CIA Shuts Down Factbook, Replaced by Facebook

A new Politico eulogy mourns the CIA World Factbook like a beloved teacher retiring.

On Feb. 4, the Trump administration abruptly shuttered this widely accepted account of humanity and its flags, nations, customs, militaries and borders. […] A great wave of grief rose from Factbook fans. Many said they mourned an America that valued knowledge for its own sake. Some saw darker forces at work under a president whose administration has promoted — in times of war and peace — “alternative facts.” “Stay curious,” the CIA advised in its “fond farewell” to the Factbook.

I have thoughts.

The coverage, like most coverage of this story, gets the history wrong in ways that matter.

The Factbook was an intelligence product, and understanding why it was created, why it was made public, and why it was shut down requires distinguishing between three different CIA eras that the press keeps unintelligently collapsing into one.

A Tale of Three Eras

The first CIA was unmistakably “Wild Bill” Donovan’s. In 1943, Donovan built the Joint Army Navy Intelligence Studies program because Pearl Harbor had exposed a catastrophic gap: the United States had no coordinated system for knowing what was happening in the world. When the National Security Act of 1947 created the CIA, it inherited that mission. Basic intelligence. Know the world so you can act in it.

Donovan’s vision was a knowledge agency that served the republic. He basically said prevent America First from ever rising again.

The second CIA was Allen Dulles’s. And Dulles was not a good leader. By the mid-1950s, the agency had become something Donovan’s original architecture was never designed to house. Guatemala 1954. Iran 1953. Bay of Pigs 1961. The Phoenix Program. MKULTRA. Domestic surveillance of American citizens. The agency created to stop America First and prevent another Pearl Harbor was running coups, assassinating foreign leaders, and dosing unwitting subjects with LSD. This was the CIA of the dumb decades, and it had almost nothing in common with the coordinating body Congress stood up in 1947.

The third CIA was the one that emerged from the necessary Church Committee hearings in 1975. Senator Frank Church’s investigation exposed the pathological “Family Jewels,” the agency’s own internal catalog of illegal operations.

At THIS junction, the CIA needed rehabilitation. It needed to demonstrate that it still served the public. The Factbook, which had existed as a classified product since 1962 and been declassified in 1971, was released to the public that same year. The timing was the message. The agency was saying: we are still Donovan’s knowledge shop. We still do basic intelligence. We still serve the republic.

It was a rejection of Nixon.

The Politico article traces the Factbook’s origin to the CIA’s founding in 1947, then jumps to 1971.

Nope.

That leap skips the entire institutional history that explains why the Factbook went public in the first place. You cannot understand the 1975 publication without understanding what the agency did between 1947 and 1975 that made a public rehabilitation necessary. “There was never confirmation that the bad press inspired the wide release,” the AP writes.

Do we need confirmation that water is wet?

The Factbook was the CIA’s move back to Donovan days of 1947. To the knowledge mission. Because that’s useful.

Early Internet Infrastructure

It also became something more. Being included in the Factbook could confer legitimacy upon a nation or an opposition party. That line is buried in the Politico piece like it is incidental. It is the entire point. The CIA decided what counted as a country. What its borders were. Who governed it. Which entities were sovereign, which were dependencies, which were disputed. Every student, journalist, policymaker, and Model UN delegate who reached for it accepted CIA-curated categories as the baseline description of the world.

That is an essential agency function. The Factbook did not merely describe reality. It organized reality into categories that shaped how millions of people understood it. The intelligence operation was the publication. You did not need to hide it when the product itself was the instrument of influence.

Face the Facts

Facebook (2004) copies this architecture with precision. A “book” of “facts” about the world becomes a “book” of “faces” about people. Free to users. Positioned as neutral infrastructure. Becomes the default reference that everyone from individuals to institutions to governments relies on.

The Factbook defined countries. Facebook defines identity (real name policy), relationships (social graph), events (News Feed), and truth (content moderation, fact-checking partnerships). The same operation at a different scale: make a population legible, categorizable, targetable. Call it a public service.

The CIA called its product “basic intelligence.” Facebook calls its product “connecting people.” Both are euphemisms for making populations legible to power.

Thiel as Bridge

Peter Thiel was Facebook’s first outside investor. The year was 2004. The same year he co-founded Palantir, which received its seed funding from In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital arm. Palantir’s software was built through iterative collaboration between Palantir engineers and intelligence agency analysts over nearly three years.

Two products launched in the same year by the same investor. One consumer-facing “factbook” about people. One intelligence-facing “seeing stone” about targets. One collects. The other operationalizes.

1968 Again

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the agency needs to refocus on its “core mission.” That is an explicit statement that the public knowledge function was never the real mission. The covert operations were.

Closing the Factbook is the CIA officially abandoning Donovan’s 1947 vision and embracing the second CIA, the one the Church Committee tried to reform. It’s the thing Donovan warned against.

Nixon shut out the public and weaponized intelligence against domestic enemies. Trump shuts down the public-facing product entirely and hands the knowledge function to private infrastructure his allies built with CIA seed money. The pattern is simple. The mechanism boring.

The Business Model

The Factbook shutdown fits a pattern so consistent it qualifies as policy. Trump’s March 2025 executive order dismantled the Institute of Museum and Library Services, the only federal agency that funds libraries. His 2026 budget eliminates it entirely. The National Park Service lost 24 percent of its workforce in the first half of 2025. The proposed budget cuts public lands agency funding by more than a third. Interior Secretary Burgum told Congress that if his department were a private company, it would have the “largest balance sheet in the world.”

Libraries. Parks. Public lands. The CDC website. Smithsonian exhibits. The Factbook. Every free public resource built with taxpayer money, shut down, gutted, or stripped for parts. The money that funded these things does not come back. It disappears into a government that returns less and less while collecting the same.

Fifty-two days after the CIA killed the Factbook, a Dubai-based startup launched worldfactbook.io with “AI-powered intelligence” and a developer API. Free for now. That is a customer acquisition strategy. The playbook is familiar: defund the public version, wait for the private replacement, let the market set the price for what taxpayers already paid to build.

Burgum looks at 500 million acres of public land and sees a balance sheet. Thiel looks at 3 billion Facebook users and sees a dataset. The Factbook told everyone how the world worked, for free, for sixty years. The replacement will do the same thing, for a fee, with your data as the payment.

What Wild Bill Would Say

Donovan warned in 1945 (August 25, 1945 paper to Truman, “Principles Which Should Govern the Establishment of a Centralized United States Foreign Intelligence System“):

The formulation of national policy both in its political and military aspects is influenced and determined by knowledge (or ignorance) of the aims, capabilities, intentions and policies of other nations.

Knowledge or ignorance. Donovan built the architecture because he understood that a country that does not know the world cannot act in it. Eighty years later, the government he served is choosing ignorance on purpose. Shutting down the Factbook. Defunding libraries. Selling parks. Stripping public data from federal websites. Every free source of knowledge, systematically eliminated.

Donovan’s statue still stands in the lobby at Langley. The Factbook he inspired is gone. The “basic intelligence” it contained now lives on servers in Dubai and Menlo Park, managed by people who answer to shareholders, not citizens.

Stay curious. Now with a subscription required.

William Donovan’s duffel bag in the CIA museum

This Means War: Nate Silver Describes a Coup and Calls It the Weather

The Substack migration that Nate Silver is celebrating today is worth scrutiny.

Moving from a captured public square to private subscription newsletters doesn’t restore information integrity. It privatizes it. The people who can afford $200/year subscriptions get Silver’s shiny analysis. Everyone else gets Catturd. That’s stratification, the opposite of a correction. Does he need the money more than the moral fiber?

Framing social media algorithms as a neutral ecological observation, rather than as decisions made by identifiable people for identifiable reasons, is wrong. Musk is a Nazi who bought Twitter to control a resolution mechanism. He literally rebranded with a swastika. The engagement metrics Silver analyzes so carefully are channel output after capture, like listening to dictator radio after a coup. The question isn’t what thrives, it’s who committed the coup, and why.

The most revealing data is the one that Silver surfs right past. The New York Times has 53 million followers and gets a few hundred engagements on breaking news. That’s suppression far more than a decline. A platform owner decided institutional journalism would be punished and partisan entertainment rewarded. The “ecosystem” was engineered. It’s opposite to evolution, like someone wanted digital dodo birds to inhabit their private island.

Silver actually describes the ecology of platform incentives without ever naming what he’s documenting:

Data science of information warfare.

Every observation he makes is a warfare concept dressed in media-business language.

The algorithmic boost Musk built for himself is command authority over the information battlespace.

Suppressing external links is severing supply lines.

The “island effect” producing Catturd and Gavin Newsom Press Office as dominant species is what happens when you degrade the information environment until only propagandists can thrive. That’s motivated terrain shaping.

None of it is accidental. Historians are trained to recognize what’s going on. Warfare is the word he’s reaching for, while he flees his house of straw for a brick one and charges $200 at the door for protection.

flyingpenguin. free and open since 1995.

What Haile Selassie Would Tell 100 International Law Experts About Trump

Trump said “I don’t need international law.” Hegseth calls rules of engagement “stupid.”

The new letter signed by over 100 experts acknowledges these quotes and then proceeds as if restating the rules of war louder will matter. I’m reminded of the early warnings of Haile Selassie about Mussolini, which obviously went unheeded. The whole thing is an appeal to a framework that fascist leaders explicitly repudiate.

Selassie’s 1936 League of Nations address is an exact historical parallel: a direct appeal to an international body that had already demonstrated it would not act. The outcome was catastrophic. We know, right? Mussolini showed us what’s next, right?

Haile Selassie, the Emperor of Abyssinia (modern day Ethiopia) with Brigadier Daniel Arthur Sandford on his left and Colonel Orde Wingate on his right, in Dambacha Fort after it had been captured, 15 April 1941

Let me put it in simpler context. The letter correctly lists violations. But who acts? The ICC? Trump targeted and sanctioned ICC officials to prevent this. The Security Council? Trump doesn’t believe in the UN but he is set up with a veto. The letter’s final section vaguely invokes Common Article 1 obligations on allies but never names a single ally, a single concrete action, a single consequence. “We urge”? That is not enforcement.

And there’s a gap in the analysis. Iran’s internet shutdown, Israel’s broadcast ban, Gulf states arresting citizens, FCC threatening US broadcasters. That’s the “Nixonian” operational reality this letter completely ignores. How does anyone enforce a law if they can’t document violations? Trump recently installed two Nixonian operatives to poison and destroy official communications.

It’s interesting that Congress is never mentioned in the letter. Wouldn’t domestic power be the usual answer to stop a democratic leader? The War Powers Resolution is never mentioned. Federal courts are never mentioned. If Trump openly says international law is a dead letter to the executive, the only remaining check is domestic. Yet the letter doesn’t touch it. To me this suggests loss of faith in American checks and balances, post-democracy, and thus it’s an appeal to the world for rescue.

However, the letter doesn’t rise to international enforcement because it seems overly focused on a tone problem. Trump asserts that the US president is above international law as a matter of constitutional authority. The letter says Trump’s statements are “alarming rhetoric” and “disrespect for norms.” But it isn’t just rhetoric. His words are chaotic, self-contradictory and random at best. They deserve little focus. His actions are the many crimes.

What’s really been happening is the systematic elimination of domestic enforcement of international law obligations. The only people inside the US government who could have flagged violations in real time all have been fired. That’s not a small consideration. That’s the whole ballgame. And yet the letter says it has “concerns about institutional safeguards”: removing JAGs, abolishing civilian protection teams, and gutting the law of war manual references from the NDS. Without those, what’s left? Game over.

And that brings us back to the historical perspective completely absent from the letter. When a powerful militant state openly declares itself unbound, and no one enforces, the bad behavior accelerates. The letter fails to state what they see happening when their appeal fails. It already has, as Selassie would say.

The real question, which the letter should have started with, is which allies are complicit and what domestic institutions have abdicated? Or to put it more clearly, now that all the guardrails are behind us, what prevents the world from repeating what comes next? The institution getting all the funding is the one committing the violations.

Trump told guests. “We can’t take care of daycare. Medicaid, Medicare, all these individual things. We have to take care of one thing: military….”

Source: Axios

Why Tom Holland is Going to Hell

CNN ran an Easter feature on Tom Holland, the British pop historian who wrote Dominion and now tours the American evangelical circuit as their favorite secular validator. The headline promises a “brush with the supernatural.” The article delivers something more instructive: a case study in what happens when a thesis is tailored to its paying audience.

Holland went to Sinjar in 2016, where ISIS had massacred Yazidis by the hundreds. Men executed. Women sold into slavery. The stench of decomposing bodies so overpowering he doubled over on camera. His takeaway: a cross was still standing above the rubble. It moved him. Financially. The dead Yazidis didn’t get a second thought as he walked through them towards his personal savior plans.

I was convinced I was going to devote my life to the Yazidi cause – and I tried. But I don’t devote my life to it. There are whole weeks when I don’t think of them.

Well, the Yazidi aren’t Christian, which is perhaps what prevented him from thinking of them more.

Booze for the Alcoholics

Holland’s thesis in Dominion is that Western values like compassion, equality, and human rights are Christian inventions. Secular people hold Christian beliefs without knowing it. The argument has a problem and a function, and the function explains why nobody talks about the problem.

The problem is that the thesis is false. Buddhist ethics developed sophisticated frameworks for compassion and non-harm five centuries before Christ. Jewish law codified obligations to the poor, the stranger, and the vulnerable long before Paul wrote his first letter. Confucian reciprocity predates Christianity by the same margin. Islamic jurisprudence built an entire legal architecture around human dignity. The Yazidi faith he walked through in Sinjar teaches its followers to pray for other religions before their own. It traces to pre-Zoroastrian traditions over a thousand years before Christ. Holland ignores ALL of it. A historian who omits most of human civilization from his thesis about most of human civilization is not doing history. He is doing something else.

The function is flattery. The Southern Baptist Seminary president calls Holland’s premise “fairly unassailable.” American evangelicals get a credentialed British intellectual telling them their religion invented morality. Holland gets the audience, the debate invitations, the YouTube clips, the Easter profiles. Booze for the alcoholics. Delivered in a posh accent with a PBS shine.

The same CNN writer who profiled Holland for Easter published a piece three months ago that documents Christianity’s central role in the KKK, slavery, and colonial genocide. The Holland thesis requires amnesia from the people telling it.

The Content Creator in the Foxhole

Holland’s own faith statements reveal how thin the performance is. “There are times where I can feel that I believe it. There are times when I don’t feel it at all.” His mother tells CNN “he never quite acknowledges it.” He says belief makes “the universe more interesting.” This is not faith. It is aesthetic consumption.

He cites R.S. Thomas as his spiritual touchstone. Any reader of Thomas knows what that means. Thomas was the poet of God’s absence, unanswered prayer, the empty church. His life’s work was the theology of divine silence. Holland cited him as a branding reference in a CNN puff piece. If Holland understood what Thomas was actually writing about, he would not have brought him up.

Holland himself invokes the foxhole cliché. Diagnosed with bowel cancer in 2021, he prayed at midnight mass on Christmas Eve. The cancer hadn’t spread. His brother connected him with a specialist. He now calls it a possible “Marian miracle” while conceding he can’t “100 percent say it’s a coincidence.” His brother’s phone call saved him. He credited the Virgin Mary.

Serious people have examined what happens to faith in actual foxholes. Rabbi Richard Rubenstein published After Auschwitz in 1966 and founded an entire field of theology on one premise: after the Holocaust, belief in a God who acts in history is intellectually indefensible. Elie Wiesel, who survived Auschwitz as a teenager, wrote The Trial of God with God as the defendant. The people who endured genocide concluded God was absent or dead. Holland walked through a genocide site and saw a camera angle.

The Honest Version

Christianity did reshape Western moral frameworks. That much is defensible, and Holland deserves credit for stating it plainly. Where the argument collapses is in calling it revelation rather than what the historical record shows it to be: power technology.

After 1945, British occupation forces deployed church networks across Germany to deprogram a generation raised on Nazi ideology. Christianity was the available operating system that could overwrite the previous one. The British didn’t evangelize the Hitler Youth because they believed. They did it because it worked. Christianity spread through colonization for the same reason. Empires used it because it was effective, and its effectiveness is what Holland is actually documenting.

An honest version of Holland’s thesis would say: Christianity became the dominant moral framework of the West because it was backed by cruel militant empires of history trying to obliterate other faiths, for profit. That is a serious historical argument. But it would empty his bleachers, so he wraps the same insight in a conversion narrative and sells it as mystery. The stench from Holland is almost too much to bear.

CNN calls this a story about faith. It’s a story about supply and demand. And if Holland actually believes what he now claims to believe, he should worry. He declared himself a Christian, then used the faith to sell snake oil to the faithful. By his own adopted theology, that’s the kind of thing they send you to hell for.