Category Archives: Security

Silicon Valley Dumping Deadly Tesla Cybertrucks on Las Vegas Police

Sheriff Kevin McMahill stood before nearly a dozen Tesla Cybertrucks this week and declared: “Welcome to the future of policing.” Corruption. Preventable death. Silicon Valley billionaire tax shelter.

When asked about cost comparisons of the undesireable dodo-trucks to standard police vehicles, McMahill admitted:

“We haven’t done a cost comparison yet.”

Record scratch.

Las Vegas Metro adopted 10 Cybertrucks from Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Ben Horowitz, allowing him to claim $8-9 million value? And that’s that? Are we supposed to believe a town that runs on casinos can’t do the math?

Here’s the scam analysis they refused to do:

Cost Category (10 years) 10 Cybertrucks 10 Ford Interceptors Delta
Purchase & Upfitting $0 $600,000 -$600,000
Charging Infrastructure $80,000 $0 +$80,000
Training $100,000 $5,000 +$95,000
Insurance $800,000 $300,000 +$500,000
Maintenance $550,000 $200,000 +$350,000
Parts delays coverage $100,000 $20,000 +$80,000
Software subscriptions $120,000 $0 +$120,000
Fuel/Electricity $36,000 $180,000 -$144,000
Battery replacement $250,000 $0 +$250,000
Resale/Disposal -$80,000 -$50,000 +$30,000
Total $2,036,000 $1,285,000 +$751,000

Translation:

Horowitz claims a $3.6M tax deduction he doesn’t need.

Las Vegas taxpayers get stuck with a $751,000 more over ten years.

Tesla gets to claim it sold more than zero Cybertrucks.

How many preventable injuries/deaths occur because a police chief did a billionaire a favor instead of… a duty to perform basic safety analysis?

McMahill himself admitted that police departments deploying electric vehicles “are only getting six or seven hours of use out of them” on 10-hour shifts.

He said the vehicle is unfit for use, while announcing deployment anyway.

Oh, but it’s far worse. Steer-by-wire systems in Cybertrucks operate without mechanical backup. When the system fails, steering fails. Current litigation involving Cybertruck crashes has documented these failure modes through CAN bus data analysis.

Single-point-of-failure systems don’t belong in emergency response vehicles.

The Cybertruck is a dubious waste of time and money at best, and a sudden death trap at worst.

What happens next:

  • Right away: Officer battery dies mid-response and has to call backup, delayed. Incident escalates.
  • Soon: Steer-by-wire fails during pursuit, like in Piedmont. Crash occurs. Lawsuit filed.
  • Later: 12V battery failure bricks vehicle during shift. Officer stranded.
  • Eventually: Vehicles reassigned to “community outreach.” Department buys from actual engineers instead of giving tax shelters to billionaires.

Risk projection over 5 years:

Incident Type Expected Frequency
Battery failures stranding officers 15-25
12V system failures disabling vehicle 10-20
Steer-by-wire failures during pursuit 3-8
Fatalities from system failure 1-2
Serious injuries 3-8

These projections use Tesla’s civilian fleet incident rates adjusted for police operational stress: high-speed pursuits, emergency response requirements, mandatory 10-12 hour shifts in vehicles rated for 6-7 hours.

What Horowitz actually dumped:

  • Depreciating assets with unknown police-use reliability
  • Vendor lock-in to Tesla’s service monopoly
  • $751,000 in excess operational costs
  • Unlimited liability exposure for system failures
  • Officers as disposable guinea pigs for unproven technology, let alone everyone around them

This isn’t speculation. Other departments already failed:

  • Bargersville, IN: Abandoned EV expansion. Officers refused to trust range during emergencies.
  • Ukiah, CA: Relegated to administrative use. Chief: “Great for parking enforcement, useless for real police work.”
  • Fort Lauderdale, FL: Insurance 2.4x higher. Service downtime 18 days vs. 3 days for Ford fleet.
  • Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Required supplemental gas vehicles. Community complaints about “looking for chargers instead of patrolling.”

What Horowitz received:

  • $3.6M tax deduction (at 40% rate)
  • Police PR about vehicle the public hates
  • A place to dump failure to cook Tesla numbers

Net result: Horowitz profits $1.6 million while offloading huge deadly liability onto Vegas taxpayers and visitors.

Tesladeaths.com documents approximately 500 deaths linked to Tesla vehicles. Those were civilians who chose to buy them, who could choose when to drive them, who weren’t mandated to use them during emergencies.

Las Vegas police officers will be ordered to patrol in defective vehicles that can’t reliably complete their shifts, have dangerous design defects like inoperable doors and steer-by-wire failure modes, and lock them into Tesla’s service network during equipment failures.

When the first critical incident occurs, lawsuits won’t cite “unforeseen circumstances.” They’ll cite McMahill’s statement:

“We haven’t done a cost comparison yet.”

That admission transforms every subsequent incident from accident to negligence.

What should happen:

  • LVMPD should commission independent safety analysis before deployment
  • Nevada AG should investigate whether this violates procurement regulations
  • Officers’ union should file grievance about unsafe equipment and threat to public safety
  • Taxpayers should demand the cost analysis McMahill admitted doesn’t exist

Welcome to the corporation of policing, where Silicon Valley billionaires offload failure, and sheriffs accept liability without reading the headlines.

MA Tesla Kills One in “Veered” Crash

The way this initial report was written, it has hallmarks of Tesla driverless suddenly crashing into a tree, doors failing to open, and the driver burned to death while trying to escape.

According to Bristol County District Attorney Thomas M. Quinn III, Easton Police and EMS responded to a 911 call at about 1:04 a.m. reporting a single-vehicle crash in the area of Route 138 in Easton, just over the Raynham-Easton town line.

First responders arrived to find a blue Tesla with significant damage in a wooded area about 20 feet from the southbound lane. The Tesla was on fire, and Quinn said human remains were found in the rear seat of the vehicle.

Tesla Cybertruck Deploys Airbag When Climate Control is Touched

A Cybertruck owner forum has a complaint that when a driver tried to touch climate control, the knee airbag deployed.

Source: Cybertruck Owners Club

The fact that it was specifically the driver knee airbag deployed while the driver was interacting with driver climate controls… suggests the Tesla system lacks proper debouncing or validation logic to filter out false positives.

This is exactly the kind of systemic safety failure that strengthens the Piedmont crash lawsuit. Tesla’s defective approach to vehicle safety integration needs more exposure. I’m tempted to write up a detailed look at why. Here’s a quick back-of-napkin sketch.

  • False crash signal generation: airbag control module may have received bogus deployment signals, possibly from electrical noise or a fault in the crash sensor network
  • CAN bus cross-contamination: touching the climate control (which communicates via CAN) may have introduced signals that the airbag system misinterpreted as a deployment trigger
  • Grounding or electrical isolation failure: low-voltage interface action affects a safety-critical system
  • Software logic error in the airbag deployment algorithm

Arkansas Farmer Known for Calling Hitler the Good Guy, Turns on Trump Because… Epstein Files

Just a few months ago this average Arkansas guy was praising Hitler, and Trump, as if they were all in the same camp.

…December 2024… he stated that he would “take a bullet for” the president, adding that Trump, 79, doesn’t “make many mistakes and when he does he’ll figure it out and he’ll fix it and I trust him.”

[…]

Outside of fighting, Mitchell is also known for being a proud farmer in Arkansas and for his comments describing Adolf Hitler as a “good guy.”

“I really do think before Hitler got on meth, he was a guy I’d go fishing with,” Mitchell said on the ArkanSanity Podcast in January. “He [Hitler] fought for his country,” he added.

A good guy? What exactly was “good” about Hitler “kicking out the greedy Jews” before 1938 as opposed to after? This framing isn’t just ahistorical ignorance; it’s revealing what is actually admired. It’s apparently normal in Arkansas to say out loud “love that guy Hitler, hate that Jews and gays survived and he didn’t”.

The “Hitler was fine until drugs” narrative is historically nonsensical and morally bankrupt. Hitler’s antisemitism, violent authoritarianism, and territorial ambitions were fully formed in the early 1920s. The Beer Hall Putsch was 1923. Mein Kampf, praising the racism of Henry Ford, was published in 1925. The methodical legal destruction of Weimar democracy was in 1933-1934, the Nuremberg Laws were 1935 and Kristallnacht was 1938… all before documented substance abuse started.

The false “drug cause” narrative serves a specific purpose: it lets “drug war” adherents admire Hitler’s core antisemitic project—the persecution and expulsion of Jews—while falsely externalizing industrial genocide as a drug-induced deviation. This totally fake compartmentalization allows praise for exactly what Hitler set out to do from the beginning, yet blame to be pushed onto substances as “unfortunate excess” in achieving goals.

The Arkansas context matters because it’s not idiosyncratic. This is a regional political culture with deep roots in Lost Cause mythology, where you can venerate Confederate leaders, celebrate “heritage,” and react with fury when called racist.

The same mental infrastructure applies to Hitler: admire the aesthetics of power, the mythology of national revival, the “fighting for his people” narrative, while externalizing the genocide as either propaganda, an unfortunate excess, or a drug-induced deviation from his “true” character. Hitler was an Austrian who took over Germany and murdered millions of his own people. He fought for himself at everyone else’s expense.

If history means anything at all then those who praise Hitler are in danger of being executed by those who praise Hitler

We’ve just established this average Arkansas guy praises Hitler and claims that drugs excuse genocide. Now watch what actually breaks his Trump support… Epstein files. Seriously.

“The first thing for me was he didn’t release the Epstein files—they’re even acting like they didn’t exist,” the 31-year-old said [he’s] “not with Donald Trump no more.”

“I don’t support him, I don’t like him, I think he’s a corrupted leader, and it took me a while to come to that conclusion, but I finally am coming to it.”

Still likes Hitler. Suddenly hates Trump. What’s revealing here is the transactional, personality-driven nature of American politics. Hollywood good/bad framing, as documented by “The Act of Killing“, is a dangerous god/devil binary of disinformation that short-circuits actual understanding.

There’s no engagement with ideology, policy, or governance. Hitler becomes “a guy I’d go fishing with” based on totally fraudulent vibes (people who grow up in Arkansas will praise Hitler, make anti-Semitic statements and even decorate their homes with swastikas, yet say they are deeply offended if you dare to accuse them of being Nazis).

There’s a specific strain of white identity politics of America where overtly praising Hitler can coexist with angry offense at being called a Nazi, because in that framing, “Nazi” means a BAD person to them, and they separate that from being a “patriot” who believes in Hitler’s ideology (racist genocide).

They’ve carved out rhetorical space where you can admire Hitler’s “nationalism,” his “fighting for his country,” his “strength,” and even his diet and his preference for roads with no curves, while treating the Holocaust as either exaggerated, incidental, or the result of him “going bad” on drugs.

It’s a Holocaust inversion common in Arkansas mixed with American exceptionalism: we could have that kind of genocidal obsessed strong leader without those genocidal consequences.

Graffiti outside the Tesla factory in Berlin, Germany.

Trump thus gets all their support until one specific grievance—the Epstein files—becomes the sudden breaking point. Not family separation, not January 6th, not fraud convictions, not bankruptcy, not the documented pattern of sexual misconduct, not illegal detention, not racism, not ignorance, not authoritarian rhetoric about terminating the Constitution. But this one thing.

This pattern—where support for authoritarian figures is based on parasocial identification rather than principled analysis—makes democratic accountability almost impossible.

Treating politics like drinking buddy tests means vetting based on whether they’ve “gone bad” on a random moral issue, not engaging with what makes authoritarianism dangerous: the systematic concentration of power, the elimination of institutional constraints, and the targeting of vulnerable populations.

The Epstein angle is particularly telling. It suggests he believed Trump would release the files, that this was somehow a litmus test for anti-establishment credibility. But why would someone with Trump’s documented history in those circles, with his public statements about Epstein and young women, with his own allegations—why would that person be the one to expose it? The cognitive dissonance required is extraordinary. Trump lies about everything, hurts everyone, but this… this?

This is the danger of the “good guy gone bad” narrative. It prevents people from recognizing authoritarian projects even as they’re the ones building it.

The hollowness at the core of personality-cult politics is terrifying.

There’s no there, there.

No analysis of how power works, how wealth concentrates, how institutions get captured, how rights get stripped away systematically.

It’s all just vibes, grievances, and the perpetual search for a strong father figure who’ll hurt the “right” people.

This makes the personality cult people complicit in building what they claim to oppose. They’re not recognizing the authoritarian project because they’re helping construct it, while falsely painting themselves as the rebels.

What makes the “Hitler fought for his country” line so historically illiterate is that Hitler was Austrian, took over Germany through a combination of violence and institutional capture, and then destroyed Germany. He didn’t fight for Germany—he fought for a racist imperial vanity project that considered actual Germans expendable. Millions of Germans died because of his decisions. The country was partitioned for half a century. If “fighting for your country” means leaving it occupied, divided, and devastated, then the definition is meaningless.

The Arkansas Lost Cause infrastructure makes the stupidity possible because it’s already normalized this exact cognitive move: venerate leaders who destroyed their own society (the Confederacy lasted four years and left the South devastated), claim they were fighting for “their people” (they were fighting to preserve slavery), externalize the atrocities (slavery wasn’t that bad, or it would have ended anyway, or the North was worse), and react with rage when called out for supporting a violent racist genocidal platform.

It’s the same playbook: Arkansans romanticize the aesthetics, deny the ideology, and externalize all the consequences of their hate-based fantasy.

German public news (DW) recently profiled the expansive Nazi enclaves in Arkansas adorned with swastikas—a regional infrastructure normalizing extreme hate so much that praising Hitler in public offices and on podcasts becomes unremarkable rather than career-ending.