Category Archives: History

Trump Injected Nixon’s Attack Dog to Destroy the National Archives

James Byron, president and CEO of the Richard Nixon Foundation, is now performing the functions of Archivist of the United States.

Let that sink in.

Byron was injected when Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s 300-day tenure as acting archivist silently expired on February 4, 2026 under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

Byron’s previous organization was a disinformation spigot that spent decades attacking archives, fighting against accurate portrayal of Watergate. The Nixon Foundation used its radical activist money to prevent a Nixon Library exhibit that depicted the scandal as it happened. Byron sums up Nixon like this:

…inspirational — he never gave up… anything that increases interest in President Nixon is a good thing.

Anything?

People serving the “foundation” side of presidential libraries are not involved with archival content for a reason. That reason is NARA’s mandate to preserve and protect historical records. Byron is thus the opposite mandate, to destroy records.

He is not Senate-confirmed. He was not nominated. There is no nominee. By design. It has been a year and the enemy of American archives is in control of them.

Byron has no graduate degree, no archival training, no scholarly publications, and no experience working with primary sources in a professional capacity. His only authored work is a lightweight gift shop souvenir guide with a foreword by Nixon’s daughters and a blurb from Newt Gingrich.

His formative professional experience was in marketing and fundraising for an organization whose explicit purpose was rehabilitating a disgraced president’s reputation, a job he began at 14 and never left. His mentor, Hugh Hewitt, is a radical right-wing talk radio host.

One of Byron’s first personnel decisions was firing the respected historian whom NARA had installed as the Nixon Library’s first federal director specifically to impose professional standards on an institution that had operated as a family-controlled shrine. Byron couldn’t handle the truth and pushed out Dr. Timothy Naftali.

In October 2025, Byron unveiled a permanent National Archives exhibit called “The American Story” featuring what NARA described as AI document slop, the curatorial equivalent of letting algorithms hallucinate the historical record.

This is not a person who has been trained to evaluate evidence, assess provenance, or understand the ethical obligations of institutional stewardship. This is a marketing intern who has been trained by radical activists to shape fundraising narratives for audiences. He now shapes which national records survive.

How Trump Dictated It

In February 2025, Trump fired Archivist Colleen Shogan. Federal law required Deputy Archivist William Bosanko, a career civil servant, to assume the role. Byron, newly installed as “Senior Advisor to the Acting Archivist,” gave Bosanko a choice: resign or be fired. Bosanko resigned. The legal succession was overridden by a political appointee with no statutory authority to do it.

Trump then named Rubio, already destroying State Department and USAID, as acting archivist. The appointment was never officially announced. Rubio’s portrait appeared on NARA’s website two weeks later. Staff were not informed because they didn’t matter and many would be fired.

On February 4, 2026, Rubio’s Vacancies Act clock expired. Trump designated Byron to perform the duties of archivist. Staff were again not informed, because they matter even less and many will be fired. The portraits came down silently. A NARA spokesperson confirmed the change to Federal News Network only when asked.

The Rubio Devastation

The acting head of the National Archives, as the person responsible for enforcing federal records preservation, was simultaneously a participant in the Signal thread organized by National Security Advisor Michael Waltz to discuss Yemen airstrikes.

Waltz enabled auto-deletion of messages. The person who reasonably should know that officials were destroying federal records was one of the officials destroying federal records.

During Rubio’s tenure, House Democrats documented the “rushed disposal” of USAID records, violating law. Rubio was also acting head of USAID. He oversaw the destruction of records at one agency while he was serving as the head of the agency responsible for preventing the destruction of records.

This is the men of Nixon trying to do what Nixon wanted.

American Oversight sued Rubio and other officials for violating federal records laws through Signal use. The lawsuit is ongoing.

What Has Happened to NARA

The FY2026 budget request cuts NARA by nearly $60 million, a 10% reduction, and eliminates 136 positions. The Electronic Records Initiative, NARA’s system for managing digital federal records, takes a specific funding cut so it can’t keep records. The Office of Innovation, which ran NARA’s online catalog and digital access programs, receives zero funding. Its 50 staff are eliminated.

NARA already had approximately 150 employees pushed out since January 2025 to reduce its ability to function. Senior legal staff with records management expertise have left or retired. According to a current employee, the impact has been “horrendous,” with “bare bones” processing, reference, and records management teams.

Experienced legal staff of the Archives have left or retired, leading to little oversight of federal records management requirements.

By design. By the men of Nixon.

NARA’s budget has been essentially flat in real dollars for thirty years. At current funding, it would take over 600 years to fulfill pending declassification requests at just two of fifteen presidential libraries. A single FOIA request at the George W. Bush Library takes twelve years. The new budget cuts target the infrastructure for electronic records specifically, because it’s the format in which evidence of current government activity exists.

Trump’s Destructive Pattern

Rubio’s toxic role at NARA is not isolated, it’s one of many examples.

OMB Director Russ Vought also serves as acting head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an agency the administration is trying to shut down. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is acting IRS commissioner. Frank Bisignano, head of the Social Security Administration, holds an invented “chief executive officer” role at the IRS overseeing daily operations. Deputy Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling heads the Institute of Museum and Library Services, a small agency the administration tried to eliminate before courts blocked its closure.

Federal News Network reported officials “holding several top jobs.”

This is the systematic placement of loyalists atop agencies to be neutralized or shut down, by using the Vacancies Act as the legal vehicle.

Holding multiple jobs is the Trump signal that none of them matter anymore, all of them are being devalued and collapsed.

What Next

The permanent archivist position is becoming a joke. The names floated include people who hate the archives the most. Hugh Hewitt, the radio host who told Trump on air that his “problems in Florida at Mar-a-Lago started because the Archivist complained to the DOJ” and suggested appointing someone to ensure “we don’t have to do this again” is top of the list. Also mentioned: John Solomon, a far-right reporter who advanced baseless conspiracy theories about former Presidents.

Jason Baron, former director of litigation at NARA, has stated the obvious: a confirmed archivist is imperative to ensure White House records are properly transferred into NARA custody at the end of this term, “and the sooner the better.”

There is no indication that such a nomination is possible when the men of Nixon are back in power.

Nixon’s presidency ended because he couldn’t destroy the tapes. The 18½-minute gap required physically erasing a recording in a building full of people who knew it existed. The modern version is ensuring the records never get created, never get preserved, or never get funded for retrieval. Worse, it’s ensuring propaganda replaces reality.

The man from the organization that spent fifty years trying to corrupt what just the Nixon archive said now controls all of them.

The Nixon Foundation appointed this 28-year-old to be their CEO after more than a decade of spreading disinformation, which began for him in 2007 as a 14-year-old marketing intern

The foxes already ate the chickens and it may be too late to save the eggs.

Trump Wants to Be Unpopular Like an Arsonist Wants to See Firetrucks: The Terror Function of Fomenting Hate

Jason Zengerle’s new Tucker Carlson biography is titled Hated by All the Right People. The book treats a “struggle” to be hated as Carlson’s personal brand—a story of grievance and ambition. It’s actually the operating manual for authoritarian consolidation, and Zengerle apparently never recognizes he’s describing Mein Kampf for 2026.

The Numbers

Trump’s approval sits at 39-42%, net approval around -13 to -19. Among independents: 29%. Majorities disapprove of nearly every major policy.

Hitler’s numbers during consolidation were remarkably similar. July 1932—the last genuinely competitive election—the Nazi party got 37.3%. Even March 1933, with 50,000 brownshirts “monitoring” the vote, produced only 43.9%.

Neither man consolidated power with majority support. Both did it anyway. Being unpopular fueled their destruction of the state.

A contemporaneous State Department analysis noted that Hitler maintained control through “mass propaganda, backed by the energetic activity of the ‘Brown Shirts’, and with the tacit acquiescence of the Reichswehr.” Not popularity. Force plus institutional capitulation. Just like Truth Social and ICE today. Not a coincidence.

The Mein Kampf Return

Zengerle frames Carlson’s trajectory as psychology: Stewart destroyed him on Crossfire, Tucker felt betrayed, and “bitterness” explains his later radicalism.

This is biography as evasion. The pattern is structural:

Hitler: Failed putsch, then prison, then a lunatic manifesto reframing defeat as persecution, then return as more radical… takes over democracy and destroys it.

Trump: Lost 2020 and whined endlessly of a “Stolen election” mythology, then January 6th and returns more radical… takes over democracy and destroys it.

Carlson: Destroyed by Stewart and fired from CNN, he returns via Fox and then his own network, openly admiring Orbán and Putin. Now he “operates as a political actor, maybe even more than a media actor”

The pattern: Legitimate defeat doesn’t teach adjustment. It teaches that legitimate competition is rigged, which justifies abandoning it entirely.

“Hated by All the Right People” isn’t a brand. It’s the rationalization that transforms every fair loss into proof the system must be captured and destroyed, punishing everyone.

The Selection Mechanism

Being hated isn’t as much about personal grievance as it’s treated as qualification for authoritarian power. If you’re willing to do things decent people reject, you’ve proven your loyalty. The hatred is a token, a credential.

Current polling shows 57% disapprove of ICE enforcement. 51% say it makes cities less safe. The enforcement continues, stair-stepping in escalation. That’s the point.

Unpopular enforcement is the filter that builds the apparatus. Everyone who participates despite knowing better is identified for advancement. Everyone who objects is identified for removal.

The infamous Nazi Amon Goeth found grievances everywhere he looked, and he especially targeted experts, as depicted in the movie Schindler’s List

If the enforcement mechanism were popular, it wouldn’t generate fear. The point of visibly unpopular violence is demonstrating that popular opinion no longer constrains state action.

The “Autocratic Backfire” Fantasy

The same weekend Zengerle’s book dropped, Ruth Ben-Ghiat published a NYT essay arguing Trump’s overreach “may backfire.” Her thesis: autocrats believe their own propaganda, make disastrous decisions, and fall.

Her examples prove the opposite.

On Mussolini and Hitler: “it took being bombed by the Allies in World War Two to start the disintegration of the personality cults.” It took being bombed by the Allies. Not unpopularity. A world war.

Mobutu ruled 32 years until foreign-backed rebellion. Amin ruled 8 years until Tanzania invaded. Erdogan—her “recent example”—is still in power after 22 years. Putin—whom she called a “classic example of autocratic backfire”—is still in power.

She opens with a Chaplin quote from April 1939 about dictators throwing themselves into holes. Six months before Hitler invaded Poland. The “hole” didn’t stop anything. It took 60 million dead.

That’s the timeline “backfire” operates on. Not midterms. Decades of consolidation ended only by catastrophic external intervention.

Waiting for backfire is waiting for someone else to stop it.

I’ll say it again, because it’s such a spectacular misfire: her examples disprove her theory.

What This Means

Hitler was very, very unpopular. It’s how he amassed power. Trump also is very, very unpopular. And it’s working for him too.

Stop waiting for approval ratings to matter to people who want to be hated. They already don’t.

The question isn’t whether Trump’s silver-spoon elitist policies are popular, because they never are. The question is whether anyone with power will stop them. Courts that defer. Legislators that comply. Media that normalizes. Each capitulation teaches the lesson the SA taught in 1933: your disapproval juices the crackdown.

The apparatus is being built by people who understand this—who learned that losing means the game is rigged, that hatred from decent people is a credential, that popular opposition is irrelevant if institutions capitulate.

Zengerle’s book describes the selection mechanism in its title and never recognizes what it’s describing. That’s the liberal problem in miniature: dutifully cataloging symptoms while unable to authoritatively stop the disease.

Got ICE?

The unpopularity isn’t a problem for Trump, it’s proof the operation is working.

NRA Chokes on Pretti Case: Promotes Illegal White Gun Use, Bans Gun Rights for Non-Whites

The Freedom Forum published a tepid First Amendment analysis of armed protest after Border Patrol agents killed Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. It’s barely competent, an example of what’s wrong.

It correctly identifies time, place, and manner restrictions, content neutrality requirements, narrow tailoring doctrine. It asks a constitutional question:

When can the government restrict someone’s right to protest because they’re lawfully armed?

It’s also useless. The question isn’t what the law says. It’s who the law protects. The answer to when has historically been that the government restrictions are based on who: race.

The Pattern

Case Legal Status Circumstances NRA Response
Black Panthers (1967) LEGAL open carry Monitoring police, protesting at California Capitol Helped draft the Mulford Act ban, supported passage to deny gun rights
Philando Castile (2016) LEGAL Licensed, permit holder Informed officer he was armed, reached for wallet, shot dead Silence. Then blamed him, based only on a police claim they found marijuana. Refused to defend gun rights
Kyle Rittenhouse (2020) ILLEGAL—Couldn’t legally acquire rifle Killed 2 people at BLM protest Awarded him $50k and AR-15 assault rifle to execute more protestors, promoting “warrior for gun rights”
Amir Locke (2022) LEGAL Licensed, concealed carry permit Asleep on couch, woken by no-knock raid, grabbed gun, shot dead in 3 seconds No support, “not commenting”
Alex Pretti (2026) LEGAL Licensed, VA nurse, no criminal record Filming immigration enforcement, disarmed, publicly executed, shot in back while face-down Attacked gun rights leaders

The Only Illegal One

Every person on that list except Rittenhouse was exercising legal gun rights. The Panthers were carrying legally under California law. Castile was licensed. Locke had a concealed carry permit. Pretti was a permitted VA nurse in the ICU serving the military with no record.

Rittenhouse didn’t stumble into a felony. He got his sister’s boyfriend Dominick Black to break gun laws for him. Kenosha police already knew Black from “numerous interactions” yet Wisconsin courts rapidly reduced his two felonies to a small fine under a no contest plea. Then Black was arrested multiple times again for fleeing police, and for armed robberywith a rifle. Gun crime pays, if you are a young white boy named Black in Wisconsin.

Rittenhouse couldn’t legally acquire the rifle. He did anyway and then crossed state lines for the sole purpose of pointing a hunting rifle at innocent people. He panicked, while hunting humans, and killed two. ICE agents with handguns panicked and executed two.

It was this that the NRA looked at and decided to flagrantly mock the courts and their felony charges by dispensing huge gifts to Rittenhouse: $50,000 and a trophy AR-15.

The only person using a gun to deny other Americans their constitutional rights, is the one the NRA gives rewards. The only person breaking gun laws is the one that the NRA has openly and repeatedly celebrated.

Armed Protesters in State Capitols

I’ve read so many articles about American gun-toting protesters entering state capitol buildings, that I’ve lost track of the number:

However, only very rarely have I seen anyone reference that the NRA’s firm position on this issue was to ban guns. Guess why.

The Mulford Act

In 1967, the Black Panther Party was legally monitoring police in Oakland—armed patrols using California’s open carry laws to document police brutality. On May 2, several armed Panthers entered the California State Capitol to protest a proposed gun control bill. Republican Assemblyman Don Mulford drafted the Mulford Act to ban public carry of loaded firearms. The NRA helped write it and supported its passage:

The display so frightened politicians—including California governor Ronald Reagan—that it helped to pass the Mulford Act, a state bill prohibiting the open carry of loaded firearms, along with an addendum prohibiting loaded firearms in the state Capitol. The 1967 bill took California down the path to having some of the strictest gun laws in America and helped jumpstart a surge of national gun control restrictions.

Reagan’s Lies

History rhymes even when it doesn’t repeat.

Not so long ago we had a President named Ronald Reagan who was known for being a horribly racist exaggerator. Here’s the Snopes perspective on his justification for banning guns:

“The Black Panthers had invaded the legislative chambers in the Capitol with loaded shotguns and held these gentlemen under the muzzles of those guns for a couple of hours. Immediately after they left, Don Mulford introduced a bill to make it unlawful to bring a loaded gun into the Capitol Building. That’s the bill I signed. It was hardly restrictive gun control.”

This wasn’t true.

The Panthers were disarmed by capitol police soon after entering the building and, according to contemporaneous accounts including the Associated Press, were escorted out 30 minutes later. No one was held at gunpoint for hours.

Reagan’s crooked mythology required to justify the gun ban had to be inflated because the reality—Black men legally carrying, reading a statement, leaving peacefully—wasn’t scary enough to strip their rights. They needed the story to be an armed invasion.

Black Panthers at California State Capitol, 1967

As I’ve written elsewhere, the NRA we know today remains very much the same organization with these same values that it suddenly became in the 1970s.

Building the Base

The pattern the NRA follows extends beyond selective defense. It actively recruits children into the political identity. Business Insider reported on essay contests for kindergarteners asking how the constitutional right to bear arms affects them personally.

Leaving aside the oddness of asking the youngest of grade schoolers how the constitutional right to bear arms affects them personally, the contest raises alarms for gun-control advocates. Gun violence was the No. 1 cause of death for US children in 2021… “They’re selling a lie, and it’s a very dangerous lie,” Brown [the president of the gun-safety group Brady] added. “They are selling it to your kids, and they don’t care if it’s killing them.”

Imagine tobacco companies sponsoring contests for children to write about cancer-causing smoking as a Constitutional freedom:

By the time they are capable of making a mature judgment, their health may be harmed irrevocably and their decisional capacity impaired by the product’s addictive qualities.

That analysis misstates it. By the time they are capable of making a mature judgment, these targeted kids—and those around them—are already dead.

I say this as someone who grew up in the heart of rural American gun culture. By 12 years old I had been shot and wounded, requiring hospitalization.

The number of children and teens killed by gunfire in the United States increased 50% between 2019 and 2021…

As a historian familiar with Nazi Germany, I have to point out their children were motivated towards mass violence by rapid dissemination of highly targeted authoritarian disinformation. The NRA runs the exact same playbook (not by coincidence)—capture children ideologically before they can evaluate the claims, normalize the violence that identity produces. An inverse effect also helps illuminate the cruelty. British soldiers in WWII reported a strategy of offering God and Chocolate to melt a Nazi child’s cold coal heart full of false fears and nightmares.

The 180-Degree Flip

The NRA has an origin story that is the exact opposite of its current incarnation.

In 1871, Union generals under President Grant founded the NRA to train Black freemen—emancipated slaves—to defend themselves against white supremacist militias like the KKK. The organization was “a roster of Union commanders” who had just defeated the Confederacy. Training emancipated Americans with marksmanship was seen as logical: help citizens protect the federal government from regression and rebellion.

Then came 1977.

The NRA developed a splinter extreme right-wing Institute for Legislative Action lobby group that suddenly seized complete control of the organization in what’s called the “Cincinnati Revolt.” The timing matters: the United Nations Security Council Resolution 418 of 1977 had unanimously adopted a mandatory global arms embargo against apartheid South Africa.

Post-1977, the NRA represented primarily the interests of gun manufacturers—and arguably became a channel for running guns to white nationalist regimes despite international embargo.

Southern Africa magazine, August 1977—the same year gun manufacturers seized control of the NRA to violate apartheid arms embargos.

Founded to arm American Blacks against white supremacist gang violence. Pivoted to pass a ban on gun rights for American Blacks. Captured entirely after international embargo of South Africa, in order to arm whites-only-rule. Now celebrates an illegal gun used to kill innocent people at a racial justice protest. Silent when police murder Black men with legal permits. Silent when ICE publicly executes Americans. Not drift. Inversion.

The Legal Architecture

The NRA isn’t the only institution built for one purpose and captured for the opposite.

Grant’s Enforcement Acts were designed to prosecute the Klan. The Supreme Court gutted them within a decade. United States v. Cruikshank (1876) established that the Fourteenth Amendment only restricts state action—the federal government cannot protect Black citizens from private white violence.

Southern states declined to prosecute Klan. The Klan’s members often were state actors—sheriffs, deputies, judges—who refused to prosecute themselves. The doctrine gave them an obvious loophole: put on a hood, become a “private” actor. The same men who wore a badge by day wore a sheet by night.

It’s why ICE wears masks today.

Now watch what happens when you reverse the polarity:

The Trump administration is using an anti-Ku Klux Klan law to prosecute Minnesota activists for demonstrating… charged with conspiracy to deprive rights—a federal felony under Section 241, a Reconstruction-era statute enacted to safeguard the rights of Black Americans to vote and engage in public life amid the KKK’s racial violence. Levy Armstrong and Allen are both prominent Black community organizers.

Black organizers protested violence by a federal official. The state is acting. No doctrinal barrier applies. Section 241—the fragment of Grant’s law that survived—activates instantly to target the very people it was meant to protect.

The law was carefully stripped of power by jurists who saw Reconstruction as the crime. It couldn’t protect Black Americans from private violence. Yet it retained full power to punish Black Americans if they dared to confront state violence.

Whatever is architected for safety will be weaponized into a tool of terror. Decades of saying gun registration would be the end of freedom, then forcing registration. Decades of open carry as a sacred right, then wearing a holstered gun in public becomes a crime punishable by immediate state firing squad execution.

What “Shall Not Be Infringed” Actually Means

The NRA is no longer a gun rights organization. They’re a white nationalist political organization that uses gun rights selectively. The Second Amendment applies to people they consider legitimate political actors, and doesn’t apply to people they don’t, based on race.

The Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus—not the NRA—defended Castile, Locke, and Pretti. Principled gun rights advocacy is possible. The NRA chooses not to practice it.

They promote illegal gun use for political purposes and work to ban guns when the wrong people carry them legally. That’s the NRA today, opposite of why it was created.

Mass violent detention like this one in 1976, Guguletu, near Cape Town, is why the UN passed arms embargoes. It’s what the NRA illegally armed after the 1977 “Cincinnati Revolt,” and what it stands for today. America pulling out of the UN and deploying ICE is apartheid all over again.

Minnesota 2026 is Foreign Regime Change Playbook Turned Against Americans

As a historian of disinformation, especially of both World Wars and after, I can’t help but compare tactics deployed by America overseas to the recent “voter” focus of Trump’s stormtroopers.

Minnesota is currently experiencing the domestic deployment of destabilization and election-capture techniques developed by U.S. military and intelligence services over seven decades of foreign interventions.

The playbook is public and extensively documented in declassified CIA records, academic studies, and post-Cold War analyses. It’s what you study if you are interested in being a historian of regime change tactics like disinformation.

What makes the Minnesota operation so Trumpian is the inversion: techniques designed by America to overthrow foreign governments are being applied by Trump to capture election infrastructure and undermine the 2026 midterms.

This is not metaphor. The structural elements align precisely. The playbook is more obvious than you might think, you just have to like history. Although, to be fair, it’s also being said out loud now.

“I’m not sure what gave [Trump] the indication that at this point in time, what’s happening to my state, that I’m interested in Venezuela,” [Minnesota Governor] Walz continued. “But he told me how well that went, which really was strange to me was, he saw an operation in Venezuela, against a foreign nation, in the same context he saw an operation against a U.S. state and a U.S. city.”

How the U.S. Aimed to Overthrow Governments

OG Postwar Regime Change: Italy 1948

The nascent CIA’s first-ever covert action was electoral interference. Facing strong left-wing leaders in post-war Italy, the Truman administration authorized an operation that became, in the words of the CIA’s own chief internal historian, “a template for what the agency then did in many, many countries.”

The template included:

  • Massive covert funding to right-wing parties
  • Propaganda and scare campaigns to frighten voters
  • Grassroots initiatives manufactured to appear spontaneous
  • Media acquisition and influence operations

The operation worked and a lesson was recorded: ballots don’t need to be stuffed like 1850s Kansas if you can control the infrastructure around them in the 1950s.

Refinement: 72 Cold War Operations

America attempted to change foreign governments at least 72 times after Italy. The techniques grew and evolved:

  • British Guiana (1964): The U.S. plan was explicit—“change the electoral rules, then work to ensure [the target’s] party could not win an election.” The CIA orchestrated strikes, bombings, and ethnic violence while U.S. diplomats delayed independence until electoral systems could be restructured.
  • Chile (1970-73): When Salvador Allende won democratically, the CIA spent millions to destabilize his government, funded opposition media, and supported the eventual military coup. A senior CIA official later defended the interventions as preserving “the democratic constitutional order”—the constitutional language that always accompanies authoritarian capture.
  • Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Indonesia (1958), Brazil (1964): Each operation refined the model of using security forces, economic pressure, propaganda, and electoral manipulation in combination.
  • Panama (1989): The CIA paid Manuel Noriega around $200K/year to “disappear” left-wing leaders and ship drugs into America—until a sudden unexplained plane crash killed the Panamanian President and Noriega consolidated power. He remained useful until the former CIA director who handled him became American President and wanted him gone. After massive military invasion of the country, Delta Force failed a dozen times to assassinate him, so they negotiated his surrender instead.

Maturation: The Color Revolution Model

By the 2000s, regime change had been systematized into what analysts discuss as “color revolutions”:

  1. Manufactured crisis (“If the political situation is stable, destabilization must be created in an artificial way”)
  2. Security force deployment to create leverage
  3. Election infrastructure capture (USAID spent $1.5 million computerizing Georgia’s voter rolls before the Rose Revolution)
  4. Propaganda framing the target government as illegitimate
  5. Constitutional/legal cover for extra-constitutional action

The formula worked in Serbia (2000), Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004), and Kyrgyzstan (2005). U.S. officials publicly celebrated democracy promotion while classified assessments acknowledged the covert dimensions of regime change.

Minnesota 2026: Foreign Playbook Turned Against US

  1. Security Force Deployment as Leverage

    Foreign template: Deploy military or paramilitary forces to create instability, then use their presence as bargaining leverage.

    Minnesota: Thousands of ICE and Border Patrol agents occupy Minneapolis—a city 1,500 miles from the southern border with no unusual immigration patterns. Within weeks, federal agents have shot and killed two people: Renee Good and Alex Pretti, a U.S. citizen and nurse. The occupation creates the very “chaos” cited as justification for demands.

    Attorney General Pam Bondi’s letter to Governor Walz explicitly links the two: comply with federal demands and she can “bring an end to the chaos in Minnesota.” Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon called this “an apparent ransom to pay for our state’s peace and security.”

    This is the color revolution model inverted: instead of deploying assets to pressure an authoritarian regime into concessions, the federal government deploys assets against a democratic state government to extract control of election systems.

  2. Voter Infrastructure as the Strategic Target

    Foreign template: Gain access to or control over voter registration systems before elections.

    Minnesota: The DOJ is demanding complete voter rolls including names, addresses, partial Social Security numbers, and driver’s license numbers. This demand extends to roughly two dozen states—all states Trump lost in 2020.

    The infrastructure already exists to weaponize this data. The Department of Homeland Security has built a system called SAVE (Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements) that cross-references voter rolls against immigration databases. Tens of millions of records have already been processed. The system has produced no evidence of the “widespread voter fraud” claimed as justification—but in one Texas county alone, 15 of 84 voters flagged as “noncitizens” were false positives (an 18% error rate).

    An 18% false positive rate, applied to millions of voters in swing states before a midterm election, is the simple mechanism.

  3. Crisis Manufacture

    Foreign template: “The first and basic condition is political instability in the country, which is accompanied by a crisis of the current authorities. If the political situation is stable, destabilization must be created in an artificial way.”

    Minnesota: There was no immigration crisis in Minnesota requiring federal intervention. The “emergency” was manufactured:

    • Claims of massive welfare fraud in the Somali community (investigations ongoing, no mass convictions)
    • Claims of voter fraud (no evidence found despite years of searching)
    • Federal agents deployed in numbers appropriate for border operations, not interior enforcement

    The occupation itself generates the instability: protests erupt, federal agents kill civilians, national media coverage creates the impression of chaos, and the federal government demands concessions to restore order it disrupted.

  4. Constitutional Cover for Extra-Constitutional Action

    Foreign template: Frame coups and interventions as “preserving the democratic constitutional order” or “election integrity.”

    Minnesota: Every demand is framed in legal language—”Enforcing federal election law,” “Election integrity,” “Common sense solutions.”

    But federal judges are not fooled. A California court dismissed the DOJ’s voter data lawsuit as “unprecedented and illegal.” An Oregon judge signaled the same. The Kobach Commission in 2017 found no fraud before being disbanded. The legal framework is a legitimacy facade over an extra-legal power grab.

  5. Target Selection

    Foreign template: Target governments not aligned with U.S. interests or identified as obstacles to strategic objectives.

    Minnesota: The DOJ is suing approximately two dozen states for voter data, which just happens to be all states Trump lost in 2020. This is blunt targeting. Minnesota is a swing state with competitive 2026 Senate and House races. Control of Congress depends on states exactly like Minnesota.

    The targeting is strategic, not administrative.

Structural Comparison

Element Foreign Operations (Documented) Minnesota 2026
Security force deployment Military/paramilitary assets create instability and leverage ICE/CBP occupation; two civilian deaths; “chaos” cited as justification
Voter infrastructure target USAID computerized Georgia’s voter rolls pre-Rose Revolution DOJ demands unredacted voter rolls with SSNs from states Trump lost
Crisis manufacture “If stable, destabilization must be created artificially” Immigration “emergency” in non-border state; occupation creates cited chaos
Concession extraction Instability as leverage for political demands Bondi letter: voter data compliance as condition to end “chaos”
Constitutional cover “Preserving democratic constitutional order” (Chile) “Election integrity,” “enforcing federal election law”
Target selection Governments opposing U.S. interests States Trump lost in 2020; swing states before 2026 midterms
Propaganda integration Control/influence media messaging Disinformation about “welfare fraud” and “voter fraud” using any random immigrant community
Legitimacy infrastructure Bipartisan commissions, “election monitors” 2017 Kobach Commission; DOJ “election law enforcement” framing
Local collaborators Fund opposition parties/NGOs 2017: Alabama GOP bypassed Secretary of State to provide Kobach data
False positive weaponization Crosscheck purged legitimate voters via “errors” SAVE system: 18% false positive rate in Texas county sample

The Precedent Chain

  1. 1947: National Security Act creates CIA
  2. 1948: Italy operation establishes election interference template
  3. 1953-1989: 72 regime change operations refine techniques
  4. 2000-2005: Color revolutions systematize the model—security force pressure, election infrastructure capture, crisis manufacture, constitutional cover
  5. 2017: Kobach Commission (domestic dry run)—requested voter data from all 50 states, 44 states refused, commission disbanded after finding no fraud, pattern established: claim fraud to demand data and plan purges, failure mode identified: no coercion mechanism
  6. 2026: Minnesota operation—same data demands, added coercion via armed federal occupation, explicit quid pro quo (Bondi letter), pre-built processing infrastructure (SAVE), lawsuits against non-compliant states

The 2017 Kobach Commission failed because states could simply refuse.

The 2026 operation fills in what Kobach always said was missing: the crushing arm of the law, like how South African apartheid worked. Armed Trump stormtroopers on the ground create explicit linkage between compliance and creating chaos that only they can “end.”

The “Competent Complicity” Problem

Color revolutions and regime change operations require skilled professionals who understand their actions serve no legitimate stated purpose yet execute them anyway. This is the most dangerous form of institutional capture: competence in service of illegitimate ends.

Foreign operations: CIA officers understood “election integrity” was pretext. State Department officials provided diplomatic cover knowing the democratic rhetoric was instrumental. Military and intelligence personnel executed operations while maintaining plausible deniability.

Minnesota 2026 operations:

Alex Pretti kneels on the ground, helping a woman shoved down by Trump stormtroopers, his back to the half dozen of them approaching to execute him.
  • ICE agents know their occupation of Minneapolis is not standard immigration enforcement
  • DOJ attorneys file lawsuits courts are rejecting as “unprecedented and illegal”—and continue filing
  • DHS personnel operate SAVE knowing the false positive rates will disenfranchise legitimate voters
  • Federal judges rule against the administration; operations continue anyway. Over 300 courts have rejected Trump’s stormtrooper tactics

The system doesn’t require true believers, and it certainly doesn’t want to be popular. The more unpopular the stormtroopers, the more they feel unleashed to commit random violence and spiral aggression. It requires professionals who follow orders while understanding the orders serve purposes other than stated.

What’s Actually Being Built

Seven years of searching have produced no evidence of the mass fraud claimed, because it’s not about that anyway. Just like a year of “releasing” Epstein files has produced nothing. The goal is total control over narrative and physical spaces, to disable state election infrastructure before November 2026.

If successful, the administration will have:

  1. Voter data with SSNs and identifying information for swing state voters
  2. Processing infrastructure (SAVE) to flag voters for removal
  3. Legal precedent for federal override of state election administration
  4. Coercion mechanism (demonstrated in Minnesota) for non-compliant states
  5. Propaganda framework (“election integrity”) to legitimate purges

This is the opposite of election security. Cities are far less safe, America is far less safe, wherever the stormtroopers go. It is not unlike describing the sentiment after Boogaloo, Proud Boys, KKK, or Nazi marches. But this is highly tactical as well, pushing American election capture using techniques developed, tested, and refined over seventy years of foreign interventions.


Sources

Declassified/Official

Academic/Analytical

Contemporary Reporting

Pattern Recognition