Category Archives: Food

Critical Infrastructure Alchohol Abuse

The Office of Inspector General in the US Department of Energy has just released a “Letter Report on ‘Inspection of Allegations Relating to Irregularities in the Human Reliability Program and Alcohol Abuse within the Office of Secure Transportation” (OST):

Specifically, a review of OST documentation and interviews confirmed the occurrence of 16 alcohol-related incidents involving OST Agents, Agent Candidates and other personnel from 2007 through 2009. To put this situation in some perspective, the 16 alcohol-related incidents experienced by OST from 2007 through 2009 were from a total population of approximately 597 OST Agents, Agent Candidates and other personnel. Of the 16 incidents, 2 were of the greatest concern because they occurred during secure transportation missions while the Agents were in Rest Overnight Status, which occurs during extended missions where [nuclear weapon] convoy vehicles are placed in a safe harbor and Agents check into local area hotels. In 2007, an Agent was arrested for public intoxication, and, in 2009, two Agents were handcuffed and temporarily detained by police officers after an incident at a local bar. OST management took what appeared to be appropriate action in these cases. However, in our judgment, alcohol incidents such as these, as infrequent as they may be, indicate a potential vulnerability in OST’s critical national security mission

Vehicles with nuclear weapons go into safe harbor overnight but Agents can go out on the town. That pretty-much says it all.

The 16 incidents could implicate 3% of staff. The report does not make any formal recommendations and so it also does not try to figure out if this is a case of a few bad apples or a loosely managed and thereby insecure operation overall.

Either way, the report concludes that nuclear weapons and thereby national security is in the hands of staff who often become involved in “incidents” related to alcohol.

One in Three Tuna Illegal

A report by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) condemns government authorities for ignoring global exploitation of tuna. The magnitude of the problem was found in 2007 when France hauled in almost double its allowed quota.

The report details systematic over-fishing, falsely reported catch volumes, ignored bans of spotter planes to track down schools of tuna and illegal sales of national quotas from one vessel to another.

All told, the investigation paints a bleak picture in which thousands of tons of fish were illegally hauled between 1998 and 2007 – as many as one in every three bluefin tuna may have been caught illegally during this period.

Reasons for the illegal trade are said to be obvious.

As marine biologist, Daniel Pauly told the ICIJ, the promise of a slice of such wealth is too enticing for many to resist.

“Fisheries are one of the most criminalized sectors in the world,” Pauly said. “This generates so much money that it’s like drugs.”

The report said the black market trade in tuna was worth at least $4 billion (2.9 billion euros) between 1998 and 2007.

Tuna populations have been devastated by the practice. Quotas have been ignored, if not difficult to monitor, and regulators are facing a tough situation. The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) has suggested a simple answer — drop quotas to something very easy to monitor that also may be necessary to save the species — zero.

Irish Pubs Fail Drunk Audit

A “trading standards” operation in Ireland used ‘Pretend’ drunks to catch out Conwy and Denbighshire pubs serving alcohol illegally.

Roly Schwarz, community safety enforcement manager for both authority areas, said they used three professional witnesses to act out the drunken display as all the tradings standards officers are so well known in the area.

Sounds like a case of “everyone act normal, the auditors are here.”

He said: “On one of the occasions we actually dressed one of them as Frank Gallagher, the very dishevelled main character in the series Shameless and had him trying to buy a drink in character with change and smelling of drink and he was still served.

“We also had them knocking over furniture, falling over, telling staff they had been drinking all day and walking in and out of places.

“We were very surprised by the findings as we went along and decided to up the anti, with them acting more and more drunk and always making sure they told anyone who listened they had been drinking all day.”

I can only imagine what “up the anti” looked like on Facebook the next day.

About 45% (11 of 25) failed to stop serving. The trading standards officer suggests to the BBC that stopping the practice of selling to drunks will help reduce other crimes.

Breaking the Law With High Fructose Corn Syrup

The Public Health Advocacy Institute has dropped a wet blanket over the high fructose corn syrup lobby. The lobby has claimed sugar is always sugar, no matter what, based on measured levels of fructose. To prove their point using propaganda they have started to pressure the government to allow corn syrup to be hidden with the label corn sugar.

While they play games with the names, actual fructose measurements are in and it does not look good for high fructose corn syrup. It turns out that it has…high fructose.

A report on October 27th from the PHAI is thus titled: Discovery of Elevated Fructose Levels in Popular Soft Drinks Raises Important Legal Questions for Regulators and Consumers

Laboratory testing revealed that bottled full-calorie Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Sprite had fructose estimates of 64-65%, well in excess of the upper-level of 55% fructose generally recognized as safe by the Food and Drug Administration

These levels not only put them in excess of safe levels, defined by others, but also at odds with their own claims to safety.

…the representation that HFCS is “compositionally equivalent” to table sugar could amount to false and misleading advertising requiring action by the Federal Trade Commission and State Attorneys General.

Fructose was isolated and extracted from corn in America during 1970s after President Nixon’s economic advisers demanded that payments for corn surplus should be put to some kind of use. Leaders of the country at that time balked at the idea of paying farmers to grow something and then do nothing with it, so they set about to manufacture demand. The very recent origin of high fructose corn syrup was thus driven by an artificial (US Patent 3,689,362 by Yoshiyuki Takasaki in 1972) urgency related to farm politics, as I have discussed before.

I could also point out the political importance of high fructose corn syrup comes from an even older issue of national concern. The reason corn syrup has been made cheaper to use in processed foods than sugar is due to import quotas that restrict America’s supply of sugar.

Before artificial corn sweeteners were made in America the US Marines were called into action to invade the state of Hawaii in 1894 and overthrow the Queen. This was to ensure access to sugar. American plantation owners feared they would lose their land to the Queen if she maintained power. They formed a “Committee of Safety to overthrow the Kingdom” and found a sympathetic ear in the US Secretary of State, James Blaine. He had suggested in 1881 that the US would be better off invading Cuba, another rich source of sugar, than to let it sit in the hands of a European power.

The sugar of Hawaii is not enough to meet demand today. This makes me wonder if Blaine had realized the safety risk present today from high fructose corn syrup in America, would he have pressed even more to annex Cuba? Alas, Cuba became independent and America continues to try and find ways to dispose of its corn surplus.