Here’s a sobering list regarding politicians who have lost their life in a transit crash.

• 2024: a helicopter crash killed President of Iran Ebrahim Raisi and many government officials.
• 2020: Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Quds Force, died in a drone strike on his vehicle
• 2010: Lech Kaczyński, President of Poland, died in a plane crash near Smolensk, Russia, along with his wife and 94 others, including many Polish government officials.
• 2005: John Garang, First Vice President of Sudan and President of Southern Sudan, died in a helicopter crash.
• 2004: Boris Trajkovski, President of Macedonia, died in a plane crash.
• 2002: Paul Wellstone, U.S. Senator from Minnesota, died in a plane crash while campaigning for re-election, along with his wife, daughter, and several staff members.
• 1996: Ron Brown, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, died in a plane crash in Croatia.
• 1994: Juvenal Habyarimana, President of Rwanda, and Cyprien Ntaryamira, President of Burundi, both died in the same plane crash, which helped trigger the Rwandan genocide.
• 1988: Zia-ul-Haq, President of Pakistan, died in a plane crash along with several senior military officials and the U.S. Ambassador.
• 1986: Samora Machel, President of Mozambique, died in a plane crash near the South African border.
• 1981: Jaime Roldós Aguilera, President of Ecuador, died in a plane crash in the Andes mountains.
• 1981: Omar Torrijos, leader of Panama, died in a plane crash.
• 1980: Francisco de Sá Carneiro, Prime Minister of Portugal, died in a plane crash.
• 1976: Abdul Razak Hussein, Prime Minister of Malaysia, died in a helicopter crash.
• 1969: René Barrientos, President of Bolivia, died in a helicopter crash.
• 1961: Dag Hammarskjöld, Secretary-General of the United Nations, died when his plane was shot down in Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) while on a peace mission to resolve the Congo Crisis.
• 1959: Barthélemy Boganda, first Prime Minister of the Central African Republic, died in a plane crash.
• 1957: Ramon Magsaysay, President of the Philippines, died in a plane crash.
• 1949: Muhammed Ali Jinnah, founder of Pakistan, died in an ambulance that failed en route to a hospital.
• 1943: Władysław Sikorski, Prime Minister of the Polish government-in-exile, died in a plane crash in Gibraltar.

This short list is meant to highlight the vulnerability of even highly protected officials to transportation accidents. What’s particularly notable is that aircraft used by heads of state typically incorporate rigorous security protocols, redundant safety systems, and are subject to extensive pre-flight inspections.

By contrast, modern consumer vehicles exploit technological sophistication to exploit “efficiency” loopholes and safety shortcuts rather than pay for the protection necessary for highly targeted security threats. Furthermore, vehicles that are computerized and connected have introduced a radical new dimension of potential vulnerabilities that are not fully accounted for in high-value asset transportation security.

Consider now the short list of “features” and whether there’s a clear and proven associated threat:

I mention this to point out that any national leader stepping into a Tesla anywhere in the world is clearly in immediate danger of serious software and hardware flaws that send their car at high speed into a wall, just as one obvious example that we regularly see with Tesla crashes in the news.

A state leader in a Tesla is a form of negligence rarely seen, an extraordinary breach of public trust to put themselves in harm’s way.

Though Trump frequently attacked electric vehicles during last year’s campaign, he … sat in the driver’s seat of a sedan, with Musk seated beside him, and said he planned to buy one. […] He did not take a test drive but said he might “another time.” […] It is not clear when, if ever, Trump would have the chance to drive a car of any kind unless he does so within the White House complex or a similarly secure area.

Security agencies responsible for protecting heads of state are well aware of the threats and skilled in countermeasures for vehicles designated in leadership transportation. They never should or would allow a national leader to promote any unmodified commercial vehicle for their personal transit, regardless of the manufacturer, and yet….

A President was standing next to the Tesla CEO to pump the stock price, saying he would gladly get into an unsecured remote-controlled car. This suggests the Tesla CEO may have undue influence over that country’s leadership.

Consider again the list above. And perhaps most important of all, consider the sophistication of crashed machines that can affect the success of investigations.

Three casino executives who worked for billionaire real estate developer Donald J. Trump were among five people killed Tuesday afternoon in a helicopter crash in New Jersey about 40 miles north of Atlantic City.

The long-known toxic Elon Musk brand recently is being more publicly exposed as a clear and present danger to national security. Whether it’s his SpaceX disasters grounding all air traffic in Florida cities, or Tesla Autopilot crashes into major transit arteries, an apartheid-era South African Nazi-saluting political extremist injecting explosive munitions into civilian areas means a known risk that no present American disaster planner can ignore.

The Tesla Model Y involved in the crash was utterly and completely destroyed, scrunched like a soda can under a heavy foot with multiple airbags deployed and its front suspension effectively ripped from its frame. The black electric vehicle appeared to have collided with parts of the Embarcadero and Washington Street station, destroying the railing work and glass paneling. Based on the state of the destruction caused to the transit stop, it appears the car was traveling at high speeds.

Consider the massive impact, for example, if the centrally planned and controlled Tesla products were to apply an algorithmic attack to terrorize and shutdown entire cities with just tens of thousands out of its millions of cars setup to be loitering munitions.

A fiery Tesla crash on Lake Shore killed four in November. Why is the lane where it happened still closed [six months later in March]? …the city says the lane closure is necessary to repair guard rails and the road surface, to prevent [Tesla attacks] like the one that killed four people in a fiery crash in early November.

The Lake Shore crash also highlighted how the Tesla door design defect traps everyone and kills them like kamikaze pilots, beyond disrupting a critical transit artery. The uniquely high death toll of the Tesla car is such a weirdly recurring story as to beg the question why it is allowed to continue operating at all given a South African “Operation Blanket” door design flaw known to cruelly burn so many people to death.

The rapid increase of destruction and death from Tesla is not a coincidence, as documented extensively on this blog and of course TeslaDeaths.com. We are witness to the outcomes that have been easily predictable since 2016.

Don’t forget it was only two months ago another Tesla plowed at high-speed into a row of stopped cars in San Francisco, like a bomb dropped on civilians.

Therefore it’s long past time to consider local Tesla crash reporting as a rehash of lessons from a Molotov “bread basket” of 1939, which led to the “Molotov cocktail” weapon that is remembered all too well instead. Molotov was the Soviet government official who informed the public he was delivering humanitarian technological advances to the benefit of civilization in an automated “food delivery” system, which in fact unleashed deadly explosive cluster munitions into targeted cities.

Imagine describing every Soviet bomb dropped as a local event, describing every Tesla crashed into critical infrastructure as isolated, instead of part of a campaign to disrupt and displace civilians across a nation.

A simple test confirmed what most people already estimated for an “efficient” cast aluminum frame of the Cybertruck. It’s very weak and only gets weaker with each use.

“The Cybertruck is not a rigid stainless steel exoskeleton supertruck, like it was advertised. It is a soft, supple, porous, Mohs 3 level cast aluminum (truck) with the towing ability of a pop can.” The Cybertruck’s rear subframe [advertised as 11,000 pounds capacity] totally shattered with about 10,000 pounds of force on the hitch. […] “A cast aluminum frame with just 3/16ths wall thickness is just a slap in the face to anyone who bought one of these Cybertrucks,” says Nelson.

Pop can. Shattered. Slap in the face.

Not what a truck “rated” for towing is supposed to mean, certainly not. You’d be safer towing with a Toyota Prius.

Well, well, that settles that. Elon Musk said it could float, but the Cybertruck sank even faster than his stock price.

The owner’s attempt to launch a jet ski led to this unfortunate incident, despite Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s previous statements suggesting that the CyberTruck could function as a boat for short periods. Musk has made claims in the past regarding the buoyancy and boat-like capabilities of Tesla vehicles, stirring skepticism. This incident serves as a cautionary tale to vehicle owners [who listen to Elon Musk].