy a different brand.