Category Archives: Security

Massive Tesla Driverless Recall: FSD is “anachronistic and just flat wrong!”

The CEO of Tesla dangerously tried to rebrand simplistic cruise control with lane assist as “full self driving“.

His fraud car finally is being held somewhat accountable by the U.S. government.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said the Tesla software allows a vehicle to “exceed speed limits or travel through intersections in an unlawful or unpredictable manner increases the risk of a crash.” […] The recall covers 2016-2023 Model S and Model X vehicles, 2017-2023 Model 3, and 2020-2023 Model Y vehicles equipped with FSD Beta software or pending installation. U.S. senators… said the recall was “long overdue,” adding, “Tesla must finally stop overstating the real capabilities of its vehicles.”

The recall is for every single Tesla FSD on the road.

Surely everyone now realizes just how much money was wasted, how the market has been poisoned. Expensive “full of shit driving”, sold as a safety feature, instead has been involved many crashes and fatalities.

There is overwhelming evidence (as I loudly warned in my presentations since 2016) that Tesla software is unsafe, performing below any human driver. Worse, there’s evidence that human driver performance declines in a Tesla.

We’re talking here about really basic stuff, not even student driver stuff, like “rolling through some stop signs and driving the wrong way down one-way streets”.

Tesla officially failed a reasonable test, which means its owners should immediately file class action lawsuits.

The problem with its recall is that Tesla engineering is always so rushed to market and awful they regress safety when trying to fix their design failures.

Rapidly dumping bad code on top of bad code doesn’t improve bad code… one of their attempts at a recent recall just increased the danger. Their 2.0 was significantly worse at safety than their 1.0 version.

Moreover, Tesla removed hardware sensors that are necessary to prevent harm. They’re still not admitting that massive failure.

It’s a little like VW removing diesel cleaning hardware to cheat the law, except in Tesla’s case their cheats are actually killing people. A LOT of people.

Source: Tesladeaths.com

The recall says everyone near a Tesla may be in immediate danger.

Think about that when you see any Tesla, and how their CEO repeatedly lies about solving hardware problems with magic software. No wonder I’ve been calling them a national security threat.

They run stop signs by design, FFS.

Ban Tesla already.

Clearly Tesla has repeatedly lied about safety and their CEO believes he can say anything with abandon to make money, even as hundreds are killed. It’s called permanent improvisation, or lawlessness.

The dumb irony in this story is Tesla shamelessly tells everyone its snake oil is a cure for cancer, and then it wants to personally regulate everyone on the importance of narrow and specific word definitions.

[Tesla PR] tweeted on Thursday that the word “recall” for an over-the-air software update is “anachronistic and just flat wrong!”

Yo yo yo, stop calling your basic lane assist “full self driving” and maybe someone will believe you really care about any meaning in words.

FSD has been the very literal definition of anachronistic, future capability indefinitely delayed. And it’s constantly been flat wrong, killing dozens at least. Anyone with advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) calling them “Full Self-Driving” (FSD) or other similar terms can be judged as FLAT WRONG.

Intentional disinformation about ADAS features (e.g. Tesla’s Autopilot and FSD only handle basic tasks — steering, braking, and acceleration — in basic scenarios) should be punishable. Tesla IS NOT CAPABLE full self driving, and their sloppy use of language has been killing a LOT of people.

What’s the harm in using the word recall for an actual recall? Yeah, it’s the right word and Elon Musk is obviously FLAT WRONG for demanding people use words only in ways that benefit him personally.

In related news, the co-founder of Tesla calls full-of-shit driving (FSD) just “risky crap” for short.

Let’s face it, Tesla thinks profit comes from destroying all safety regulations, destroying truth and science, so it can get away saying anything and profiting from fraud.

Would you expect anything more from them after they announced “driverless” would be completely solved by 2018 and they recommended drivers then go to sleep?

Tesla’s CEO promised his customers that by 2018 they “do not need to touch the wheel”. This brand new 2018 Model 3 was a typical result. Many Tesla go to junkyards with under 10K miles.

Talk about being DEAD wrong! The recall is small step and doesn’t go far enough.

Without fraud there would be no Tesla.

Tesla Lawyer Admits Design Unsafe at Any Speed

In a bizarre twist I’m sure nobody saw coming, Tesla’s lawyer has very publicly stated that speed doesn’t affect safety of their cars.

A speed limiter is not a safety device. Is it all right if they crash at 85 mph instead of 116 mph?

Uh, yes of course less speed is better.

Tesla lawyers have tried to defend their design flaws by arguing the company doesn’t understand basic science.

Is this a joke? Physics 101 aside, why on earth would a lawyer hired to defend Tesla tell a jury the product is unsafe regardless of speed?

If slowing down doesn’t make the car safer before it crashes into something, then nothing will.

These suicidal free speed extremists at Tesla might as well remove the speed limiting brakes and declare them not a safety device either.

Why Nazi Lawyers Rushed to Behead Sophie Scholl in 1943

A fresh deep dive into the prosecution of Sophie Scholl illuminates a complete lack of justice in Nazi Germany, grotesque absence of law and order.

She was targeted by a Nazi who was trying to be as cruel as possible to women. He had given a speech to students where he demanded girls stop learning and birth a child for Hitler instead. Protests broke out and he grew unstable, angry at the resistance.

On January 13, 1943, students protested against a particularly aggressive Nazi even by NSDAP standards. In a speech at the Deutsches Museum, he had insulted female students and recommended they “give the Führer a child” rather than sit in the lecture hall. He said it would make him happy to put “one of my adjutants” at the disposal of anyone not pretty enough to be impregnated yet — he “promised a pleasant [rape] experience”.

If that sounds familiar, he used a social platform monopoly to mock girls for being hot or not, as a show of unregulated power.

During this state of mysogynist rage he was informed Sophie had been arrested for dropping anti-Nazi leaflets. He rushed everything, jumping to extremes in order to stage a bogus trial with Nazi lawyers and judges conspiring against her in every way. With no real representation, denied any rights at all, she was beheaded almost immediately.

Today she is remembered as a national hero, as she astutely predicted, one of the most important Germans of all time.

Such a fine, sunny day, and I have to go… What does my death matter, if through us, thousands of people are awakened and stirred to action?

The Failed FOX: Chinese Balloon Played Right-Wing U.S. Propagandists Like a Fiddle

Is it any wonder that extremist right-wing propaganda mouthpieces were hyperventilating about a balloon? Seth Meyers probably said it best:

I take that back. A comment on Seth Meyer’s commentary said it even better:

Don’t know why they’re freaking out so hard over a balloon. There was a Russian blimp in the Whitehouse for years…

And now for some crucial history from November 1945 (Report on the U.S. Office of Censorship) on why FOX News should have known to just shut up about a stupid balloon.

Late in 1944 voluntary censorship was presented with a unique problem in connected with the landing of Japanese bomb-carrying balloons in the western part of the United States… Censorship asked editors and broadcasters not to mention these incidents unless the War Department officially gave out information. There was complete compliance with this request, even when six persons were killed by one of the bombs in Oregon on May 5, 1945. Stories of the tragedy did not disclose the cause. […] The Japanese received neither information nor comfort about their fantastic scheme to attack the United States.

If nothing else this could have been a case of simple unity across the American defense spectrum. There’s no good in politicizing such an obvious case of foreign interference, no gain from dumping fuel onto a Chinese fire, and instead every reason in the world to come together and quietly and calmly let the oxygen out. Censorship of toxic speech, counter-intuitively proven during WWII as essential to democracy, is being hugely undervalued as FOX keeps blowing the wrong way.

Or, as I wrote years ago, “broadcast subversion and manipulation by foreign military intelligence or domestic collaborators” has a known fix called regulation.