Spoiled Meat and Sulfites

This site has some useful information about how sulfur is regulated quite differently for different foods, although the risks may be the same:

Sulfites are not allowed on red meat. Sodium bisulfite does such a good job of color fixing, that sulfited ground beef can be rotten and you can’t tell by looking at it. For this reason, the FDA has an absolute prohibition against sulfites in meat. However, the rule doesn’t apply to other ingredients that may be mixed into the meat. For instance, sausage may legally contain corn syrup, molasses, or wine.

SharkFish is another story. Sulfites are a preservative for fish. Theoretically, sulfited fish must carry a warning somewhere near the fish display, but I’ve never seen one.

The author goes on to describe how he has tried to find sulfur in various foods but often suspected the wrong thing, or had a hard time tracing the source(s) of his allergic reactions.

Ethiopian invasion of Somalia

How’s this for the ironic American quote of the day:

“I find it perplexing what the Ethiopians are up to,” said David Shinn, a former U.S. ambassador to Ethiopia. “Over the long term, I don’t see where this gets them. And one wonders how long they can hang on in this situation, because eventually it’s going to turn into a nasty guerrilla war, and I don’t think the Ethiopians have the stomach to carry on with that kind of campaign.”

As I suspected, the Ethiopian government has grown tired of guerrilla forces rattling sabers at their border. Ethiopia has a long history of conflict over the Ogaden region, not to mention they are still smarting from the hugely symbolic loss of Red Sea access after defeat by Tigray and Eritrean forces. And then there’s the less than public subtext of Western forces maintaining a long-standing presence as tactical and strategic advisers in the Horn of Africa. You might even say the ever-present French rapid deployment forces hanging out in Djibouti have been fed up with the Somali situation for some time and, coupled with the American special ops teams hunting for Al Qaeda, play a silent hand pushing Ethiopia into action. Complicated yes, but perplexing, no.

Now about that perplexing situation in Iraq…

Alaska Elephant Refuge

After reading about the recent decision on the Exxon Valdez disaster, I started to get curious about how the Chugach recovered. Somewhere in all the legal and political shuffling a series of quiet settlements were reached, and the group re-emerged from their bankruptcy caused by the spill. But if their way of life was so negatively altered by the spill, which is still affecting the habitat and economy around them, what do they do now?

According to the Washington Monthly, they were given an opportunity to join the military-industrial-congress complex and, as they say, the rest is history:

These same villagers are the unlikely owners of a giant multinational company: the Chugach Alaska Corporation. Chugach Corp.’s annual revenues now top $700 million, nearly all of which comes from federal contracting. The company does more business with the U.S. government than do IBM, AT&T, or Motorola. Chugach and its partners run military bases from Nevada to Iraq. They monitor seismic activity from a base in Korea in support of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. And on another end of the earth, Chugach operates the Reagan Test Site, a coral reef leased from the Marshall Islands, where engineers give ballistic missiles a workout and may some day run the planned Star Wars program. The contract for that one is worth $2.5 billion.

How do the villagers, most of whom would much rather hunt seals and stalk caribou herds than go anywhere near a corporate boardroom, manage these projects? The truth is, they don’t. Village chief Gary Kompkoff is vice chairman of the corporation, but no other villagers and only a handful of Eskimos are even employed on these projects. The projects are managed instead by Chugach’s subsidiary companies–run by white contracting executives from offices in downtown Anchorage or in the Lower 48 states–or by Chugach’s corporate partners–huge firms such as Lockheed Martin and Bechtel.

These natives are being used essentially as fronts, what the Heritage Foundation’s Ronald Utt calls “corporate shells,” because of certain privileges that only Alaskan tribal corporations enjoy. Chief among them is the unlimited right, given to Alaskan native-owned corporations by Congress at the behest of Alaska’s senior senator, Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), to bid for “sole-source” federal contracts (those not put up for competitive bid). As a result, these companies and their giant corporate partners can win federal contracts without necessarily having to offer the government the lowest possible price.

So the result of Exxon and BP externalities in Alaska apparently is the transfer of lucrative military-industrial contracts to people most impacted. While this is clearly good for industry and short-term gains, it is not clear how it helps build awareness or fair representation of the devastating risks from industrial externalities (like oil spills). Maybe the Chugach will reinvest their new money into rehabilitating and preserving their environment, or maybe their hands are tied.

Tom Toles had a funny cartoon to this effect.

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act

Interesting case example by Patagonia on how they generated support for fishing regulations:

Swordfish, like many of our large predatory fish, have experienced a decline in their numbers. In 1998, SeaWeb and the Natural Resources Defense Council launched the “Give Swordfish a Break” campaign with the support of 27 high-profile chefs who signed a pledge to not serve swordfish in their restaurants. It grew to include more than 700 chefs and other food-industry professionals, and was among the first attempts to harness market forces in the name of ocean ecology.

The end of the campaign came as a result of new rules issued by U.S. regulators who halted or limited commercial long-line fishing in three areas off the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf coasts, where too many young, undersized swordfish were being caught and discarded.

Just out of curiosity, I wonder how many of those 27 chefs had actually served a regular diet of swordfish before they pledged to never serve it.

Patagonia also takes some credit for strengthening the Magnuson-Stevens Act and its recent reauthorization.