Category Archives: Sailing

MIT Operationalizes CIA Robotic Insects: Precision Lethality at Paperclip Scale

MIT has materialized what the CIA has wanted since early in the Cold War: deniable, unattributable, precision lethality.

…tiny flying robots could be deployed to aid in the search for survivors trapped beneath the rubble after a devastating earthquake. Like real insects, these robots could flit through tight spaces larger robots can’t reach, while simultaneously dodging stationary obstacles and pieces of falling rubble. So far, aerial microrobots have only been able to fly slowly along smooth trajectories, far from the swift, agile flight of real insects — until now. MIT researchers have demonstrated aerial microrobots that can fly with speed and agility that is comparable to their biological counterparts.

Insect sized robots at MIT, offering autonomous targeted micro lethality. Reminiscent of 2018 Micro Air Vehicle Lab (MAVLab) bird-sized versions. Source: MIT

The “humanitarian” framing is the… beard. All the “cameras and sensors” they mention as “future work” is sheer euphemism. A payload at this scale doesn’t need to be explosive; a guided needle, a directed toxin, a micro-charge at close range even inside of critical infrastructure.

The evolution from surveillance drone to armed drone to precision kinetic strike happened over roughly two decades. In terms of recent Lebanon and Caribbean strikes, we’re talking about people who market the R9X Hellfire (“Ninja”) blades as precision reducing collateral damage — amputation and destruction as humanitarian language.

Same rhetorical pattern here.

The argument that smaller and more precise is more ethical has been the justification for every escalation in targeted killing capability starting even before “Tarzon” (TAllboy, Range and aZimuth ONly) bombs or shoulder-fired mini-nuclear “Davy Crockett” rockets were claimed to be how America should win the Korean War cleanly.

The American racial encoding of this “frontier” weapon named after a genocidal folk hero (M28/M29 Davy Crockett) entered service in May 1961. It was promoted as a “surgical” strike, in photos like this one, where a white soldier poses as a “big dick” who needs soldiers of color to load and unload him. The Crockett rocket fired an “atomic watermelon” with 20 tons radioactive TNT equivalent up to 3 miles away.

This new technology announcement compresses the “precision” death timeline even more significantly because:

  • Scale advantage: A paperclip-weight robot is essentially undetectable. No radar signature. Visual acquisition nearly impossible.
  • Penetration capability: Explicitly designed to go where “traditional quadcopters can’t” — through rubble, gaps, screens, gates, grills, broken windows
  • Autonomous targeting: The saccade movement they’re celebrating mimics how insects localize and identify — that’s targeting behavior, not just navigation

And look at the funding: Office of Naval Research, Air Force Office of Scientific Research. The search-and-rescue framing is a dual-use press release. The money trail tells you the most likely uses and customers.

The CIA failed in the 1970s to get their Insectothopter (let alone robotic birds of Project Aquiline) operational, for precisely the reason this MIT team solved: crosswind instability.

The Insectothopter. Source: CIA Archives

The 1970s robotic dragonfly design couldn’t handle more than a light breeze, an important context for everything MIT just demonstrated:

  • Wind disturbances of >1 m/s handled
  • Aggressive maneuvers with <5cm trajectory deviation
  • Autonomous control (AI) architecture that compresses decision-making to distributed and real-time

Sarah Bergbreiter explicitly notes in the news release by MIT that while the controller still runs externally, they’ve demonstrated onboard execution.

“This work is especially impressive because these robots still perform precise flips and fast turns despite the large uncertainties that come from relatively large fabrication tolerances in small-scale manufacturing, wind gusts of more than 1 meter per second, and even its power tether wrapping around the robot as it performs repeated flips,” says Sarah Bergbreiter, a professor of mechanical engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, who was not involved with this work. “Although the controller currently runs on an external computer rather than onboard the robot, the authors demonstrate that similar, but less precise, control policies may be feasible even with the more limited computation available on an insect-scale robot. This is exciting because it points toward future insect-scale robots with agility approaching that of their biological counterparts,” she adds.

That’s the tell.

External computation means tethered, lab-bound demonstrations with oversight. Onboard computation means operational without oversight. She’s essentially confirming a roadmap to fly around and find out.

Search-and-rescue framing isn’t just cover for academic institutions appropriating funds, it’s how the Lincoln Laboratory gets graduate students to create weapons without moral injury or considering what happened when MIT’s death machines, known as Operation Igloo White, illegally destroyed Cambodia (Operation Menu).

Scene from “Bugging the Battlefield” by National Archives and Records Administration, 1969
Cambodia Genocide Map: US Bombing Points 1965-73, Source: Yale

Pardon for the Drug Boss, Hellfires for the Workers: Trump Frees the Rich to Kill the Poor

Same Trump administration, same week:

November 28: Pardon for the man convicted of facilitating 400 tons of cocaine because he was “treated unfairly”. Hernández had supported the “freedom city” special “lebensraum” economic zone backed by right wing extremist billionaires Peter Thiel and Marc Andreessen.

Hernández allegedly uttered the phrase that would come to define the prosecution’s case: “We’re going to shove the drugs right up the noses of the gringos.” This statement, corroborated by witnesses who saw Hernández accept bribes in exchange for military protection of the lab, dismantled his defense that he was a loyal U.S. ally. It portrayed a leader who harbored deep cynicism toward the United States, viewing the superpower not as a partner, but as a market to be exploited and a political patron to be manipulated.

December 2: Defend the murder of shipwreck survivors (war crime), saying he “would have made the same call” because… drugs allegedly in their boat.

December 6: Another unfair extrajudicial bombing kills four more people at sea, increasing the dead to 87.

The throughline isn’t drug interdiction because it’s the assertion of unchecked executive power. The Defense Secretary statement that Trump can take military action “as he sees fit” is the operative principle.

The drugs are a dog whistle for the poor and non-white, merely set dressing for a modern day “Birth of a Nation” performance endorsed by the White House.

Screen capture from 1915 “Birth of a Nation”, which President Wilson used to restart the KKK as “America First” and incite racist violence.

What’s particularly revealing is the accountability structure. The man pardoned was defined by a “cocaine superhighway” involving the military, state protection, cartel bribes, even a connection to El Chapo, to explicitly harm Americans. Trump grants clemency anyway.

Meanwhile, workers on boats (who may or may not actually be traffickers, what’s the evidentiary standard here?) get killed, including obvious war crimes by murdering survivors. These aren’t judicial proceedings. These aren’t even the theatrical military tribunals of the War on Terror. It’s “suspected cargo on a boat”, then deadly strike, then another strike to kill survivors. What makes any boat “suspected”? Who reviews that designation? What happens when they’re wrong?

An Admiral who “sunk the boat and eliminated the threat” is a lie. People clinging to wreckage after their boat was destroyed aren’t a “threat.” That’s the language of illegal execution, not interdiction.

Nearly 100 people killed on over 20 vessels, with zero proof any of them carried drugs. The evidentiary standard is so low, it’s nonexistent. Talk about unfair treatment.

..the two survivors were waving overhead before the second strike killed them. One of the sources said the action could be interpreted as the survivors either calling for help or trying to wave off another strike.

The drug superhighway guy trial at least had witnesses, evidence, a jury. The facts are plain to see that he was the primary reason drugs flowed into America. The people killed at sea get none of that, and might not even have any drugs.

The asymmetry between who gets pardoned and who gets killed maps precisely onto class and power. This smells a lot like Palantir, which has been assassinating innocent misidentified people around the world for over a decade with zero accountability.

If you doubt Palantir, you’re probably right.

The legal questions Hegseth is dodging are significant. Killing survivors of an initial strike isn’t interdiction; it’s something else entirely. And the “I wasn’t in the room but would have made the same call” framing manages to simultaneously disclaim and claim responsibility while endorsing war crimes.

Honduran president of drug pipeline into America with El Chapo connections? Trump orders freedom.

Poor Latin American workers at sea? AGM-114 Hellfire missiles on their heads, even as they plead and cry for help.

Rich and connected versus poor and anonymous. The drug war of Nixon and Reagan always operated this way, designed to incarcerate and murder poor non-whites, but this week Trump has made it unusually overt and undeniable.

Scientists Reveal Harms From Unregulated Tattoo Inks

Scientists are raising concern that, with ~30% of Americans tattooed, persistent lymph node inflammation and altered immune response is happening at population scale, without any regulatory oversight.

Despite safety concerns regarding the toxicity of tattoo ink, no studies have reported the consequences of tattooing on the immune response. In this work, we have characterized the transport and accumulation of different tattoo inks in the lymphatic system using a murine model.

Compared to pharmaceuticals, this makes little sense. They’re basically calling out a huge loophole in American toxicology programs and the lack of informed consent. I say American because the study notes that ink composition has been regulated in EU member states since 2022.

Basically, within minutes of tattooing, ink travels through the lymphatic system and accumulates in draining lymph nodes, where it persists long-term (observed at 2 months and then lasting “lifelong” in humans).

Macrophages in the lymph nodes capture the ink particles, and undergo apoptosis (cell death). This triggers sustained inflammation, as detected by elevated proinflammatory cytokines for months after tattooing. Giant cell formation also occurs, a hallmark of chronic inflammation. In other words the body reacts to tattoo ink the way it reacts to tuberculosis, or foreign body granulomas.

And on top of that, when ink was at a vaccine injection site, tattoos reduced antibody response to mRNA COVID vaccines (because macrophages expressed less spike protein).

From a natsec perspective, if tattoos near injection sites reduce mRNA vaccine efficacy, that’s a force health protection question. And if chronic low-grade lymph node inflammation is being injected across half the force, what does that do to wound healing, infection response, recovery time?

Chronic inflammation is associated with cardiovascular disease, autoimmune conditions, and cancer risks. Given tattooing produces lifelong inflammatory burdens, and above 30% of the veteran population is tattooed, this long-term cost driver needs to be modeled.

Source: Twitter

The EU forcing reformulation and regulation in 2022 suggests the science already is there. America however still treats tattoo risks like they are only for prisoners, sailors and clowns.

Aussie Hull Cleaning Robots Reduce Ship Fuel 13%

These numbers are straightforward enough. Deploy a robotic pool cleaner to the bottom of ships to reduce drag, and save huge amounts of fuel.

A recent trial between the NRMA and the Rozelle-based hull-cleaning robot manufacturer revealed a 13 per cent fuel reduction on the diesel-powered NRMA Manly Fast Ferry fleet.

Using its arsenal of 4K cameras (mounted on the top, front and rear), dedicated lighting, sensors and propellers, the Hullbot successfully replaced the role of human divers during the trial to deliver a more regular, time-efficient hull cleaning maintenance.

Doing so reduced the amount of underwater drag created by biofouling (the accumulation of marine growth on ship hulls), which in turn made the circa 24-metre long vessels more efficient through the water.

Furthermore, the AI-powered robots performed critical cleaning duties on the hull exteriors that eliminated the need for antifouling paints.

The buried lede is the reduction in deadly paints. Antifouling is another word for toxicity, because the “fouling” stuff is being killed. These robots reduce a need to pollute, saving even more money on both paint and cleanup from the paint effects.

No wonder Hullbot just raised over $10M in a series A.