Talk about range anxiety, this Canadian Tesla owner definitely didn’t make it to their destination.

Police impounded a Tesla that was going 148 km/h in a 90 km/h zone, leaving the family inside to search for another mode of transportation at Yoho National Park.

Why was a Tesla breaking the speed limit so egregiously? Owners have recently reported, given a decade of abject immoral lies about data collection and “learning”, the latest software “doesn’t understand the law“.

Tesla Engineer Says Company Kept Scant Safety Data… Akshay Phatak said Tesla did not maintain records before March 2018 for evaluating whether it was safer to operate Tesla vehicles with the autopilot engaged or shut off.

Tesla not only kept scant safety data, it ruthlessly attacked anyone who kept data, let alone anyone who reported the truth about gaps in safety (e.g Tesla is a clear and present threat).

Look at that testimony.

Look at timeline.

One more time.

An engineer at Tesla just testified in court that the company did not keep safety data before 2018, while the CEO attacked everyone who kept track of safety data!

[Tesla’s CEO] reposted a message on X saying “Stalin, Mao, and Hitler didn’t murder millions of people. Their public sector employees did.”

The man who says Hitler didn’t murder millions is giving the police every indication his “robots” deployed into public spaces were designed as centrally controlled unaccountable killing machines.

Consider a robot failing to respect the law for over a decade is intentional. Consider it has been built to ignore boundaries by design.

Tesla recalls nearly 54,000 vehicles that may disobey stop signs

Democratic states should be impounding Tesla vehicles on sight, regardless of speed.

The company is a fraud, their technology is a predictable disaster.

Related: While Canada was at war against Hitler (8 October 1940) it arrested Elon Musk’s grandfather for technology-based political activism considered a threat to public safety.

It’s only been two weeks since the last Tesla killed a motorcyclist in California, in a case called murder.

Now a local journalist, monitoring emergency channels, has posted this note about yet another Tesla case.

All lanes of the eastbound 210 freeway at the Azusa Avenue overpass are temporarily closed after a fatal crash Tuesday evening.

Initial reports indicate a motorcycle collided with a black Tesla Cyber Truck around 6:09 p.m. July 15. The collision is taking up the No. 1 and HOV lanes, according to the California Highway Patrol.

That reference to a lane is perhaps notable given Cybertruck owners have been complaining this past week how Tesla AI ignores the law, blindly changing lanes.

Officials say the train had just left a station when the Tesla crashed into it.

NBC reports add that the 17 year old occupant was injured when the Tesla drove around clear safety barriers at 2pm to crash into the train.

Elon Musk initially created “driverless” hype in response to a lawsuit over a cyclist death. A Tesla owner had sued claiming an intoxicating “new car smell” causing him to fall sleep should be blamed for death of a cyclist on Highway 1 just north of Santa Cruz, California.

A 63 year-old retiree driving a new Tesla Model S last November crossed a double yellow line, drove up a hill, drove down a hill, and finally crashed into bicyclist Joshua Alper, killing him as a result. […] Jain has been charged with misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter in Alper’s death, and not a felony, because he “did not act in a reckless way” according to the report.

A media blitz ensued with Musk angrily tweeting that he would prove how to stop all cyclist deaths from cars by rushing to deploy “driverless”, promoting the idea drivers could fall asleep and still be safe.

That was a whole decade ago in 2014 when AI was completely useless and unethical. However, clearly immoral Stanford activists like Fei-Fei Li, and a couple young Canadian graduate students, had totally sold Musk on the lie that AI would make driverless cars easily and rapidly achievable.

By 2016 Elon Musk was so steeped in the Stanford AI fraud cycles that he expanded his infamously wrong claims; drivers were told they would never need to touch the steering wheel at all by 2017! In fact, it was the opposite. Driverless required even more attentive drivers, not less. In April 2018 a Tesla ran over and killed a man who had stopped riding and stood next to his bike. Tesla hired armies of lawyers to bury this story, which is why the American press only reported on an Uber killing a pedestrian at the same time as Tesla.

Right? Everyone knows the Uber story. Have you ever heard about how Tesla killed a man standing by his bike at almost the exact same time?

And so fast forward to today, Uber cancelled their deadly driverless program while Tesla has killed yet another cyclist and criminally sped off to kill again and again and again:

The Los Angeles Police Department is asking for the public’s help to identify the driver of a Tesla that hit and killed a bicyclist and then fled the scene without stopping.

It happened on July 1, around 10 p.m. in South Los Angeles.

According to the LAPD, a black Tesla Model X was speeding eastbound on 67th Street in the direction of Flower Street, close to the 110 Freeway.

The Tesla struck a cyclist that was riding on 67th Street, knocking them to the ground in a violent collision.

The Tesla driver then sped off, not stopping to identify themselves or render aid, which is required by state law. Instead, the Tesla fled east toward Broadway Avenue where it was last seen.

Paramedics arrived on scene and transported the unidentified male cyclist to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.