Category Archives: Security

BioDiesel technology leap

Biodiesel production is typically done with refined or edible oils using methanol and an alkaline catalyst. Edible oils are usually diverted to human consumption, so people often mistakenly believe biodiesel will cause conflict with food availability. Edible oils are not a requirement of diesel, however, for two simple reasons:

  1. A large amount of oils and fats are available that are not edible or refined but still can be converted with new technology into biodiesel. This includes waste oil, as well as oil from waste.
  2. Engines can be converted with new technology to run on non-edible oils as well as petroleum diesel and biodiesel. This is how Rudolph originally envisioned things.

The second seems less likely to emerge in mass numbers because the complexity of a hardware solution and support. There are engines and conversion kits today. However, hardware solutions present a far greater task to create, deploy and support than to create a new refinement technique for the supply-chain that produces a consistent grade of fuel from waste.

With regard to the first solution, biodiesel researchers and manufacturers found that alkaline-esterification of certain oils had problems with high levels of free fatty acids (FFA). The FFA react with the alkaline catalyst and generate soaps that inhibit the separation of the ester and glycerin.

One solution is to convert high FFA oils into mono-esters. In other words, an acid esterification phase will convert some of the FFA into biodiesel. This process has been found to be successful already with rubber seeds and even tobacco:

The tobacco biodiesel obtained had the fuel properties within the limits prescribed by the latest American (ASTM D 6751-02) and European (DIN EN 14214) standards, except a somewhat higher acid value than that prescribed by the latter standard (<0.5). Thus, tobacco seeds (TS), as agricultural wastes, might be a valuable renewable raw material for the biodiesel production.

An even more interesting system has been described (somewhat exuberantly) by Gas 2.0. The author suggests that technology has finally begun to reach a reasonable level of efficiency for conversion of waste to fuel.

Basically, the process works like this:

* Raw fats and oils of any type are combined with an alcohol
* This mixture is fed through a sulfated zirconia column heated to 300 degrees Celsius
* Their Easy Fatty Acid Removal (EFAR) system recycles any unreacted raw material back through the reactor
* Excess alcohol is recycled back through the reactor
* Pure biodiesel comes out the end

The advantages of the system are:

* No waste produced; No washing or neutralizing of the biodiesel is necessary
* 100% conversion of raw materials to biodiesel
* Any raw fat or oil can be used to make biodiesel
* Very efficient due to heat recapture from the column
* Sulfated zirconia catalyst never needs replacing
* Very small footprint of the reactor system, uses an extremely small amount of area for the amount of biodiesel produced
* Essentially no emissions and no waste stream from the process; Easy permitting from the government

Sounds very steezy. I am reminded of the vehicles in the book Ring World, where the driver would toss garbage into a hopper for fuel.

A company called Ever Cat Fuels has been created to push the technology and apparently will license it to others three to five years from now.

Germans debate privacy laws

Reuters reports that Germans are demanding tougher laws following another breach/scandal:

On Monday, privacy officials also said they were able to buy 6 million pieces of personal data, including bank and phone details, undercover on the Internet for 850 euros ($1,248).

Officials have said the information seemed to have been stolen from lottery firms’ files or mobile phone contracts.

Will this be an EU effort, or a regional effort similar to the rise of US breach disclosure laws?

Bee Death Clues Obscured by EPA

A friend pointed me to an article in Southern Studies that suggests there are new clues in the race to find the cause of massive bee death:

Five years ago, EPA registered a new pesticide known as clothianidin under the condition that the manufacturer — North Carolina-based Bayer CropScience — submit studies about the product’s effect on bees. The NRDC requested those studies from the EPA under the Freedom of Information Act, but the agency has declined to disclose them.

The significance of this has been handled very differently elsewhere. Most of the article seems to be a reprint of information found in The Guardian:

Tests on dead bees showed that 99% of those examined had a build-up of clothianidin. The chemical, produced by Bayer CropScience, a subsidiary of the German chemical giant Bayer, is sold in Europe under the trade name Poncho.

[…]

The company says an application error by the seed company which failed to use the glue-like substance that sticks the pesticide to the seed, led to the chemical getting into the air.

That sounds very conclusive. Why is the US so slow to act? The harm to bees surely outweighs the harm to pesticide companies. The Southern Studies article suggests one of every three mouthfuls of food in America is owed to bee pollination. It does not say how many are owed to pesticides. The Guardian presents two sides of the story:

Bayer has always maintained that imidacloprid is safe for bees if correctly applied.

[…]

Philipp Mimkes, spokesman for the German-based Coalition Against Bayer Dangers, said: “We have been pointing out the risks of neonicotinoids for almost 10 years now. This proves without a doubt that the chemicals can come into contact with bees and kill them. These pesticides shouldn’t be on the market.”

I guess it just depends on whether those regulating the market care more about long term safety and security of the environment, or more about Bayer’s bottom line. France and Germany have banned the pesticides, while the US seems unsure how to manage risk of colony collapse when profits are on the line.

Francis Picabia

I have a growing fascination with Francis Picabia, not least of all because of some of the quotes I have found attributed to him:

“Who is with me is against me.”

“What I like least about others is myself.”

“The world is divided into two categories: failures and unknowns.”

“My ass contemplates those who talk behind my back.”

His poetry is strangely inspirational:

IN ORDER TO LOVE
SOMETHING YOU HAVE TO
HAVE SEEN IT OR HEARD IT

FOR A LONG TIME YOU BUNCH OF IDIOTS

I find it fitting that he challenged order and reason in a way commonly associated with the term “hacker” today. So sad he has already passed. He would have been an amazing keynote to Blackhat, unlike the inanely boring LSE professor who was chosen for this year.

My early thoughts were to resist Dada-ism, but I wonder if with age I might be sliding into it nonetheless.