Ooooh, I want one of these in my neighborhood. Check out the awesome stats on the engine:
Particulate Matter (PM) reduced by 90 percent over the cleanest diesel buses now in Metro’s fleet
Carbon Monoxide (CO) reduced by 90 percent over the cleanest diesel buses now in Metro’s fleet
Hydrocarbons (HC) reduced by 90 percent
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) reduced by 40-60 percent
Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) reduced by 50 percent
When Washington state mandates biodiesel (B5?), there is likely to be even more emission reductions. Ok, the next question for me is why the “big heavy box” design is still around. What if they took old airplane fueselages that are doing nothing but gathering dust and repurpose them for public transportation? They are light, strong and probably far more efficient. If they rode high-enough you wouldn’t even need bumpers on the fueselage, just the chassis. I’ll see if I can doodle something into an example.
The Brazilians get a lot of press for their efforts with Ethanol, but it looks like they are also making real inroads with biodiesel technology as well. The Inter Press Service reports:
The production of biodiesel from low-quality coffee, from the oils extracted from urban runoff, or from cattle fat is a pioneering initiative in Brazil, where efforts are under way to diversity the raw materials used as clean fuels, the consumption of which is on the rise.
Under the Brazilian system for the voluntary addition of two percent biofuel to petroleum diesel (B-2), the demand currently stands at about 800 million litres annually. This mixture will be obligatory beginning in 2008, and the proportion will rise to five percent in 2013, driving up total biodiesel consumption to an estimated 2.5 billion litres a year.
The surplus of animal fat on the market would allow production of biodiesel that is about 10 percent cheaper than soy-based fuel, a considerable advantage in the energy market. An estimated 23 million head of cattle are consumed in Brazil each year, which could produce 350 million litres of fuel from animal fat annually.
Mandatory B-2 seems like a really good idea. Technology from Italy? What’s taking the US so long to get these types of initiatives underway? Bureaucratic questions?
The US Naval Safety Center has an amusing story and photos to help explain why communication for safety sake needs to be clear.
They also have a page that shows the danger of gasoline. Biodiesel does not have the same issue, as it’s not classified as an explosive (no diamond necessary), but it’s still a fuel source and needs to be handled with care.
I found an obscure news story about a man who was recently killed in Idaho while welding a biodiesel tank. And then there was a biodiesel plant fire recently in California. While a lighter or even butane torch might not light up biodiesel, welding a tank full of oil or biodiesel seems like a really bad idea. Safety first.
I found this to be an odd comparison of harmful emissions:
It has been said that the Toyota Hybrid System produces less atmospheric pollution in 50,000 miles than a person painting a room using one gallon of house paint
Said by whom? This makes me feel better about not painting.