Category Archives: Security

The Block Plan for Civilian War Services

A post by Bruce about a recent bioterrorism drill based on the USPS reminded me of US Defense Council plans from WWII.

For example, here is an image of The Block Plan for Civilian War Services, a sister association to the Civilian Protection function:

CivilianWarServices

Some more background on the Civilian Protection appears here, as unfortunately I do not seem to have a copy of their organization plan:

This series contains correspondence between the director of the Office of Civilian Protection and officers of local civilian protection organizations concerning the administration of civil defense programs in order to coordinate the protection of life and property from possible bomb attacks. The letters discuss procedural and organizational issues.

Meth Labs and Pseudoephedrine Legislation

Ok, I admit it. I have been fighting a cold. So the other day I decide I should get one of those toxic funny-flavored radioactive-colored medicines that promise to alleviate (pun intended) the symptoms. I go to the local pharmacy and before I know it I am giving them my driver’s licence number, my birthday, my underwear size and promising that my first-born will work night shifts for them. Given that I was a little under the weather, I think I might have given them the wrong size underwear, but nonetheless I managed to leave the store with a box of something in hand.

I mentioned before how regulations impact our privacy and access to apparently “regular” substances once they become a source material for meth labs. But I guess I was a little surprised by the lengths I had to go to in order to buy a box of something that used to be sitting out in the open. And I have to say this still seems like a good thing to me for two reasons:

  1. The stuff used for meth labs is generally pretty nasty, and so a little more oversight and control of who gets access and where the stuff goes actually makes some sense. For example, given all the horrible side-effects that exposure to stuff like methanol can cause (e.g. blindness and death) perhaps we should already have been more discriminate about keeping track of who is going through gallons of the stuff by spraying a fine mist through the streets where children play, no? I hate those moments when everyone looks at each other and says “Holy crap, look at that risk to reward ratio! Why wasn’t this horrible stuff regulated a long time ago?”
  2. You have to really, really want something to go through all the paperwork I did. It made a visit to the doctor’s office seem like a walk in the park. This surely cuts down on the casual user, or the user who does not have time to waste. Perhaps if they make the process slow enough people will be cured of their ailment just by taking the time to get the final phases…. Imagine calling your office and telling them “I’ll be out for the next few days so I can start the process for paperwork at the pharmacy on getting some cold and sinus medicine.” Don’t speed it up, slow it down. Or, when someone asks for your papers, choose a different (less toxic) product instead.
  3. It helps provide data for research on controls and externalities.

Ok, three reasons. I told you I was sick, right? Speaking of that last reason, I just noticed that the Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Controls (OBNDDC — hard to say three times fast, eh? I hear that correct pronunciation of the acronym is now part of their sobriety test) has posted some interesting numbers on the rise (and apparent fall) of Meth labs. Their site suggests that HB 2176, which started controlling access to meth ingredients in April 2004, has led to a sharp decline in the number of meth lab seizures (down from approximately 1200 in 2003 to only 300 in 2005, with many non-operational). Impressive numbers, but what if locking down ingredients has just forced the criminals to making a different drug instead? Good deal, I say, and let’s hope they move to something less environmentally toxic (less risk and cost to law enforcement officers, neighborhoods, etc.).

By the way, here‘s a good explanation of the risks from windshield wiper fluid as well as an alternative home-brew recipe:

Commercial windshield wiper fluid is not a complex substance. There are three basic ingredients: water, a detergent and, to keep it from freezing, methyl alcohol or methanol. It’s the methanol that makes it dangerous. Methanol is corrosive and toxic, and can cause blindness or death if ingested. Like antifreeze, wiper fluid is also harmful to pets, should any be spilled on the ground.

Just the sort of thing you want to spray into the air at speed, right?

You can make a relatively benign washer fluid yourself with one part alcohol (pure alcohol, not isopropyl) and ammonia mixture and two parts water. If you use too much water, the mixture will freeze in the lines on cold days and destroy your washer pump. A further problem arises, says the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission’s Ken Giles, if your homemade washer fluid is not properly labeled or stored in a childproof container. Do-it-yourselfers should take both precautions.

Er, ammonia doesn’t seem like much of a step away from toxicity and controlled substances. Destroy the pump? That’s a bit dramatic. What if it never gets below freezing in my area? Should methanol still be included by default in all fluid? Doesn’t make sense to me, given the risks with no/minimal reward.

Anyone have a recipe for non-toxic washer fluid or cold and sinus medicine?

Another affordable mobile web device

The Hindu Business Line reports that there is a new full-featured mobile device for web surfing that costs less than US$50:

Datawind is working on a device `Surfer box’ in association with Nasscom Foundation, which will cost below Rs 2,000.”

The trials for the interface box device are on and it will be available in the country by March 2007.
[…]

“Users now have the power to access the Web anywhere and anytime, using the technology they desire based on cost and device needs and the `PocketSurfer’ does all of this while offering a desktop-quality Web experience in a device small enough for a breast pocket or purse,” Mr Tuli added.

Unlike mobile devices such as PDAs and cell phones, the PocketSurfer displays fully functional Web pages complete with images, scripts, colours, and plug-ins.

Sounds great, other than the fact that the Pocketsurfer can’t print or play music (I don’t know, is that desktop-quality?) and the fact that many PDAs and cell phones offer fully function web pages…

A little digging on the Datawind site provides a feature comparison between their PocketSurfer and other mobile devices, along with some pretty bold claims on the marketing pages:

A unique wireless web access solution that boosts wireless throughput by a factor of more than 10X.

Wow, 10X the speed from a device using your cell phone as a modem, compared with using the cell phone itself? Unusual. Not much info on how that is accomplished or what it looks like. Demo please?

What’s also missing is any discussion or page on security of this device and the Surfer Box. How do you tie these things to the identity of the individual user, or is it designed to be used by whole villages, like a kiosk? Seems like they might be using a proprietary uplink and IDs on the hardware. Is it capable of multiple users? Can you trust it? Apparently these are not frequently asked questions. And comments like this one make me suspicious:

What OS (Operating System) does the PocketSurfer? Use?

The Web is the OS for the Pocket Surfer.

Yeah, ok. Did these guys work for Sun marketing? Let’s see the protocol and cache.

Securing the pipelines

I was poking around some security sites to get some perspective on the situation in Iraq when I found a curious and rather dark summary from Erinys:

Between August 2003 and December 2004, Erinys Iraq, trained, equipped and mobilised a 16,000 strong Iraqi guard force to protect the pipelines. This was achieved against a backdrop of a rapidly deteriorating security environment.

The OPF brochure tells the story of how Erinys achieved what it did, in many cases against the odds, and examines some of the broad operational, political and contractual factors which shaped the force. It also introduces the reader to an eclectic mix of people who worked as an effective team in an extraordinary time and place in history, and who, with sheer single minded determination, created something that made a powerful difference for the better.

With that kind of language, you might almost think someone was working on a cure for cancer or solving the problems in Darfur. Sorry, no, actually Erinys was fighting to stem the flow of “$8million in revenue per day due to sabotage on [Iraq’s] northern oil and gas pipelines”. The powerful difference for the better was thus an operating cost reduction for the oil companies in Iraq, through the use of tens of thousands of armed guards. Not exactly the kind of security to write home about if your objective is human rights, especially as some people can get so anti-mercenary and attempt to regulate the soldier of fortune industry, which just drives costs back up again for the oil industry. (Note: sarcasm should be detected here).

It makes for an interesting alternative news source (“backdrop of a rapidly deteriorating security environment”) and I am sure there are some oil companies with installations in unstable political environments who are curious to know exactly how it was done. In fact, it looks like Erinsys recently opened a new office in Houston, perhaps in anticipation of the hurricane season…

“Mr. Mac Namee’s broad experience as a former United Kingdom Special Forces Officer with extensive seconded service with MI5 along with his current, active involvement in international oil and gas security advisory business can play an important role when our Company needs guidelines for large international projects,” said Alex Genin — CEO and President of [First Capital International, Inc.].

[…]

“I am extremely pleased to be invited to join First Capital International’s Security Advisory Board,” said Mr. Richard Mac Namee who went on to further state: “This innovative counter-terrorist technology developed by First Capital International has outstanding marketing possibilities and has great potential benefits for marine insurance carriers worldwide. I also believe that the technology package will contribute greatly to mitigating the associated risks of LNG transportation and possibly even prevent a major terrorist-related disaster for the LNG shipping industry.”

I like that quote. It makes me wonder if they could put it on surveillance product labels, or at least on the marketing website: “May prevent major terrorist-related disasters. Possible side effects include loss of freedom…”