Wired has an interesting comment as Activists Launch Hack Attacks on Tehran Regime

Iran has one of the world’s most vibrant social media communities. That’s helping those of us outside Iran follow along as this revolution is being YouTubed, blogged, and Tweeted. But Iran’s network infrastructure there is relatively centralized. Which makes Internet access there inherently unstable. Programmer Robert Synott worries that if outside protesters pour too much DDOS traffic into Iran, carriers there “will simply pull the plug to protect the rest of their network.”

It is highly centralized, yet one of the most vibrant communities on the inside. This says to me that it is not necessarily outside communities making the majority of protests. The source of malicious traffic from compromised systems, or even just larger numbers of inexpensive systems is external, but the control is internal. In other words, perhaps it is insiders sending protests from systems they manage on the outside. This could be significantly different from the days of Mosaddeq when many on the outside (e.g. the CIA) were accused of trying to control protests on the inside.

The AP reports that a company in California is not happy about code in the Chinese mandated personal computer Internet-filtering.

Solid Oak Software of Santa Barbara said Friday that parts of its filtering software, which is designed for parents, are being used in the “Green Dam-Youth Escort” filtering software that must be packaged with all computers sold in China from July 1.

There is some irony in this quote:

“I don’t know how far you can try and reach into China and try to stop stuff like this,” he said in an interview. “We’re still trying to assess what they’re doing.”

A phone number for the Chinese developer could not immediately be located. A call by The Associated Press to China’s embassy in the U.S. after business hours Friday went unanswered.

Can’t see what’s going on? Can’t “reach into China”? It must be especially frustrating to be a filtering company that gets filtered out.

Sold Oak seems to have a sold case, but here’s more irony:

A report released Thursday by University of Michigan researchers who examined the Chinese software supports Solid Oak’s claim that the Green Dam software contains pirated code. The report also found serious security vulnerabilities that could allow hackers to hijack PCs running the Chinese software.

Might be wise to differentiate the code that was stolen from the code that allows PCs to be hijacked. On the other hand, maybe it would be wiser to get the Chinese to steal code that is known to have a backdoor, which can then be used to prove that the code is stolen? Just kidding, the code in question seems to be little more than blacklist files, which probably go stale without management anyway. Solid Oak could be congratulating the Chinese on their careful selection of code and offering an update and maintenance service for ongoing quality control.

The BBC warns that your XMas photos posted on the Internet might end up in the hands of marketing, and then you can only imagine what will happen

“It’s a life-size picture in a grocery store window in Prague – my Christmas card photo!” said a startled Ms Smith, 36, who lives in a suburb of St Louis.

Mario Bertuccio, whose Grazie shop specialises in Italian food imports, said that he thought the image had been computer-generated.

Well, it was computer-generated. Does that change anything? The family says they are not taking any chances with new images.

They said they would add a watermark to any family photos they post in the future.

Will the shop still use it with a watermark? Perhaps they could also reduce the quality so it is less likely to be useful for window-sized posters in grocery stores.