Category Archives: Sailing

Sailing, Security

America’s Cup Promo Video for SF

Leave a comment

This video does a fantastic job capturing the feeling of racing a catamaran…on flat water.

It would be awesome to speed along at 30 knts but that is likely to come from wind above 10 knts, which combined with the tide often brings choppy waves to the city front. Are the giant cats foiling? They seem too smooth and too dry in the video — smooth and risk-free like a flight scenes from “How to Train Your Dragon”.

The engineering of these massive AC45 and AC72 catamarans is amazing; it will really push the envelope of sailing risk management. The speed and size puts huge stresses on a very thin and light infrastructure – more than 100 tonnes in multiple points. Another important consideration is what the air and water feels like at 30 knts — imagine sticking your head out the window of a car driving 40 mph in the rain. I remember when the PlayStation skipper (designed by the same person as the America’s Cup boats) said he ran pumps 24 hours a day to evacuate literally tons of water collecting in the reefs of their mainsail from the spray. And, speaking of details, where is the square-top main?

Regardless of fact or fiction, the video is inspiring — every time I watch it I feel the urge to take my miniature America’s Cup boat, the A-Cat, out on the Bay again and get bounced around. (Note: it’s no coincidence that an AC45 looks very much like an International A-Class Catamaran)

It’s definitely a different vision than the carnage from the eXtreme 40 series, but maybe that reflects the difference in racing style between designers Pete Melvin (Americas Cup) and Mitch Booth (eXtreme). Here’s another kind of “flying” when racing catamarans:

Sailing, Security

CA to Consider Ban on Copper-based Anti-fouling Paint

Leave a comment

Several European countries have banned copper-based paint and several more are monitoring it for toxicity. California’s Senate Committee on Environmental Quality will now consider whether to follow their lead when they hear SB 623 [Kehoe] on Monday, May 2.

SB 623 prohibits the use of copper-based anti-fouling paints on recreational boat hulls. The bill would impose a January 1, 2015 ban on the sale of new boats with copper-based paint, and a January 1, 2019 ban on the use or application of copper-based paint.

Proponents of the bill say the recreational industry hurts itself by relying on a toxicity model. Copper-based paint is considered effective because it kills marine life, which is not only harmful in an obvious way but it encourages resistant strains of fouling that can further degrade marine life. They propose the industry switch to a non-toxic model. The money spent could stimulate innovation in technology and therefore significantly reduce long-term costs to boat owners by preserving the health of marine life for the recreational water industry.

Opponents to the bill argue that they are unable to find alternatives as inexpensive, effective and convenient as toxic paint that they are familiar with. These same opponents do not offer to bear the cost of the clean up from toxic paints, so from the start they do not offer a balanced view of total expenses. The toxic paints are thus considered by them as inexpensive and convenient because they do not account for clean up costs — testing, monitoring and preserving marine health.

The University of California Cooperative Extension Coastal Resources offered the following documentary in 2003 with an overview of the issues including the numerous non-toxic alternatives that have been available for more than five years:

Time For A Change

English

Time For A Change

Español

As I wrote in 2007, nature already has many examples of innovation around anti-fouling in the water. Dolphin-skin paint was introduced to the International A-Class Catamaran fleet, for example. This bill offers an interesting look at the reasons to move away from primitive toxicity as a control/countermeasure and towards a more holistic risk management model.

Sailing, Security

FlyNano Safety Concerns

Leave a comment

The recent announcement of a recreational ultralight aircraft in Europe called FlyNano has raised some concerns about safety. Critics doubt whether the “Harley of the Sky” can really avoid a pilot license requirement just because of its weight.

It is in truth more of a flying jet-ski than a motorbike, since it can only land on water, but its unique quality is its weight – at just under 70 kilos (154 pounds), it beats certain international regulations for license-only aircraft. This could potentially make it the ideal option for the recreational flyer who lacks the means to get a full pilot’s license.

FlyNano

Unlicensed inexpensive planes that take-off and land on water? I can see half of Tiburon trying to commute to San Francisco with these across complex shipping lanes and weather patterns. What could go wrong? Perhaps if it really takes off (pun not intended) in popularity they should rename it the jet-flea.

Energy, Sailing, Security

Efficiency of Police Cars – LA to Save $20mil

Leave a comment

I see Ford pushing the efficiency card in some new marketing (also here).

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department – the largest sheriff’s department in the world – operates a fleet of 6,200 vehicles that patrol an area the size of Connecticut. In 2010, those vehicles drove more than 27 million miles. A fleet-wide 20 percent fuel economy gain would save the department at least $20 million a year at today’s fuel prices of nearly $4 per gallon.

Good overall point about saving money through efficiency.

I am curious, though, if I did not know how big Los Angeles County is why would I be familiar with or want to look up the size of Connecticut? Might as well just look up the size of Los Angeles County. It would have been much cooler if they had made a space reference like 27 million miles is a third of the way from the Earth to the Sun; or they could have said 27 million miles is longer than the circumference of the Earth at the equator. What’s the Connecticut connection?

I also am curious about the mention of a $4 per gallon fuel price. Consumers clearly demonstrate that pump price is not the only influence, but maybe Ford is emphasizing that particular price for a reason. Car companies seem to have the odd fixation on a belief that people only care about efficiency when pump prices rise above a certain point. Maybe $4 is Ford’s magic number.

The pump price is a red herring to me. It distracts from the massive amount of time saved by fewer stops for fuel. This could be an even more critical point for the police — not having to stop for gas during a chase. How many more hours can the police be on the beat now with fewer stops for fuel?

The British Navy famously innovated with anti-fouling chemistry (observing copper sheets left in the ocean attracted the fewest barnacles) in order to keep their warships at sea longer and running faster…in their defeat of Napoleon’s forces.

I usually try to explain the efficiency angle like this. You can’t decide what you will pay at the pump (the price is always fluctuating beyond your control) but you can decide how often you want to stand around holding a nozzle and inhaling fumes. Do you really want to spend all that time at the pump, let alone have to divert to refuel when you need to chase and intercept? Forget pump price, there are many other/better reasons why efficient engines are superior.

From that perspective I hope I am not alone in thinking it is exciting to hear Ford boast of efficiency gains. I am less excited to see that they settled on just a 20 percent fuel economy gain.

The new Ford Police Interceptors, both sedan and utility vehicle, can be ordered with a choice of three powerful V6 engines that deliver more horsepower and better fuel economy than the 250-horsepower, 4.6-liter V8 in today’s Crown Victoria police car.

The base 3.5-liter Duratec V6 engine in the new Police Interceptor sedan will deliver at least 280 horsepower. Also available in the sedan is Ford’s award-winning EcoBoost™ twin-turbo V6 that will have at least 365 horsepower. The EcoBoost-equipped Police Interceptor comes standard with all-wheel drive that enhances handling and safety during high-speed pursuits. The new Police Interceptor utility model will be powered by a 3.7-liter V6 and features all-wheel drive delivering at least 300 horsepower.

I refer you to my post on the 40mpg car designed by Ford and made by Tata for police in Europe.

The Jaguar XF Diesel S is powered by a 3.0-liter AJ-V6D Gen III diesel engine that delivers 275 hp. The Diesel S accelerates from 0-60mph in just 5.9 seconds, while top speed is limited to 155 mph.

That car has the same horsepower rating as the new Police Interceptor sedan in Los Angeles, yet double the mpg. Why are police in America getting shafted (pun not intended) by Ford on this technology? The County could be saving a whole lot more.

Here are some guestimates, based on the Ford press release. It says the current police car gets between 14 mpg and 21 mpg. A new engine will improve by 20 percent, which puts it at 17 mpg to 25 mpg.

Those are modest numbers, at best. Moving to a 40 mpg Jaguar XF Diesel S would achieve a 90 percent improvement ( (40-21) / 21 = .9 ).

The $20 million in savings from 20 percent better efficiency is nothing to sneeze at yet a 90 percent efficiency gain would save….

I have so far left this topic within the Ford family. Maybe we should run some numbers for a 125 mpg diesel-electric hybrid Volvo (285 hp). ( (125-21)/21 = 4.95 ) !

Just for the sake of argument lets use the 27 million miles and say they are driven at 21 mpg. That gives 1,286,000 gallons at $4 each for a total of $5,143,000.

The same 27 million miles driven at 125 mpg would be 216,000 gallons at $4 each for a total of $864,000, and a savings of $4,279,000. Hmmm, where did Ford find 20 million?

Imagine the Los Angeles County police fleet running with better performance and yet a 495 percent fuel economy gain. They might just want to get Volvo to change the marketing campaign.

Again, we are just talking pump price. When you factor in less time spent at the pump the savings and benefits to taxpayers are pushed even higher. And that’s before we even get started talking about police cruisers being able to sneak up on criminals with zero-emission zero-noise hybrid-diesels